Rural Broadband Protection Act of 2025

2/14/2025, 1:56 PM

Summary of Bill S 98

Bill 119 s 98, also known as the "High-Cost Universal Service Program Funding Vetting Process Act," is a proposed piece of legislation that aims to require the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to establish a vetting process for individuals or organizations seeking funding through the high-cost universal service program.

The high-cost universal service program is a federal program that provides funding to help ensure that all Americans have access to affordable and reliable telecommunications services, particularly in rural and underserved areas. The program is intended to bridge the digital divide and promote universal access to communication services.

Under this bill, the FCC would be tasked with creating a formal process for evaluating and approving applicants for funding through the high-cost universal service program. This vetting process would likely involve assessing the qualifications and capabilities of prospective applicants to ensure that the funds are being allocated effectively and efficiently. The purpose of this legislation is to increase transparency and accountability in the distribution of funds through the high-cost universal service program, ultimately ensuring that the program is achieving its intended goals of expanding access to communication services for all Americans. Overall, Bill 119 s 98 seeks to improve the administration of the high-cost universal service program by implementing a vetting process that will help to identify and support qualified applicants who can effectively utilize the funding to expand access to telecommunications services in underserved communities.

Congressional Summary of S 98

Rural Broadband Protection Act of 2025

This bill requires the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to establish a process to vet applicants for certain funding programs that support affordable broadband deployment in high-cost areas, including rural communities.

Specifically, the FCC must conduct a rulemaking to develop a vetting process for applicants seeking funding under high-cost universal service programs for the deployment of a broadband-capable network and the provision of supported services over the network. The FCC must require applications for such funding to document each applicant’s technical, financial, and operational capabilities related to the proposed deployment, as well as a reasonable business plan. 

The FCC must evaluate applications against reasonable and well-established standards and must consider each applicant’s history of compliance with the requirements of other government broadband funding programs. After the rulemaking is finalized, funds may only be awarded to applicants that satisfy the standards established therein. 

Finally, the FCC must set financial penalties for applicants that default in some manner during the evaluation process before they are authorized to begin receiving support.  

Current Status of Bill S 98

Bill S 98 is currently in the status of Bill Introduced since January 15, 2025. Bill S 98 was introduced during Congress 119 and was introduced to the Senate on January 15, 2025.  Bill S 98's most recent activity was Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably. as of February 5, 2025

Bipartisan Support of Bill S 98

Total Number of Sponsors
5
Democrat Sponsors
0
Republican Sponsors
5
Unaffiliated Sponsors
0
Total Number of Cosponsors
2
Democrat Cosponsors
1
Republican Cosponsors
1
Unaffiliated Cosponsors
0

Policy Area and Potential Impact of Bill S 98

Primary Policy Focus

Science, Technology, Communications

Alternate Title(s) of Bill S 98

A bill to require the Federal Communications Commission to establish a vetting process for prospective applicants for high-cost universal service program funding.A bill to require the Federal Communications Commission to establish a vetting process for prospective applicants for high-cost universal service program funding.
Start holding our government accountable!

Comments