1
1

To amend the National Security Act of 1947 to provide the Office of the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community with law enforcement authority, and for other purposes.

6/10/2026, 8:07 AM

Summary of Bill HR 9209

The bill titled "To amend the National Security Act of 1947 to provide the Office of the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community with law enforcement authority, and for other purposes" was introduced in the 119th Congress under the designation H.R. 9209 on June 9, 2026.

Current Status of Bill HR 9209

Bill HR 9209 is currently in the status of Bill Introduced since June 9, 2026. Bill HR 9209 was introduced during Congress 119 and was introduced to the House on June 9, 2026.  Bill HR 9209's most recent activity was Referred to the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned. as of June 9, 2026

Bipartisan Support of Bill HR 9209

Total Number of Sponsors
1
Democrat Sponsors
0
Republican Sponsors
1
Unaffiliated Sponsors
0
Total Number of Cosponsors
0
Democrat Cosponsors
0
Republican Cosponsors
0
Unaffiliated Cosponsors
0

Policy Area and Potential Impact of Bill HR 9209

Primary Policy Focus

Alternate Title(s) of Bill HR 9209

To amend the National Security Act of 1947 to provide the Office of the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community with law enforcement authority, and for other purposes.
To amend the National Security Act of 1947 to provide the Office of the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community with law enforcement authority, and for other purposes.

Comments

Erin Pickett profile image

Erin Pickett

918

5 days ago

This bill sounds like a total snoozefest. Why does the Inspector General need law enforcement authority? Sounds like a power grab to me. I don't trust this at all. Did you know that this bill also includes provisions for increased surveillance on American citizens? No thanks!