0
0
0
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Federal Communications Commission relating to "Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet; Restoring Internet Freedom".
6/13/2024, 8:05 AM
Summary of Bill HJRES 153
Bill 118 hjres 153, also known as the "Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Federal Communications Commission relating to 'Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet; Restoring Internet Freedom'", is a piece of legislation that aims to overturn a rule put forth by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) regarding the regulation of the internet.
The rule in question, titled "Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet; Restoring Internet Freedom", was implemented by the FCC in 2017 under the leadership of then-Chairman Ajit Pai. This rule aimed to repeal the Obama-era regulations known as net neutrality, which required internet service providers to treat all internet traffic equally and prohibited them from blocking or slowing down access to certain websites or services.
Supporters of the FCC's rule argue that it promotes competition and innovation in the internet industry by removing government regulations. They believe that repealing net neutrality rules will lead to increased investment in broadband infrastructure and ultimately benefit consumers. On the other hand, opponents of the rule, including many consumer advocacy groups and tech companies, argue that repealing net neutrality protections will allow internet service providers to prioritize certain content over others, potentially leading to a less open and fair internet. They believe that without net neutrality rules, ISPs could potentially throttle internet speeds, block access to certain websites, or create "fast lanes" for companies willing to pay for preferential treatment. Bill 118 hjres 153 seeks to overturn the FCC's rule and reinstate the net neutrality regulations that were in place prior to its implementation. If passed, this legislation would prevent the FCC from enforcing the rule and would require the agency to maintain the previous net neutrality protections. Overall, the passage of Bill 118 hjres 153 would have significant implications for the future of internet regulation in the United States, with proponents and opponents of the FCC's rule both advocating for their respective positions on the issue.
The rule in question, titled "Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet; Restoring Internet Freedom", was implemented by the FCC in 2017 under the leadership of then-Chairman Ajit Pai. This rule aimed to repeal the Obama-era regulations known as net neutrality, which required internet service providers to treat all internet traffic equally and prohibited them from blocking or slowing down access to certain websites or services.
Supporters of the FCC's rule argue that it promotes competition and innovation in the internet industry by removing government regulations. They believe that repealing net neutrality rules will lead to increased investment in broadband infrastructure and ultimately benefit consumers. On the other hand, opponents of the rule, including many consumer advocacy groups and tech companies, argue that repealing net neutrality protections will allow internet service providers to prioritize certain content over others, potentially leading to a less open and fair internet. They believe that without net neutrality rules, ISPs could potentially throttle internet speeds, block access to certain websites, or create "fast lanes" for companies willing to pay for preferential treatment. Bill 118 hjres 153 seeks to overturn the FCC's rule and reinstate the net neutrality regulations that were in place prior to its implementation. If passed, this legislation would prevent the FCC from enforcing the rule and would require the agency to maintain the previous net neutrality protections. Overall, the passage of Bill 118 hjres 153 would have significant implications for the future of internet regulation in the United States, with proponents and opponents of the FCC's rule both advocating for their respective positions on the issue.
Congressional Summary of HJRES 153
This joint resolution nullifies the final rule issued by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) titled Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet; Restoring Internet Freedom and published on May 22, 2024. The rule classifies broadband internet as a telecommunications service for purposes of FCC regulation and prohibits broadband providers from blocking or slowing traffic to lawful content and from engaging in paid prioritization arrangements. (These provisions are commonly referred to as net neutrality rules.)
Read the Full Bill
Current Status of Bill HJRES 153
Bill HJRES 153 is currently in the status of Bill Introduced since May 23, 2024. Bill HJRES 153 was introduced during Congress 118 and was introduced to the House on May 23, 2024. Bill HJRES 153's most recent activity was Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce. as of May 23, 2024
Bipartisan Support of Bill HJRES 153
Total Number of Sponsors
1Democrat Sponsors
0Republican Sponsors
1Unaffiliated Sponsors
0Total Number of Cosponsors
16Democrat Cosponsors
0Republican Cosponsors
16Unaffiliated Cosponsors
0Policy Area and Potential Impact of Bill HJRES 153
Primary Policy Focus
Alternate Title(s) of Bill HJRES 153
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Federal Communications Commission relating to "Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet; Restoring Internet Freedom".
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Federal Communications Commission relating to "Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet; Restoring Internet Freedom".
Comments
Sponsors and Cosponsors of HJRES 153
Latest Bills
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to the withdrawal of the rule relating to "Consumer Financial Protection Circular 2024-03: Unlawful and Unenforceable Contract Terms and Conditions".
Bill SJRES 128March 23, 2026
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to the withdrawal of the rule relating to "Debt Collection Practices (Regulation F); Pay-to-Pay Fees".
Bill SJRES 125March 23, 2026
Smarter Pretrial Detention for Drug Charges Act of 2026
Bill S 3960March 23, 2026
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to the withdrawal of the rule relating to "Fair Credit Reporting; File Disclosure".
Bill SJRES 127March 23, 2026
Secure Tracks Act
Bill S 3987March 23, 2026
Rural Emergency Response Support Act
Bill HR 7739March 23, 2026
LOCATE Act
Bill S 3995March 23, 2026
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to the withdrawal of the rule relating to "The Fair Credit Reporting Act's Limited Preemption of State Laws".
Bill SJRES 129March 23, 2026
DHS Hiring Review Act
Bill S 3996March 23, 2026
Housing for America’s Middle Class Act of 2026
Bill S 3968March 23, 2026
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Federal Communications Commission relating to "Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet; Restoring Internet Freedom".
Bill SJRES 103August 7, 2024





