Department of Justice Awarded a Contract to DIEBOLD NIXDORF, INC for $0.00

Summary of Award

The JSON response provided from usaspending.gov offers a comprehensive view of a federal contract awarded to Diebold Nixdorf, Inc by the U.S. Department of Justice's U.S. Marshals Service. This report aims to give an extensive summary of the key elements of the award, its transactions, and details regarding the recipient and their services.

### Award Details

The contract in question is a delivery order, as indicated by the type description, with the specific work described as "HIDS INSTALL." While the total obligation for the contract stands at zero, the total account obligation is listed as $1,280.69. The delivery order—referred to with the unique award ID "15M20020FA32H0150"—was officially signed on September 2, 2020, indicating the agreement's starting point and administrative completion. The primary focus within the contract is the installation of security systems, particularly alarms, signals, and security detection systems. The Purchase and Installation of Equipment related to security systems aligns with the product or service code "N063" and NAICS code "561621," which identifies Security Systems Services, excluding locksmiths. ### Government Agency Involvement The contract was both awarded and funded by the U.S. Department of Justice, specifically under the U.S. Marshals Service's umbrella. The contract reflects an extensive interagency collaboration commonly seen in federal contracts intended to enhance public facilities or services, with a noted involvement of the U.S. Marshals Service through the "Judicial Security Division." ### Recipient Information The award recipient is Diebold Nixdorf, Inc, a well-established entity based in North Canton, Ohio. With its known federal identifier "WWCQMENK7JW1," Diebold Nixdorf specializes in manufacturing goods and security systems. Classified as a U.S. Owned Business, it's not designated a small business. Diebold Nixdorf stands out for its robust expertise in security services, a crucial element that aligns them with the contract's requirements. The firm's location underscores its American roots. Situated in Ohio's Summit County, Diebold Nixdorf operates from a base at 5995 Mayfair Rd, providing it with strategic proximity to numerous regulatory and governmental agencies. Consequently, the business operates primarily within the category of corporate manufacturing and is well-equipped to deliver the necessary security solutions mandated by federal proposals. ### Transaction Specifics The contract's financial movements are characterized by two key transactions: 1. An initial transaction occurred on September 2, 2020, with a credit amount of $1,280.69. This coincides with the date the contract was signed and suggests an initial payment or credit adjustment at the contract's commencement. 2. The second transaction, dated April 10, 2025, shows a debit of $1,280.69, likely an accounting adjustment or a grounding check to close the financial loop of the contract. The presence of DEF code "Q" throughout both transactions may point to a specific budgetary or departmental finance code within governmental accounting practices. Both transactions reference the same award ID and recipient, with the latter showing a modification number "P00001," perhaps indicative of an administrative change or post-completion audit. ### Contract Specifications and Performance The agreement itself has a performance period from September 3, 2020, to March 3, 2021, leaving an echo of date management leading to its last modification noted on April 10, 2025. The fixed performance period suggests that the work was distinctly time-constrained, typical of projects involving physical installations. ### Competitive Context and Pricing Across the contractual details, the awarding process involved "Full and Open Competition," a prerequisite for many federal contracts that emphasizes transparency and equal opportunity. Furthermore, the contract pricing was categorized as "Firm Fixed Price," assuring that the financial parameters were locked, minimizing cost variance risks for the government. This firm pricing strategy, coupled with being a U.S.-owned business with no foreign funding implications, aligns Diebold Nixdorf's role within domestic commercial item acquisition, evoking federal priorities for secure and self-reliant project completions. ### Conclusion In summary, this award to Diebold Nixdorf, Inc is a testament to the company's established reputation in security systems services augmented by federal engagements. It reflects the government's commitment to improving judicial security infrastructure through strategic partnerships with experienced entities. Though the financial figures involved are modest, the contract follows strict government protocols from competitive tendering to performance tracking, ensuring that all federal contract objectives are met with professionalism and integrity.