0
0

An original resolution authorizing expenditures by the Committee on the Judiciary.

2/11/2025, 5:48 AM

Summary of Bill SRES 65

Bill 119 sres 65 is an original resolution that authorizes expenditures by the Committee on the Judiciary in the US Congress. The resolution outlines the specific amounts of money that the committee is allowed to spend on various activities, such as hearings, investigations, and staff salaries. It also includes provisions for oversight and accountability to ensure that the funds are being used appropriately.

The resolution is designed to provide the Committee on the Judiciary with the necessary resources to carry out its duties effectively and efficiently. It is an important piece of legislation that helps to ensure that the committee can fulfill its responsibilities in overseeing the judicial system and addressing important legal issues facing the country.

Overall, Bill 119 sres 65 is a straightforward and necessary resolution that authorizes expenditures for the Committee on the Judiciary in the US Congress. It is an important tool for ensuring that the committee has the resources it needs to carry out its important work in a responsible and effective manner.

Current Status of Bill SRES 65

Bill SRES 65 is currently in the status of Bill Introduced since February 6, 2025. Bill SRES 65 was introduced during Congress 119 and was introduced to the Senate on February 6, 2025.  Bill SRES 65's most recent activity was Referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration. (text: CR S799) as of February 6, 2025

Bipartisan Support of Bill SRES 65

Total Number of Sponsors
3
Democrat Sponsors
0
Republican Sponsors
3
Unaffiliated Sponsors
0
Total Number of Cosponsors
0
Democrat Cosponsors
0
Republican Cosponsors
0
Unaffiliated Cosponsors
0

Policy Area and Potential Impact of Bill SRES 65

Primary Policy Focus

Alternate Title(s) of Bill SRES 65

An original resolution authorizing expenditures by the Committee on the Judiciary.
An original resolution authorizing expenditures by the Committee on the Judiciary.

Comments