1
1
1
Gray Wolf State Management Act of 2017
4/7/2025, 3:42 PM
Summary of Bill HR 424
Bill 115 hr 424, also known as the Gray Wolf State Management Act of 2017, is a piece of legislation that focuses on the management of gray wolf populations in the United States. The bill was introduced in the House of Representatives in January 2017.
The main purpose of the bill is to remove the gray wolf from the list of endangered and threatened species under the Endangered Species Act. This would effectively transfer management of the gray wolf population from the federal government to individual states. The bill aims to give states more control over the management of gray wolf populations within their borders.
Proponents of the bill argue that state management of gray wolves would allow for more tailored and effective conservation efforts. They believe that states are better equipped to address the specific needs and concerns of their local communities when it comes to managing gray wolf populations. Opponents of the bill, however, are concerned that removing federal protections for gray wolves could lead to increased hunting and trapping of the species, potentially endangering their populations. They argue that federal oversight is necessary to ensure the long-term survival of gray wolves in the United States. Overall, the Gray Wolf State Management Act of 2017 is a controversial piece of legislation that raises important questions about the balance between state and federal authority in wildlife conservation. The bill is currently under consideration in the House of Representatives, where it has sparked heated debate among lawmakers and conservationists alike.
The main purpose of the bill is to remove the gray wolf from the list of endangered and threatened species under the Endangered Species Act. This would effectively transfer management of the gray wolf population from the federal government to individual states. The bill aims to give states more control over the management of gray wolf populations within their borders.
Proponents of the bill argue that state management of gray wolves would allow for more tailored and effective conservation efforts. They believe that states are better equipped to address the specific needs and concerns of their local communities when it comes to managing gray wolf populations. Opponents of the bill, however, are concerned that removing federal protections for gray wolves could lead to increased hunting and trapping of the species, potentially endangering their populations. They argue that federal oversight is necessary to ensure the long-term survival of gray wolves in the United States. Overall, the Gray Wolf State Management Act of 2017 is a controversial piece of legislation that raises important questions about the balance between state and federal authority in wildlife conservation. The bill is currently under consideration in the House of Representatives, where it has sparked heated debate among lawmakers and conservationists alike.
Current Status of Bill HR 424
Bill HR 424 is currently in the status of Bill Introduced since January 10, 2017. Bill HR 424 was introduced during Congress 115 and was introduced to the House on January 10, 2017. Bill HR 424's most recent activity was Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 361. as of January 8, 2018
Bipartisan Support of Bill HR 424
Total Number of Sponsors
1Democrat Sponsors
1Republican Sponsors
0Unaffiliated Sponsors
0Total Number of Cosponsors
0Democrat Cosponsors
0Republican Cosponsors
0Unaffiliated Cosponsors
0Policy Area and Potential Impact of Bill HR 424
Primary Policy Focus
AnimalsComments
Sponsors and Cosponsors of HR 424
Latest Bills
TRAPS Act
Bill HR 4936September 18, 2026
Apples to Apples Comparison Act of 2025
Bill HR 4093September 18, 2026
American Lending Fairness Act of 2026
Bill HR 7866September 18, 2026
Civil Investigative Demand Reform Act of 2025
Bill HR 1653September 18, 2026
American Reserve Modernization Act of 2026
Bill HR 8957September 18, 2026
Preventive Health Savings Act
Bill HR 4464September 18, 2026
PEARL Act
Bill HR 9327September 18, 2026
Medically Tailored Home-Delivered Meals Program Pilot Act
Bill HR 5439September 18, 2026
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 117 West Lovett Street in Charlotte, Michigan, as the "Francis C. Flaherty Post Office Building".
Bill HR 9570September 18, 2026
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1019 Avenue H in Fort Madison, Iowa, as the "Martin L. Graber Post Office".
Bill HR 4707September 18, 2026




