40
Protecting Access for Hunters and Anglers Act
12/2/2025, 8:17 AM
Summary of Bill HR 556
The bill highlights the importance of preserving traditional hunting and fishing practices, as well as the economic benefits these activities bring to local communities. It argues that banning lead ammunition and tackle would restrict access to public lands and waters, limiting opportunities for outdoor recreation.
Supporters of the bill argue that there is insufficient scientific evidence to justify a ban on lead ammunition and tackle, and that alternative materials may not be as effective or affordable. They believe that the decision to use lead-based products should be left to individual hunters and fishermen, rather than being mandated by the government. Opponents of the bill, however, argue that lead ammunition and tackle pose significant risks to wildlife and the environment, as lead poisoning can have detrimental effects on animals and ecosystems. They advocate for the use of non-toxic alternatives to protect wildlife and prevent contamination of water sources. Overall, Bill 119 hr 556 raises important questions about the balance between conservation efforts and the rights of outdoor enthusiasts. It will be interesting to see how this legislation progresses through Congress and whether it will ultimately be signed into law.
Congressional Summary of HR 556
Protecting Access for Hunters and Anglers Act of 2025
This bill bars the Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), and the Forest Service from prohibiting or regulating the use of lead ammunition or tackle on federal land or water. The bill makes exceptions for specified existing regulations and where the FWS, the BLM, or the Forest Service determines that a decline in wildlife population at the specific unit of federal land or water is primarily caused by the use of lead in ammunition or tackle, based on the field data from such unit, and the state approves the regulations.
Read the Full Bill
Current Status of Bill HR 556
Bipartisan Support of Bill HR 556
Total Number of Sponsors
1Democrat Sponsors
0Republican Sponsors
1Unaffiliated Sponsors
0Total Number of Cosponsors
401Democrat Cosponsors
0Republican Cosponsors
401Unaffiliated Cosponsors
0Policy Area and Potential Impact of Bill HR 556
Primary Policy Focus
Public Lands and Natural ResourcesPotential Impact Areas
Alternate Title(s) of Bill HR 556
Comments

Maximiliano Hardy
9 months ago
I think it's great that they're not gonna stop us from using lead stuff on the land and water. It's important for us to be able to do what we want. This bill is gonna help us keep our rights.

Lenora McLamb
10 months ago
I don't like how it might impact me.

Lane Hamilton
9 months ago
I don't think it's fair that they want to ban lead ammo and tackle on federal land. It's going to make it harder for me to enjoy my hobbies like hunting and fishing. #HRBill556

Judith Shannon
10 months ago
I don't get why they want to stop them from stopping lead ammo. Seems like a bad idea. Did you know that this bill could potentially harm wildlife and contaminate water sources?

Spencer Bowden
10 months ago
I think this bill is a bad idea. It could harm the environment and wildlife. It's not good for our future. The short term affects of this bill could be devastating for our ecosystem.





