0
Regulatory Accountability Act
12/15/2023, 3:53 PM
Summary of Bill HR 442
One of the key provisions of the Regulatory Accountability Act is the requirement for federal agencies to conduct cost-benefit analyses of proposed regulations. This would ensure that regulations are based on sound economic principles and that the benefits of the regulations outweigh the costs.
The bill also includes provisions to increase public participation in the rulemaking process. It requires agencies to provide opportunities for public comment on proposed regulations and to consider the input of affected stakeholders before finalizing a rule. Additionally, the Regulatory Accountability Act aims to streamline the regulatory process by requiring agencies to choose the least costly regulatory option that achieves the regulatory objectives. This would help to reduce the burden of unnecessary regulations on businesses and individuals. Overall, the Regulatory Accountability Act is intended to improve the regulatory process in the federal government by increasing transparency, accountability, and public participation. Supporters of the bill argue that it will lead to more effective and efficient regulations, while critics raise concerns about potential delays in the rulemaking process and the potential for industry influence on regulatory decisions.
Congressional Summary of HR 442
Regulatory Accountability Act
This bill expands and provides statutory authority for notice-and-comment rulemaking procedures to require federal agencies to consider (1) whether a rulemaking is required by statute or is within the discretion of the agency, (2) whether existing laws or rules could be amended or rescinded to address the problem, and (3) reasonable alternatives to a new rule.
For proposed major or high-impact rules that have a specified significant economic impact or adverse effect on the public health or safety, an agency must
- publish notice of such rulemaking to invite interested parties to propose alternatives and ideas to accomplish the agency's objectives;
- allow persons interested in high-impact or certain major rules to petition for a public hearing with oral presentation, cross-examination, and the burden of proof on the proponent of the rule;
- adopt the rule that maximizes net benefits within the scope of the statutory provision authorizing the rule, unless the agency explains the costs and benefits that justify adopting an alternative rule and such rule is approved by the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA); and
- publish a framework and metrics for measuring the ongoing effectiveness of the rule.
Agencies must notify OIRA with certain information about a proposed rulemaking, including specified discussion and preliminary explanations concerning a major or high-impact rule. Further, OIRA must establish certain rulemaking guidelines.
Additionally, the bill (1) revises the scope of judicial review of agency actions, and (2) establishes requirements for agencies issuing guidance.
