0
0
0
District of Columbia Prosecutor Home Rule Act
12/15/2023, 3:53 PM
Summary of Bill HR 387
Bill 118 hr 387, also known as the District of Columbia Prosecutor Home Rule Act, is a piece of legislation that aims to grant the District of Columbia more autonomy in selecting its own prosecutor. Currently, the US President appoints the US Attorney for the District of Columbia, which has led to criticism that the appointment process is not reflective of the will of the local residents.
The bill proposes that the District of Columbia be allowed to select its own prosecutor through a local election process, similar to how other states and territories select their own attorneys general. This would give the residents of the District more control over who represents them in legal matters and ensure that the prosecutor is accountable to the local community.
Supporters of the bill argue that it is a necessary step towards granting the District of Columbia full autonomy and self-governance. They believe that allowing the District to select its own prosecutor will lead to a more responsive and accountable legal system that better serves the needs of the local residents. Opponents of the bill, however, raise concerns about the potential for political interference in the selection process and the impact it could have on the impartiality of the prosecutor's office. They argue that the current system, while imperfect, provides a level of oversight and accountability that could be compromised by a purely local selection process. Overall, the District of Columbia Prosecutor Home Rule Act is a contentious piece of legislation that raises important questions about the balance of power between the federal government and local jurisdictions. Its passage would represent a significant shift in the relationship between the District of Columbia and the federal government, with potential implications for the legal system and governance of the nation's capital.
The bill proposes that the District of Columbia be allowed to select its own prosecutor through a local election process, similar to how other states and territories select their own attorneys general. This would give the residents of the District more control over who represents them in legal matters and ensure that the prosecutor is accountable to the local community.
Supporters of the bill argue that it is a necessary step towards granting the District of Columbia full autonomy and self-governance. They believe that allowing the District to select its own prosecutor will lead to a more responsive and accountable legal system that better serves the needs of the local residents. Opponents of the bill, however, raise concerns about the potential for political interference in the selection process and the impact it could have on the impartiality of the prosecutor's office. They argue that the current system, while imperfect, provides a level of oversight and accountability that could be compromised by a purely local selection process. Overall, the District of Columbia Prosecutor Home Rule Act is a contentious piece of legislation that raises important questions about the balance of power between the federal government and local jurisdictions. Its passage would represent a significant shift in the relationship between the District of Columbia and the federal government, with potential implications for the legal system and governance of the nation's capital.
Congressional Summary of HR 387
District of Columbia Prosecutor Home Rule Act
This bill shifts the responsibility for prosecuting violations of the laws, ordinances, and regulations of the District of Columbia (DC) to a local prosecutor's office. Currently, the responsibility for prosecuting such violations is shared between DC and the federal government.
Read the Full Bill
Current Status of Bill HR 387
Bill HR 387 is currently in the status of Bill Introduced since January 17, 2023. Bill HR 387 was introduced during Congress 118 and was introduced to the House on January 17, 2023.  Bill HR 387's most recent activity was Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability. as of January 17, 2023
Bipartisan Support of Bill HR 387
Total Number of Sponsors
1Democrat Sponsors
1Republican Sponsors
0Unaffiliated Sponsors
0Total Number of Cosponsors
0Democrat Cosponsors
0Republican Cosponsors
0Unaffiliated Cosponsors
0Policy Area and Potential Impact of Bill HR 387
Primary Policy Focus
Government Operations and PoliticsPotential Impact Areas
- Congressional oversight
- Criminal investigation, prosecution, interrogation
- Criminal procedure and sentencing
- District of Columbia
- Government employee pay, benefits, personnel management
- Intergovernmental relations
- Law enforcement administration and funding
- Legislative rules and procedure
- State and local government operations
Alternate Title(s) of Bill HR 387
District of Columbia Prosecutor Home Rule Act
District of Columbia Prosecutor Home Rule Act
To assign the responsibility for conducting prosecutions for violations of the laws of the District of Columbia to the head of a local prosecutor's office designated under local law of the District of Columbia.
Comments
Sponsors and Cosponsors of HR 387
Latest Bills
Reliable Federal Infrastructure Act
Bill HR 4690April 28, 2026
FIRE Act
Bill HR 6387April 28, 2026
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to the withdrawal of the rule relating to "The Fair Credit Reporting Act's Limited Preemption of State Laws".
Bill SJRES 129April 28, 2026
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to the withdrawal of the rule relating to "Debt Collection Practices (Regulation F); Pay-to-Pay Fees".
Bill SJRES 125April 28, 2026
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to the withdrawal of the rule relating to "Fair Credit Reporting; File Disclosure".
Bill SJRES 127April 28, 2026
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to the withdrawal of the rule relating to "Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (Regulation F); Time-Barred Debt".
Bill SJRES 126April 28, 2026
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to the withdrawal of the rule relating to "Fair Credit Reporting; Background Screening".
Bill SJRES 133April 28, 2026
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to the withdrawal of the rule relating to "Consumer Financial Protection Circular 2024-03: Unlawful and Unenforceable Contract Terms and Conditions".
Bill SJRES 128April 28, 2026
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to withdrawal of the rule relating to "Consumer Financial Protection Circular 2024-05: Improper Overdraft Opt-In Practices".
Bill SJRES 130April 28, 2026
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to the withdrawal of the rule relating to "Consumer Financial Protection Circular 2024-02: Deceptive Marketing Practices About the Speed or Cost of Sending a Remittance Transfer".
Bill SJRES 131April 28, 2026
