0
0
0
Shasta-Trinity National Forest Administrative Jurisdiction Transfer Act
4/7/2025, 3:35 PM
Summary of Bill HR 689
Bill 111 hr 689, also known as the Shasta-Trinity National Forest Administrative Jurisdiction Transfer Act, is a piece of legislation that aims to transfer administrative jurisdiction over certain federal lands from the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) to the Forest Service within the Shasta-Trinity National Forest in California.
The bill specifically focuses on transferring approximately 30,000 acres of land from the BLM to the Forest Service in order to improve management and oversight of these lands. This transfer of jurisdiction is intended to streamline decision-making processes and ensure that the lands are managed in a more efficient and effective manner.
Proponents of the bill argue that transferring administrative jurisdiction to the Forest Service will allow for better coordination and collaboration between federal agencies, leading to improved conservation efforts and increased recreational opportunities for the public. Additionally, supporters believe that the transfer will help to address issues related to wildfire management and forest health within the Shasta-Trinity National Forest. Opponents of the bill have raised concerns about potential impacts on local communities and stakeholders, as well as the potential for increased restrictions on access to the lands in question. However, proponents argue that the transfer of administrative jurisdiction will ultimately benefit both the environment and the public by improving management practices and ensuring the long-term sustainability of the lands. Overall, the Shasta-Trinity National Forest Administrative Jurisdiction Transfer Act seeks to transfer administrative jurisdiction over federal lands in California in order to improve management practices and enhance conservation efforts within the Shasta-Trinity National Forest.
The bill specifically focuses on transferring approximately 30,000 acres of land from the BLM to the Forest Service in order to improve management and oversight of these lands. This transfer of jurisdiction is intended to streamline decision-making processes and ensure that the lands are managed in a more efficient and effective manner.
Proponents of the bill argue that transferring administrative jurisdiction to the Forest Service will allow for better coordination and collaboration between federal agencies, leading to improved conservation efforts and increased recreational opportunities for the public. Additionally, supporters believe that the transfer will help to address issues related to wildfire management and forest health within the Shasta-Trinity National Forest. Opponents of the bill have raised concerns about potential impacts on local communities and stakeholders, as well as the potential for increased restrictions on access to the lands in question. However, proponents argue that the transfer of administrative jurisdiction will ultimately benefit both the environment and the public by improving management practices and ensuring the long-term sustainability of the lands. Overall, the Shasta-Trinity National Forest Administrative Jurisdiction Transfer Act seeks to transfer administrative jurisdiction over federal lands in California in order to improve management practices and enhance conservation efforts within the Shasta-Trinity National Forest.
Current Status of Bill HR 689
Bill HR 689 is currently in the status of Bill Introduced since January 26, 2009. Bill HR 689 was introduced during Congress 111 and was introduced to the House on January 26, 2009. Bill HR 689's most recent activity was Became Public Law No: 111-206. as of July 27, 2010
Bipartisan Support of Bill HR 689
Total Number of Sponsors
1Democrat Sponsors
0Republican Sponsors
1Unaffiliated Sponsors
0Total Number of Cosponsors
0Democrat Cosponsors
0Republican Cosponsors
0Unaffiliated Cosponsors
0Policy Area and Potential Impact of Bill HR 689
Primary Policy Focus
Public Lands and Natural ResourcesComments
Sponsors and Cosponsors of HR 689
Latest Bills
TRAPS Act
Bill HR 4936September 18, 2026
Apples to Apples Comparison Act of 2025
Bill HR 4093September 18, 2026
American Lending Fairness Act of 2026
Bill HR 7866September 18, 2026
Civil Investigative Demand Reform Act of 2025
Bill HR 1653September 18, 2026
American Reserve Modernization Act of 2026
Bill HR 8957September 18, 2026
Preventive Health Savings Act
Bill HR 4464September 18, 2026
PEARL Act
Bill HR 9327September 18, 2026
Medically Tailored Home-Delivered Meals Program Pilot Act
Bill HR 5439September 18, 2026
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 117 West Lovett Street in Charlotte, Michigan, as the "Francis C. Flaherty Post Office Building".
Bill HR 9570September 18, 2026
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1019 Avenue H in Fort Madison, Iowa, as the "Martin L. Graber Post Office".
Bill HR 4707September 18, 2026
