0
0

Recognizing the significance of the Greensboro Four sit-in during Black History Month.

2/13/2025, 9:06 AM

Summary of Bill HRES 95

Bill 119 HRES 95, also known as the Greensboro Four sit-in resolution, is a piece of legislation that recognizes the historical significance of the Greensboro Four sit-in during Black History Month. The Greensboro Four sit-in took place on February 1, 1960, when four African American college students from North Carolina A&T State University sat down at a segregated lunch counter in Greensboro, North Carolina, and refused to leave until they were served.

The resolution acknowledges the bravery and determination of the Greensboro Four – Franklin McCain, Joseph McNeil, Ezell Blair Jr., and David Richmond – in peacefully protesting against racial segregation and discrimination. It also highlights the impact of their actions in sparking a wave of sit-ins and protests across the country, leading to the desegregation of public facilities and the eventual passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

Furthermore, the resolution emphasizes the importance of remembering and honoring the contributions of African Americans to the civil rights movement and the ongoing struggle for equality and justice. It calls on all Americans to reflect on the legacy of the Greensboro Four and to continue working towards a more inclusive and equitable society. In conclusion, Bill 119 HRES 95 is a bipartisan effort to recognize and commemorate the Greensboro Four sit-in as a pivotal moment in American history, particularly during Black History Month. It serves as a reminder of the power of peaceful protest and the importance of standing up against injustice.

Congressional Summary of HRES 95

This resolution recognizes (1) the Greensboro Four for their contributions to the civil rights movement and the significant role they played as a catalyst for the formation of the Student Non-Violent Coordinating Committee, (2) the value of ethnic and racial diversity in the United States, and (3) the continued importance of sit-ins as an effective form of nonviolent resistance. The resolution also encourages states to include information about the Greensboro Four in their educational curriculums.

Current Status of Bill HRES 95

Bill HRES 95 is currently in the status of Introduced to House since February 4, 2025. Bill HRES 95 was introduced during Congress 119 and was introduced to the House on February 4, 2025.  Bill HRES 95's most recent activity was Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned. as of February 4, 2025

Bipartisan Support of Bill HRES 95

Total Number of Sponsors
1
Democrat Sponsors
1
Republican Sponsors
0
Unaffiliated Sponsors
0
Total Number of Cosponsors
29
Democrat Cosponsors
29
Republican Cosponsors
0
Unaffiliated Cosponsors
0

Policy Area and Potential Impact of Bill HRES 95

Primary Policy Focus

Civil Rights and Liberties, Minority Issues

Alternate Title(s) of Bill HRES 95

Recognizing the significance of the Greensboro Four sit-in during Black History Month.
Recognizing the significance of the Greensboro Four sit-in during Black History Month.

Comments

Latest Bills

A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to the withdrawal of the rule relating to "Consumer Financial Protection Circular 2022-07: Reasonable Investigation of Consumer Reporting Disputes".
Bill SJRES 173April 14, 2026
A joint resolution to direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against the Islamic Republic of Iran that have not been authorized by Congress.
Bill SJRES 172April 14, 2026
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to the withdrawal of the rule relating to "Disclosure of Consumer Complaint Narrative Data".
Bill SJRES 176April 14, 2026
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to the withdrawal of the rule relating to "Procedures for Supervisory Designation Proceedings".
Bill SJRES 178April 14, 2026
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to the withdrawal of the rule relating to "Bulletin 2015-02 re: Section 8 housing choice voucher homeownership program".
Bill SJRES 165April 14, 2026
A bill to provide for export restrictions on certain semiconductor manufacturing equipment and components therefor, and for other purposes.
Bill S 4281April 14, 2026
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to the withdrawal of the rule relating to "Compliance Bulletin 2016-03: Detecting and Preventing Consumer Harm From Production Incentives".
Bill SJRES 170April 14, 2026
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Education relating to "William D. Ford Federal Direct Loan (Direct Loan) Program".
Bill SJRES 182April 14, 2026
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to the withdrawal of the rule relating to "Consumer Information Requests to Large Banks and Credit Unions".
Bill SJRES 167April 14, 2026
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to the withdrawal of the rule relating to "Equal Credit Opportunity (Regulation B); Discrimination on the Bases of Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity".
Bill SJRES 166April 14, 2026