Royalty Pruitt

strengthen the Integrated Coastal and Ocean Observation System (ICOOS) Act of 2009. The ICOOS Act was originally passed to establish a national system for monitoring and observing the coastal and oceanic environments of the United States. The reauthorization of this act would ensure that the ICOOS continues to receive funding and support for its important work in collecting and disseminating data on coastal and oceanic conditions. This data is crucial for a variety of purposes, including monitoring water quality, predicting weather patterns, and supporting marine research and conservation efforts. The bill includes provisions for improving coordination and collaboration among federal, state, and local agencies involved in coastal and ocean observation, as well as for enhancing public access to the data collected by the ICOOS. It also calls for the development of a strategic plan to guide the future direction of the ICOOS and ensure that it remains a valuable resource for policymakers, researchers, and the general public. Overall, Bill 119 HR 2294 represents a bipartisan effort to support and strengthen the ICOOS, recognizing the importance of monitoring and understanding our coastal and oceanic environments for the benefit of all Americans.

Recent Activity

Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Alternative Names

To reauthorize the Integrated Coastal and Ocean Observation System Act of 2009.

To reauthorize the Integrated Coastal and Ocean Observation System Act of 2009.

To reauthorize the Integrated Coastal and Ocean Observation System Act of 2009.

To reauthorize the Integrated Coastal and Ocean Observation System Act of 2009.

To reauthorize the Integrated Coastal and Ocean Observation System Act of 2009.

To reauthorize the Integrated Coastal and Ocean Observation System Act of 2009.

Associated Legislation

undefined

Policy Areas

undefined

Potential Impact

undefined

Sponsors and Supporters

Rep. Ezell, Mike [R-MS-4]

Rep. Ezell, Mike [R-MS-4]

Rep. Ezell, Mike [R-MS-4]

Rep. Ezell, Mike [R-MS-4]

Rep. Ezell, Mike [R-MS-4]

Rep. Ezell, Mike [R-MS-4]

Cosponsors and Supporters

Rep. Bonamici, Suzanne [D-OR-1]

Rep. Weber, Randy K. Sr. [R-TX-14]

Rep. Dingell, Debbie [D-MI-6]

Del. Radewagen, Aumua Amata Coleman [R-AS-At Large]

Rep. Davis, Danny K. [D-IL-7]

Rep. Bonamici, Suzanne [D-OR-1]

Rep. Weber, Randy K. Sr. [R-TX-14]

Rep. Dingell, Debbie [D-MI-6]

Del. Radewagen, Aumua Amata Coleman [R-AS-At Large]

Rep. Davis, Danny K. [D-IL-7]

Rep. Harder, Josh [D-CA-9]

Rep. Casten, Sean [D-IL-6]

Rep. Case, Ed [D-HI-1]

Rep. Rutherford, John H. [R-FL-5]

Rep. Smith, Adam [D-WA-9]

Rep. Webster, Daniel [R-FL-11]

Rep. Haridopolos, Mike [R-FL-8]

Rep. Tokuda, Jill N. [D-HI-2]

Rep. Bonamici, Suzanne [D-OR-1]

Rep. Weber, Randy K. Sr. [R-TX-14]

Rep. Dingell, Debbie [D-MI-6]

Del. Radewagen, Aumua Amata Coleman [R-AS-At Large]

Rep. Davis, Danny K. [D-IL-7]

Rep. Harder, Josh [D-CA-9]

Rep. Casten, Sean [D-IL-6]

Rep. Case, Ed [D-HI-1]

Rep. Rutherford, John H. [R-FL-5]

Rep. Smith, Adam [D-WA-9]

Rep. Webster, Daniel [R-FL-11]

Rep. Haridopolos, Mike [R-FL-8]

Rep. Tokuda, Jill N. [D-HI-2]

Rep. Amo, Gabe [D-RI-1]

Committees and Subcommittees

Science, Space, and Technology Committee

Natural Resources Committee

Variations and Revisions

United States Congress. The bill aims to raise awareness about myositis, a group of rare autoimmune diseases that cause muscle weakness and inflammation. If passed, the bill would officially designate May 2025 as National Myositis Awareness Month, encouraging individuals, organizations, and communities to educate themselves about the disease and support those affected by it. The bill highlights the importance of early detection, diagnosis, and treatment of myositis, as well as the need for increased research funding to better understand and find a cure for the disease. Overall, Bill 119 H.Res. 277 seeks to bring attention to myositis and its impact on individuals and families, with the goal of improving outcomes and quality of life for those living with the disease.

Recent Activity

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Alternative Names

Supporting the designation of May 2025 as "National Myositis Awareness Month".

Supporting the designation of May 2025 as "National Myositis Awareness Month".

Associated Legislation

undefined

Policy Areas

Health

Potential Impact

undefined

Sponsors and Supporters

Rep. McCormick, Richard [R-GA-7]

Rep. McCormick, Richard [R-GA-7]

Rep. McCormick, Richard [R-GA-7]

Cosponsors and Supporters

undefined

Committees and Subcommittees

Energy and Commerce Committee

Variations and Revisions

undefined

of district courts to grant injunctive relief. Injunctive relief is a court-ordered remedy that requires a party to do or refrain from doing a certain action. The bill seeks to limit the authority of district courts to provide injunctive relief in order to prevent what some lawmakers see as judicial overreach. The bill's supporters argue that district courts have been too quick to issue injunctions, which can disrupt the functioning of government agencies and businesses. If passed, the bill would place restrictions on when district courts can issue injunctive relief, requiring them to consider factors such as the likelihood of success on the merits and the potential harm to the parties involved. The bill also includes provisions for expedited review of injunctions and limits on the duration of injunctions. Opponents of the bill argue that it could undermine the ability of courts to protect individuals and groups from government overreach and other abuses of power. They argue that injunctive relief is an important tool for ensuring that the government and other entities comply with the law. Overall, Bill 119 hr 1526 is a controversial piece of legislation that seeks to limit the power of district courts to grant injunctive relief. Supporters believe it will prevent judicial overreach, while opponents argue that it could undermine the ability of courts to protect individuals and groups from abuse of power.

Recent Activity

Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 282 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 22, H.R. 1526, S.J. Res. 18 and S.J. Res. 28. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 22, H.R. 1526, S.J. Res. 18, and S.J. Res. 28 under a closed rule. The resolution provides for one hour of debate on each measure and one motion to recommit on H.R. 22 and H.R. 1526, and one motion to commit on S.J. Res. 18 and S.J. Res. 28. The resolution also provides that H. Res. 23 and H. Res. 164 are laid on the table.

Alternative Names

To amend title 28, United States Code, to limit the authority of district courts to provide injunctive relief, and for other purposes.

To amend title 28, United States Code, to limit the authority of district courts to provide injunctive relief, and for other purposes.

No Rogue Rulings Act

No Rogue Rulings Act

To amend title 28, United States Code, to limit the authority of district courts to provide injunctive relief, and for other purposes.

NORRA of 2025

NORRA of 2025

No Rogue Rulings Act of 2025

No Rogue Rulings Act

To amend title 28, United States Code, to limit the authority of district courts to provide injunctive relief, and for other purposes.

Associated Legislation

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 18) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Institutions''; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 28) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to ''Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications''; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1526) to amend title 28, United States Code, to limit the authority of district courts to provide injunctive relief, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 22) to amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to require proof of United States citizenship to register an individual to vote in elections for Federal office, and for other purposes; and for other purposes.

Policy Areas

Law

Potential Impact

Sponsors and Supporters

Rep. Issa, Darrell [R-CA-48]

Rep. Issa, Darrell [R-CA-48]

Rep. Issa, Darrell [R-CA-48]

Rep. Issa, Darrell [R-CA-48]

Rep. Issa, Darrell [R-CA-48]

Rep. Issa, Darrell [R-CA-48]

Rep. Issa, Darrell [R-CA-48]

Rep. Issa, Darrell [R-CA-48]

Rep. Issa, Darrell [R-CA-48]

Rep. Issa, Darrell [R-CA-48]

Rep. Issa, Darrell [R-CA-48]

Rep. Issa, Darrell [R-CA-48]

Rep. Issa, Darrell [R-CA-48]

Cosponsors and Supporters

Rep. Van Orden, Derrick [R-WI-3]

Rep. Weber, Randy K. Sr. [R-TX-14]

Rep. Van Orden, Derrick [R-WI-3]

Rep. Weber, Randy K. Sr. [R-TX-14]

Rep. Gooden, Lance [R-TX-5]

Rep. Harris, Mark [R-NC-8]

Rep. Luna, Anna Paulina [R-FL-13]

Rep. Schmidt, Derek [R-KS-2]

Rep. Tenney, Claudia [R-NY-24]

Rep. Van Orden, Derrick [R-WI-3]

Rep. Weber, Randy K. Sr. [R-TX-14]

Rep. Gooden, Lance [R-TX-5]

Rep. Harris, Mark [R-NC-8]

Rep. Luna, Anna Paulina [R-FL-13]

Rep. Schmidt, Derek [R-KS-2]

Rep. Tenney, Claudia [R-NY-24]

Rep. Langworthy, Nicholas A. [R-NY-23]

Rep. McGuire, John [R-VA-5]

Rep. Self, Keith [R-TX-3]

Rep. Higgins, Clay [R-LA-3]

Rep. Meuser, Daniel [R-PA-9]

Rep. Van Orden, Derrick [R-WI-3]

Rep. Weber, Randy K. Sr. [R-TX-14]

Rep. Gooden, Lance [R-TX-5]

Rep. Harris, Mark [R-NC-8]

Rep. Luna, Anna Paulina [R-FL-13]

Rep. Schmidt, Derek [R-KS-2]

Rep. Tenney, Claudia [R-NY-24]

Rep. Langworthy, Nicholas A. [R-NY-23]

Rep. McGuire, John [R-VA-5]

Rep. Self, Keith [R-TX-3]

Rep. Higgins, Clay [R-LA-3]

Rep. Meuser, Daniel [R-PA-9]

Rep. Babin, Brian [R-TX-36]

Rep. LaLota, Nick [R-NY-1]

Committees and Subcommittees

Judiciary Committee

Judiciary Committee

Judiciary Committee

Variations and Revisions

ifically targets institutions of higher education that receive federal student assistance programs, prohibiting them from giving preferential treatment in the admissions process to legacy students or donors. Legacy students are those who have family members who previously attended the institution, while donors are individuals or organizations that have made significant financial contributions to the school. The bill seeks to level the playing field in the college admissions process by ensuring that all applicants are considered based on their merits and qualifications, rather than their family connections or financial contributions. If passed, this legislation would have a significant impact on the admissions policies of many colleges and universities across the country. Supporters of the bill argue that it is necessary to promote fairness and equity in higher education, while critics may argue that it could potentially limit the ability of institutions to raise funds from donors. Overall, Bill 119 s 880 represents an important step towards ensuring that the college admissions process is based on merit and fairness, rather than privilege and wealth. It will be interesting to see how this legislation progresses through Congress and what impact it may have on the higher education system in the United States.

Recent Activity

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.

Alternative Names

A bill to amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to prohibit institutions of higher education participating in Federal student assistance programs from giving preferential treatment in the admissions process to legacy students or donors.

A bill to amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to prohibit institutions of higher education participating in Federal student assistance programs from giving preferential treatment in the admissions process to legacy students or donors.

Fair College Admissions for Students Act

Fair College Admissions for Students Act

A bill to amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to prohibit institutions of higher education participating in Federal student assistance programs from giving preferential treatment in the admissions process to legacy students or donors.

Associated Legislation

undefined

Policy Areas

Education

Potential Impact

undefined

Sponsors and Supporters

Sen. Merkley, Jeff [D-OR]

Sen. Merkley, Jeff [D-OR]

Sen. Merkley, Jeff [D-OR]

Cosponsors and Supporters

Sen. Kennedy, John [R-LA]

Sen. Padilla, Alex [D-CA]

Committees and Subcommittees

Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee

Variations and Revisions

export and import of natural gas in the United States. The bill seeks to remove barriers that prevent American companies from freely trading natural gas with other countries. Currently, there are restrictions in place that limit the amount of natural gas that can be exported from the US. These restrictions were put in place to protect domestic consumers and ensure that there is an adequate supply of natural gas within the country. However, proponents of Bill 119 HR 1949 argue that these restrictions are outdated and hinder the ability of American companies to compete in the global market. If passed, the bill would allow US companies to export natural gas to countries that are in need of energy resources. This could potentially open up new markets for American natural gas producers and increase revenue for the US economy. Additionally, the bill would also allow for the import of natural gas from other countries, providing American consumers with access to a wider range of energy sources. Opponents of the bill argue that lifting restrictions on the export and import of natural gas could lead to higher prices for domestic consumers and potentially harm the environment. They also raise concerns about the impact that increased natural gas production and transportation could have on local communities and ecosystems. Overall, Bill 119 HR 1949 is a contentious piece of legislation that has the potential to significantly impact the US energy market. Supporters believe that it will boost the economy and create new opportunities for American companies, while opponents are concerned about the potential negative consequences for consumers and the environment.

Recent Activity

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Alternative Names

To repeal restrictions on the export and import of natural gas.

To repeal restrictions on the export and import of natural gas.

Unlocking our Domestic LNG Potential Act of 2025

Unlocking our Domestic LNG Potential Act of 2025

To repeal restrictions on the export and import of natural gas.

Associated Legislation

undefined

Policy Areas

Energy

Potential Impact

Sponsors and Supporters

Rep. Pfluger, August [R-TX-11]

Rep. Pfluger, August [R-TX-11]

Rep. Pfluger, August [R-TX-11]

Rep. Pfluger, August [R-TX-11]

Rep. Pfluger, August [R-TX-11]

Rep. Pfluger, August [R-TX-11]

Rep. Pfluger, August [R-TX-11]

Cosponsors and Supporters

Rep. Joyce, John [R-PA-13]

Rep. Letlow, Julia [R-LA-5]

Rep. Spartz, Victoria [R-IN-5]

Rep. Boebert, Lauren [R-CO-4]

Rep. Bice, Stephanie I. [R-OK-5]

Rep. Williams, Roger [R-TX-25]

Rep. Balderson, Troy [R-OH-12]

Rep. Goldman, Craig [R-TX-12]

Rep. Crenshaw, Dan [R-TX-2]

Rep. Weber, Randy K. Sr. [R-TX-14]

Rep. Arrington, Jodey C. [R-TX-19]

Rep. Newhouse, Dan [R-WA-4]

Rep. Ellzey, Jake [R-TX-6]

Rep. Sessions, Pete [R-TX-17]

Rep. Babin, Brian [R-TX-36]

Rep. Carter, John R. [R-TX-31]

Rep. Higgins, Clay [R-LA-3]

Rep. Miller, Carol D. [R-WV-1]

Rep. Hageman, Harriet M. [R-WY-At Large]

Rep. Joyce, John [R-PA-13]

Rep. Letlow, Julia [R-LA-5]

Rep. Spartz, Victoria [R-IN-5]

Rep. Boebert, Lauren [R-CO-4]

Rep. Bice, Stephanie I. [R-OK-5]

Rep. Williams, Roger [R-TX-25]

Rep. Balderson, Troy [R-OH-12]

Rep. Goldman, Craig [R-TX-12]

Rep. Crenshaw, Dan [R-TX-2]

Rep. Weber, Randy K. Sr. [R-TX-14]

Rep. Arrington, Jodey C. [R-TX-19]

Rep. Newhouse, Dan [R-WA-4]

Rep. Ellzey, Jake [R-TX-6]

Rep. Sessions, Pete [R-TX-17]

Rep. Babin, Brian [R-TX-36]

Rep. Carter, John R. [R-TX-31]

Rep. Higgins, Clay [R-LA-3]

Rep. Miller, Carol D. [R-WV-1]

Rep. Hageman, Harriet M. [R-WY-At Large]

Rep. Evans, Gabe [R-CO-8]

Rep. Hudson, Richard [R-NC-9]

Rep. Mann, Tracey [R-KS-1]

Rep. Shreve, Jefferson [R-IN-6]

Rep. Joyce, John [R-PA-13]

Rep. Letlow, Julia [R-LA-5]

Rep. Spartz, Victoria [R-IN-5]

Rep. Boebert, Lauren [R-CO-4]

Rep. Bice, Stephanie I. [R-OK-5]

Rep. Williams, Roger [R-TX-25]

Rep. Balderson, Troy [R-OH-12]

Rep. Goldman, Craig [R-TX-12]

Rep. Crenshaw, Dan [R-TX-2]

Rep. Weber, Randy K. Sr. [R-TX-14]

Rep. Arrington, Jodey C. [R-TX-19]

Rep. Newhouse, Dan [R-WA-4]

Rep. Ellzey, Jake [R-TX-6]

Rep. Sessions, Pete [R-TX-17]

Rep. Babin, Brian [R-TX-36]

Rep. Carter, John R. [R-TX-31]

Rep. Higgins, Clay [R-LA-3]

Rep. Miller, Carol D. [R-WV-1]

Rep. Hageman, Harriet M. [R-WY-At Large]

Rep. Evans, Gabe [R-CO-8]

Rep. Hudson, Richard [R-NC-9]

Rep. Mann, Tracey [R-KS-1]

Rep. Shreve, Jefferson [R-IN-6]

Rep. Luttrell, Morgan [R-TX-8]

Rep. Palmer, Gary J. [R-AL-6]

Rep. McDowell, Addison [R-NC-6]

Rep. Joyce, John [R-PA-13]

Rep. Letlow, Julia [R-LA-5]

Rep. Spartz, Victoria [R-IN-5]

Rep. Boebert, Lauren [R-CO-4]

Rep. Bice, Stephanie I. [R-OK-5]

Rep. Williams, Roger [R-TX-25]

Rep. Balderson, Troy [R-OH-12]

Rep. Goldman, Craig [R-TX-12]

Rep. Crenshaw, Dan [R-TX-2]

Rep. Weber, Randy K. Sr. [R-TX-14]

Rep. Arrington, Jodey C. [R-TX-19]

Rep. Newhouse, Dan [R-WA-4]

Rep. Ellzey, Jake [R-TX-6]

Rep. Sessions, Pete [R-TX-17]

Rep. Babin, Brian [R-TX-36]

Rep. Carter, John R. [R-TX-31]

Rep. Higgins, Clay [R-LA-3]

Rep. Miller, Carol D. [R-WV-1]

Rep. Hageman, Harriet M. [R-WY-At Large]

Rep. Evans, Gabe [R-CO-8]

Rep. Hudson, Richard [R-NC-9]

Rep. Mann, Tracey [R-KS-1]

Rep. Shreve, Jefferson [R-IN-6]

Rep. Luttrell, Morgan [R-TX-8]

Rep. Palmer, Gary J. [R-AL-6]

Rep. McDowell, Addison [R-NC-6]

Rep. Griffith, H. Morgan [R-VA-9]

Rep. Clyde, Andrew S. [R-GA-9]

Rep. Bilirakis, Gus M. [R-FL-12]

Committees and Subcommittees

Energy and Commerce Committee

Variations and Revisions