8
14
14
NORRA of 2025
4/30/2025, 12:26 AM
Summary of Bill HR 1526
Bill 119 hr 1526, also known as the "Injunctive Relief Limitation Act," aims to amend title 28 of the United States Code in order to restrict the power of district courts to grant injunctive relief. Injunctive relief is a court-ordered remedy that requires a party to do or refrain from doing a certain action.
The bill seeks to limit the authority of district courts to provide injunctive relief in order to prevent what some lawmakers see as judicial overreach. The bill's supporters argue that district courts have been too quick to issue injunctions, which can disrupt the functioning of government agencies and businesses.
If passed, the bill would place restrictions on when district courts can issue injunctive relief, requiring them to consider factors such as the likelihood of success on the merits and the potential harm to the parties involved. The bill also includes provisions for expedited review of injunctions and limits on the duration of injunctions. Opponents of the bill argue that it could undermine the ability of courts to protect individuals and groups from government overreach and other abuses of power. They argue that injunctive relief is an important tool for ensuring that the government and other entities comply with the law. Overall, Bill 119 hr 1526 is a controversial piece of legislation that seeks to limit the power of district courts to grant injunctive relief. Supporters believe it will prevent judicial overreach, while opponents argue that it could undermine the ability of courts to protect individuals and groups from abuse of power.
The bill seeks to limit the authority of district courts to provide injunctive relief in order to prevent what some lawmakers see as judicial overreach. The bill's supporters argue that district courts have been too quick to issue injunctions, which can disrupt the functioning of government agencies and businesses.
If passed, the bill would place restrictions on when district courts can issue injunctive relief, requiring them to consider factors such as the likelihood of success on the merits and the potential harm to the parties involved. The bill also includes provisions for expedited review of injunctions and limits on the duration of injunctions. Opponents of the bill argue that it could undermine the ability of courts to protect individuals and groups from government overreach and other abuses of power. They argue that injunctive relief is an important tool for ensuring that the government and other entities comply with the law. Overall, Bill 119 hr 1526 is a controversial piece of legislation that seeks to limit the power of district courts to grant injunctive relief. Supporters believe it will prevent judicial overreach, while opponents argue that it could undermine the ability of courts to protect individuals and groups from abuse of power.
Congressional Summary of HR 1526
No Rogue Rulings Act or NORRA
This bill limits the authority of federal district courts to issue injunctions.
Specifically, it prohibits a district court from issuing an injunction unless the injunction applies only to the parties of the particular case before the court.
Read the Full Bill
Current Status of Bill HR 1526
Bill HR 1526 is currently in the status of Introduced to Senate since April 10, 2025. Bill HR 1526 was introduced during Congress 119 and was introduced to the House on February 24, 2025. Bill HR 1526's most recent activity was Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. as of April 10, 2025
Bipartisan Support of Bill HR 1526
Total Number of Sponsors
23Democrat Sponsors
0Republican Sponsors
23Unaffiliated Sponsors
0Total Number of Cosponsors
35Democrat Cosponsors
0Republican Cosponsors
35Unaffiliated Cosponsors
0Policy Area and Potential Impact of Bill HR 1526
Primary Policy Focus
LawAlternate Title(s) of Bill HR 1526
To amend title 28, United States Code, to limit the authority of district courts to provide injunctive relief, and for other purposes.
To amend title 28, United States Code, to limit the authority of district courts to provide injunctive relief, and for other purposes.
Comments

Mac Bruce
1,052
1 year ago
This bill is so dumb, it's gonna mess everything up for us regular folks. Who even comes up with this stuff? It's gonna hurt a lot of people, including me.

Lorelai Zhu
977
1 year ago
This bill is bad. It will hurt us.

Ander Glass
1,004
1 year ago
I don't really care about this bill, but if it helps me out, then I guess it's fine.

Brielle O'Donnell
953
1 year ago
What does this bill mean for me and my family in Kansas?
Sponsors and Cosponsors of HR 1526
Latest Bills
USMMA Athletics Act of 2026
Bill S 3266August 13, 2026
Space Commerce Advisory Committee Act
Bill S 434August 13, 2026
Diversity Jurisdiction Inflation Adjustment Act
Bill S 4850August 13, 2026
Officer John Barnes and Chief Michael Ansbro Public Safety Officers' Benefit Program Expansion Act of 2026
Bill S 3897August 13, 2026
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2027
Bill S 4784August 13, 2026
Cahokia Mounds Mississippian Culture Study Act
Bill S 1516August 13, 2026
A bill to require the United States Postal Service to designate ZIP Codes for certain communities.
Bill S 4505August 13, 2026
A bill to designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 86-014 Farrington Highway in Waianae, Hawaii, as the "United States Representative Colleen Hanabusa Post Office Building".
Bill S 4830August 13, 2026
Continuing Appropriations and Extensions Act, 2027
Bill HR 6500August 13, 2026
A bill to designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 201 East Grant Avenue in Georgetown, Ohio, as the "Ulysses S. Grant Post Office Building".
Bill S 4745August 13, 2026
Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 18) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Institutions''; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 28) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to ''Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications''; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1526) to amend title 28, United States Code, to limit the authority of district courts to provide injunctive relief, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 22) to amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to require proof of United States citizenship to register an individual to vote in elections for Federal office, and for other purposes; and for other purposes.
Bill HRES 282April 9, 2025
Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 18) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Institutions"; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 28) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications"; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1526) to amend title 28, United States Code, to limit the authority of district courts to provide injunctive relief, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 22) to amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to require proof of United States citizenship to register an individual to vote in elections for Federal office, and for other purposes; and for other purposes.
Bill HRES 294April 10, 2025





