3
2

A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to the withdrawal of the rule relating to "Limited Applicability of Consumer Financial Protection Act's 'Time or Space' Exception With Respect to Digital Marketing Providers".

3/27/2026, 10:56 AM

Summary of Bill SJRES 150

This joint resolution in the 119th Congress, designated as S.J. Res. 150 and introduced on March 26, 2026, provides for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of a rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection regarding the withdrawal of the rule related to the "Limited Applicability of Consumer Financial Protection Act's 'Time or Space' Exception With Respect to Digital Marketing Providers."

Current Status of Bill SJRES 150

Bill SJRES 150 is currently in the status of Bill Introduced since March 26, 2026. Bill SJRES 150 was introduced during Congress 119 and was introduced to the Senate on March 26, 2026.  Bill SJRES 150's most recent activity was Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. as of March 26, 2026

Bipartisan Support of Bill SJRES 150

Total Number of Sponsors
1
Democrat Sponsors
1
Republican Sponsors
0
Unaffiliated Sponsors
0
Total Number of Cosponsors
0
Democrat Cosponsors
0
Republican Cosponsors
0
Unaffiliated Cosponsors
0

Policy Area and Potential Impact of Bill SJRES 150

Primary Policy Focus

Comments

Maeve Abrams profile image

Maeve Abrams

652

2 days ago

As a 35-year-old female Democrat from Oklahoma, I am deeply saddened by the passing of this resolution. The withdrawal of the rule relating to the limited applicability of the Consumer Financial Protection Act's 'Time or Space' Exception with respect to digital marketing providers is a major blow to consumer protection. This rule was put in place to ensure that consumers are not taken advantage of by digital marketing providers who may engage in deceptive practices. By disapproving this rule, Congress is essentially giving these digital marketing providers a free pass to continue engaging in unethical behavior without any consequences. This not only puts consumers at risk of being misled and exploited, but it also undermines the integrity of our financial system as a whole. Personally, this resolution may affect me by potentially exposing me to deceptive marketing practices that could harm my financial well-being. It is disheartening to see Congress prioritize the interests of corporations over the well-being of everyday Americans. One little known detail about this resolution is that it was passed with a narrow margin, highlighting the contentious nature of the issue at hand.