0
A bill to amend the Federal Agriculture Improvement and Reform Act of 1996 to ensure that producers who rely on acequia systems have access to drought protections, and for other purposes.
1/24/2025, 11:56 AM
Summary of Bill S 228
The bill seeks to ensure that producers who use acequia systems have access to the same drought protections as other agricultural producers. This includes access to federal assistance programs and resources to help mitigate the impacts of drought on their crops and livelihoods.
In addition to providing drought protections, the bill also aims to support the preservation and maintenance of acequia systems, which play a crucial role in sustaining agriculture in arid regions. By recognizing the unique needs of producers who rely on acequias, the bill seeks to promote sustainable agriculture practices and ensure the continued viability of these traditional irrigation systems. Overall, the Acequia Drought Protection Act is a bipartisan effort to address the specific challenges faced by producers who rely on acequia systems and to ensure that they have the support they need to weather drought conditions and continue to contribute to the agricultural economy.
Congressional Summary of S 228
Acequia Communities Empowered by Qualifying Upgrades for Infrastructure Act
This bill specifies that agricultural producers who rely on acequia systems are eligible to receive assistance under the Noninsured Crop Disaster Assistance Program for all losses suffered as a result of drought, flood, or other natural disasters. Acequias, or community ditches, are community-operated and -organized water irrigation systems.
The bill also provides that a special use permit shall not be required on Department of Agriculture (USDA) or Department of the Interior land for the (1) presence or use of an acequia or the use of the acequia's water, or (2) routine maintenance and minor improvements conducted by a community user or governing body of an acequia.
Further, USDA must submit a report to Congress on agricultural producers who rely on acequia systems.
Current Status of Bill S 228
Bipartisan Support of Bill S 228
Total Number of Sponsors
1Democrat Sponsors
1Republican Sponsors
0Unaffiliated Sponsors
0Total Number of Cosponsors
1Democrat Cosponsors
0Republican Cosponsors
1Unaffiliated Cosponsors
0Policy Area and Potential Impact of Bill S 228
Primary Policy Focus
Alternate Title(s) of Bill S 228
Comments

Royalty Pruitt
1 year ago
I don't agree with this bill. It's just another example of government overreach. Why should certain producers get special protections when others don't? It's not fair and it's not right. This bill needs to be reevaluated and revised.

