0
0
0
To amend the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 to ensure that retirement investors receive advice in their best interests, and for other purposes.
4/7/2025, 3:41 PM
Summary of Bill HR 4293
Bill 114 hr 4293, also known as the "Fiduciary Duty Clarification Act," aims to amend the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) to ensure that retirement investors receive advice that is in their best interests. The bill seeks to clarify and strengthen the fiduciary duty that financial advisors owe to their clients when providing retirement investment advice.
Under the current law, financial advisors are required to act in the best interests of their clients when providing retirement investment advice. However, there has been some confusion and ambiguity surrounding this requirement, leading to potential conflicts of interest and harm to investors.
The Fiduciary Duty Clarification Act seeks to address these issues by explicitly stating that financial advisors must act solely in the best interests of their clients when providing retirement investment advice. This means that advisors must prioritize the interests of their clients above their own financial gain or other considerations. Additionally, the bill includes provisions to enhance transparency and accountability in the financial advisory industry. It requires advisors to disclose any potential conflicts of interest and to provide clear and understandable information about the fees and costs associated with their services. Overall, the goal of Bill 114 hr 4293 is to protect retirement investors and ensure that they receive advice that is in their best interests. By clarifying and strengthening the fiduciary duty of financial advisors, the bill aims to promote trust and confidence in the retirement investment industry.
Under the current law, financial advisors are required to act in the best interests of their clients when providing retirement investment advice. However, there has been some confusion and ambiguity surrounding this requirement, leading to potential conflicts of interest and harm to investors.
The Fiduciary Duty Clarification Act seeks to address these issues by explicitly stating that financial advisors must act solely in the best interests of their clients when providing retirement investment advice. This means that advisors must prioritize the interests of their clients above their own financial gain or other considerations. Additionally, the bill includes provisions to enhance transparency and accountability in the financial advisory industry. It requires advisors to disclose any potential conflicts of interest and to provide clear and understandable information about the fees and costs associated with their services. Overall, the goal of Bill 114 hr 4293 is to protect retirement investors and ensure that they receive advice that is in their best interests. By clarifying and strengthening the fiduciary duty of financial advisors, the bill aims to promote trust and confidence in the retirement investment industry.
Current Status of Bill HR 4293
Bill HR 4293 is currently in the status of Bill Introduced since December 18, 2015. Bill HR 4293 was introduced during Congress 114 and was introduced to the House on December 18, 2015.  Bill HR 4293's most recent activity was Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 391. as of April 20, 2016
Bipartisan Support of Bill HR 4293
Total Number of Sponsors
1Democrat Sponsors
0Republican Sponsors
1Unaffiliated Sponsors
0Total Number of Cosponsors
0Democrat Cosponsors
0Republican Cosponsors
0Unaffiliated Cosponsors
0Policy Area and Potential Impact of Bill HR 4293
Primary Policy Focus
Labor and EmploymentComments
Sponsors and Cosponsors of HR 4293
Latest Bills
Reliable Federal Infrastructure Act
Bill HR 4690April 28, 2026
FIRE Act
Bill HR 6387April 28, 2026
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to the withdrawal of the rule relating to "The Fair Credit Reporting Act's Limited Preemption of State Laws".
Bill SJRES 129April 28, 2026
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to the withdrawal of the rule relating to "Debt Collection Practices (Regulation F); Pay-to-Pay Fees".
Bill SJRES 125April 28, 2026
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to the withdrawal of the rule relating to "Fair Credit Reporting; File Disclosure".
Bill SJRES 127April 28, 2026
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to the withdrawal of the rule relating to "Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (Regulation F); Time-Barred Debt".
Bill SJRES 126April 28, 2026
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to the withdrawal of the rule relating to "Fair Credit Reporting; Background Screening".
Bill SJRES 133April 28, 2026
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to the withdrawal of the rule relating to "Consumer Financial Protection Circular 2024-03: Unlawful and Unenforceable Contract Terms and Conditions".
Bill SJRES 128April 28, 2026
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to withdrawal of the rule relating to "Consumer Financial Protection Circular 2024-05: Improper Overdraft Opt-In Practices".
Bill SJRES 130April 28, 2026
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to the withdrawal of the rule relating to "Consumer Financial Protection Circular 2024-02: Deceptive Marketing Practices About the Speed or Cost of Sending a Remittance Transfer".
Bill SJRES 131April 28, 2026





