8
14
14
NORRA of 2025
4/30/2025, 12:26 AM
Summary of Bill HR 1526
Bill 119 hr 1526, also known as the "Injunctive Relief Limitation Act," aims to amend title 28 of the United States Code in order to restrict the power of district courts to grant injunctive relief. Injunctive relief is a court-ordered remedy that requires a party to do or refrain from doing a certain action.
The bill seeks to limit the authority of district courts to provide injunctive relief in order to prevent what some lawmakers see as judicial overreach. The bill's supporters argue that district courts have been too quick to issue injunctions, which can disrupt the functioning of government agencies and businesses.
If passed, the bill would place restrictions on when district courts can issue injunctive relief, requiring them to consider factors such as the likelihood of success on the merits and the potential harm to the parties involved. The bill also includes provisions for expedited review of injunctions and limits on the duration of injunctions. Opponents of the bill argue that it could undermine the ability of courts to protect individuals and groups from government overreach and other abuses of power. They argue that injunctive relief is an important tool for ensuring that the government and other entities comply with the law. Overall, Bill 119 hr 1526 is a controversial piece of legislation that seeks to limit the power of district courts to grant injunctive relief. Supporters believe it will prevent judicial overreach, while opponents argue that it could undermine the ability of courts to protect individuals and groups from abuse of power.
The bill seeks to limit the authority of district courts to provide injunctive relief in order to prevent what some lawmakers see as judicial overreach. The bill's supporters argue that district courts have been too quick to issue injunctions, which can disrupt the functioning of government agencies and businesses.
If passed, the bill would place restrictions on when district courts can issue injunctive relief, requiring them to consider factors such as the likelihood of success on the merits and the potential harm to the parties involved. The bill also includes provisions for expedited review of injunctions and limits on the duration of injunctions. Opponents of the bill argue that it could undermine the ability of courts to protect individuals and groups from government overreach and other abuses of power. They argue that injunctive relief is an important tool for ensuring that the government and other entities comply with the law. Overall, Bill 119 hr 1526 is a controversial piece of legislation that seeks to limit the power of district courts to grant injunctive relief. Supporters believe it will prevent judicial overreach, while opponents argue that it could undermine the ability of courts to protect individuals and groups from abuse of power.
Congressional Summary of HR 1526
No Rogue Rulings Act or NORRA
This bill limits the authority of federal district courts to issue injunctions.
Specifically, it prohibits a district court from issuing an injunction unless the injunction applies only to the parties of the particular case before the court.
Read the Full Bill
Current Status of Bill HR 1526
Bill HR 1526 is currently in the status of Introduced to Senate since April 10, 2025. Bill HR 1526 was introduced during Congress 119 and was introduced to the House on February 24, 2025. Bill HR 1526's most recent activity was Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. as of April 10, 2025
Bipartisan Support of Bill HR 1526
Total Number of Sponsors
23Democrat Sponsors
0Republican Sponsors
23Unaffiliated Sponsors
0Total Number of Cosponsors
35Democrat Cosponsors
0Republican Cosponsors
35Unaffiliated Cosponsors
0Policy Area and Potential Impact of Bill HR 1526
Primary Policy Focus
LawAlternate Title(s) of Bill HR 1526
To amend title 28, United States Code, to limit the authority of district courts to provide injunctive relief, and for other purposes.
To amend title 28, United States Code, to limit the authority of district courts to provide injunctive relief, and for other purposes.
Comments

Mac Bruce
447
8 months ago
This bill is so dumb, it's gonna mess everything up for us regular folks. Who even comes up with this stuff? It's gonna hurt a lot of people, including me.

Lorelai Zhu
479
8 months ago
This bill is bad. It will hurt us.

Ander Glass
443
8 months ago
I don't really care about this bill, but if it helps me out, then I guess it's fine.

Brielle O'Donnell
413
8 months ago
What does this bill mean for me and my family in Kansas?
Sponsors and Cosponsors of HR 1526
Latest Bills
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 521 Thorn Street in Sewickley, Pennsylvania, as the "Mary Elizabeth 'Bettie' Cole Post Office Building".
Bill HR 1461December 11, 2025
Secure Rural Schools Reauthorization Act of 2025
Bill S 356December 11, 2025
Expanding Whistleblower Protections for Contractors Act of 2025
Bill S 874December 11, 2025
Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians Land Transfer Act of 2025
Bill HR 2302December 11, 2025
Adams Memorial-Great American Heroes Act
Bill HR 2306December 11, 2025
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 130 South Patterson Avenue in Santa Barbara, California, as the "Brigadier General Frederick R. Lopez Post Office Building".
Bill HR 2175December 11, 2025
Electric Supply Chain Act
Bill HR 3638December 11, 2025
A bill to require the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to disinter the remains of Fernando V. Cota from Fort Sam Houston National Cemetery, Texas, and for other purposes.
Bill S 1071December 11, 2025
PERMIT Act
Bill HR 3898December 11, 2025
State Planning for Reliability and Affordability Act
Bill HR 3628December 11, 2025
Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 18) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Institutions''; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 28) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to ''Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications''; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1526) to amend title 28, United States Code, to limit the authority of district courts to provide injunctive relief, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 22) to amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to require proof of United States citizenship to register an individual to vote in elections for Federal office, and for other purposes; and for other purposes.
Bill HRES 282April 9, 2025
Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 18) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Institutions"; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 28) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications"; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1526) to amend title 28, United States Code, to limit the authority of district courts to provide injunctive relief, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 22) to amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to require proof of United States citizenship to register an individual to vote in elections for Federal office, and for other purposes; and for other purposes.
Bill HRES 294April 10, 2025





