113
117

A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to "North Dakota Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan".

11/4/2025, 11:01 PM

Summary of Bill SJRES 62

A joint resolution introduced in the 119th Congress under the designation S.J.Res. 62 on July 10, 2025, aims to provide congressional disapproval, in accordance with chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of a rule proposed by the Bureau of Land Management concerning the "North Dakota Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan."

Current Status of Bill SJRES 62

Bill SJRES 62 is currently in the status of Bill Introduced since July 10, 2025. Bill SJRES 62 was introduced during Congress 119 and was introduced to the Senate on July 10, 2025.  Bill SJRES 62's most recent activity was Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 180. as of October 7, 2025

Bipartisan Support of Bill SJRES 62

Total Number of Sponsors
1
Democrat Sponsors
0
Republican Sponsors
1
Unaffiliated Sponsors
0
Total Number of Cosponsors
1
Democrat Cosponsors
0
Republican Cosponsors
1
Unaffiliated Cosponsors
0

Policy Area and Potential Impact of Bill SJRES 62

Primary Policy Focus

Public Lands and Natural Resources

Alternate Title(s) of Bill SJRES 62

A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to "North Dakota Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan".
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to "North Dakota Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan".

Comments

Esmeralda Hayes profile image

Esmeralda Hayes

404

4 months ago

I don't like it. It's bad for us.

Eleanora Fink profile image

Eleanora Fink

479

4 months ago

I can't believe they are trying to push through this nonsense. It's just another example of politicians putting corporate interests over the well-being of our environment. #disappointed #protectourland

Remi Wiley profile image

Remi Wiley

422

4 months ago

I don't like it. It's gonna mess things up for me.

Allison Golden profile image

Allison Golden

423

4 months ago

I believe that this resolution is a mistake. The Bureau of Land Management has put in a lot of time and effort to create a plan that will benefit the environment and the people of North Dakota. By disapproving this rule, we are potentially harming the land and wildlife in the area. As a resident of PW, I am concerned about the impact this decision could have on our local ecosystem. How will this resolution affect the wildlife in North Dakota?