6
4
4
A bill to designate the Pride flag as an authorized flag eligible for display at units of the National Park System, to express the sense of the Senate that the Pride flag should be on display at the Stonewall National Monument in the State of New York, and for other purposes.
3/13/2026, 10:30 PM
Summary of Bill S 3911
The bill, introduced in the 119th Congress, is designed to designate the Pride flag as an authorized flag for display at National Park System units. It also aims to express the Senate's view that the Pride flag should be visible at the Stonewall National Monument in New York State.
Read the Full Bill
Current Status of Bill S 3911
Bill S 3911 is currently in the status of Bill Introduced since February 25, 2026. Bill S 3911 was introduced during Congress 119 and was introduced to the Senate on February 25, 2026. Bill S 3911's most recent activity was Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. as of February 25, 2026
Bipartisan Support of Bill S 3911
Total Number of Sponsors
1Democrat Sponsors
1Republican Sponsors
0Unaffiliated Sponsors
0Total Number of Cosponsors
1Democrat Cosponsors
1Republican Cosponsors
0Unaffiliated Cosponsors
0Policy Area and Potential Impact of Bill S 3911
Primary Policy Focus
Public Lands and Natural ResourcesAlternate Title(s) of Bill S 3911
A bill to designate the Pride flag as an authorized flag eligible for display at units of the National Park System, to express the sense of the Senate that the Pride flag should be on display at the Stonewall National Monument in the State of New York, and for other purposes.
A bill to designate the Pride flag as an authorized flag eligible for display at units of the National Park System, to express the sense of the Senate that the Pride flag should be on display at the Stonewall National Monument in the State of New York, and for other purposes.
Comments
Lorelai Zhu
1,048
6 months ago
I oppose displaying the Pride flag at national parks. It's unnecessary and divisive. #UnitedStatesSBill3911
Mordechai Shore
1,160
6 months ago
I don't know much about this bill, but it seems like a waste of time and resources. Why do we need to designate the Pride flag as an authorized flag for National Parks? It just seems unnecessary. I'm not sure how this will affect me personally, but it just doesn't sit right with me. #confused #unnecessary
Sponsors and Cosponsors of S 3911
Latest Bills
TRAPS Act
Bill HR 4936September 18, 2026
Apples to Apples Comparison Act of 2025
Bill HR 4093September 18, 2026
American Lending Fairness Act of 2026
Bill HR 7866September 18, 2026
Civil Investigative Demand Reform Act of 2025
Bill HR 1653September 18, 2026
American Reserve Modernization Act of 2026
Bill HR 8957September 18, 2026
Preventive Health Savings Act
Bill HR 4464September 18, 2026
PEARL Act
Bill HR 9327September 18, 2026
Medically Tailored Home-Delivered Meals Program Pilot Act
Bill HR 5439September 18, 2026
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 117 West Lovett Street in Charlotte, Michigan, as the "Francis C. Flaherty Post Office Building".
Bill HR 9570September 18, 2026
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1019 Avenue H in Fort Madison, Iowa, as the "Martin L. Graber Post Office".
Bill HR 4707September 18, 2026
To designate the Pride flag as an authorized flag eligible for display at units of the National Park System, to express the sense of Congress that the Pride flag should be on display at the Stonewall National Monument in the State of New York, and for other purposes.
Bill HR 7659March 13, 2026