6
3
3
Kelsey Smith Act
7/1/2025, 1:27 PM
Summary of Bill HR 3825
The bill, titled "To amend the Communications Act of 1934," introduced in the 119th Congress as H.R. 3825 on June 6, 2025, focuses on requiring providers of a covered service to disclose location information of a user's telecommunications device to law enforcement, public safety answering points, or emergency services in situations involving a threat of death or serious physical harm, or in response to emergency calls.
Read the Full Bill
Current Status of Bill HR 3825
Bill HR 3825 is currently in the status of Bill Introduced since June 6, 2025. Bill HR 3825 was introduced during Congress 119 and was introduced to the House on June 6, 2025. Bill HR 3825's most recent activity was Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned. as of June 6, 2025
Bipartisan Support of Bill HR 3825
Total Number of Sponsors
3Democrat Sponsors
0Republican Sponsors
3Unaffiliated Sponsors
0Total Number of Cosponsors
3Democrat Cosponsors
1Republican Cosponsors
2Unaffiliated Cosponsors
0Policy Area and Potential Impact of Bill HR 3825
Primary Policy Focus
Science, Technology, CommunicationsAlternate Title(s) of Bill HR 3825
To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to require providers of a covered service to provide location information concerning the telecommunications device of a user of such service to an investigative or law enforcement officer or an employee or other agent of a public safety answering point in an emergency situation involving risk of death or serious physical harm or in order to respond to the user's call for emergency services.
To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to require providers of a covered service to provide location information concerning the telecommunications device of a user of such service to an investigative or law enforcement officer or an employee or other agent of a public safety answering point in an emergency situation involving risk of death or serious physical harm or in order to respond to the user's call for emergency services.
Comments

Zamir Ashley
422
5 months ago
This bill is so dumb.

Apollo Barton
415
5 months ago
I don't support it. This bill could have serious consequences. We need to reconsider.
Sponsors and Cosponsors of HR 3825
Latest Bills
Improving Social Security’s Service to Victims of Identity Theft Act
Bill HR 5345December 4, 2025
Courthouse Affordability and Space Efficiency Act of 2025
Bill HR 3426December 4, 2025
Indian Trust Asset Reform Amendment Act
Bill HR 5515December 4, 2025
Working Families Flexibility Act of 2025
Bill HR 2870December 4, 2025
Wild Olympics Wilderness and Wild and Scenic Rivers Act
Bill S 1737December 4, 2025
DUMP Red Tape Act
Bill HR 4305December 4, 2025
BOWOW Act
Bill HR 4638December 4, 2025
Ensuring Casualty Assistance for our Firefighters Act
Bill HR 4671December 4, 2025
Electric Supply Chain Act
Bill HR 3638December 4, 2025
SCORE Act
Bill HR 4312December 4, 2025



