Federal Trade Commission Awarded a Contract to DAVID CHOFFNES for $0.00

Summary of Award

In examining the details of the awarded contract between the US federal government and the contract recipient David Choffnes, as presented in the JSON data from usaspending.gov, we gain a comprehensive view of government spending and procurement processes, particularly in relation to expert services in management consulting. This contract, identified by the unique award ID "CONT_AWD_29FTC124C0056_2900_-NONE-_-NONE-", is a definitive contract awarded by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

**Overview of the Contract:**

The contract was signed on August 9, 2024, with a period of performance lasting from August 8, 2024, to April 9, 2025. Described as "Expert Services," it falls under the professional service category, specifically coded as R424, which corresponds to support for professional services like expert witness provision. This aligns with the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 541611, indicating engagement in administrative management and general management consulting services. From the perspective of total financial obligation, the contract involves a total account obligation of $24,000. Notably, there is no subaward amount, meaning there are no secondary recipients of the funding. This single-point focus reflects the contract’s targeted nature, likely addressing specific needs within the FTC’s operational framework. **Recipient Details:** David Choffnes, the recipient, is based in Needham Heights, Massachusetts. The business is categorized as a "U.S.-Owned Business," operating as a "Sole Proprietorship" and not designated a small business. This categorization points to an individual or family-run business not primarily defined by scale but perhaps the specialized expertise offered. The location data suggests a strong local connection in Norfolk County, Massachusetts. **Nature and Execution of the Contract:** The contract was categorized as a "Definitive Contract," indicating a clear, specific agreement often used for procurements involving unique needs and specialized services. This aligns with the description of "Expert Services," denoting the requirement for a high level of professional insight, possibly for consulting or advisory on complex matters related to FTC mandates. Solicitation procedures are marked as "SSS" (Sole Source Selection), meaning this contract was awarded without full and open competition. The extent competed is described as "Not Competed," under the "Mobilization, Essential R&D (FAR 6.302-3)" justification. This highlights a situation where the FTC determined that the services of David Choffnes are uniquely qualified and urgently required, facilitating a direct award. Additionally, there was only one offer received for this contract. The type of contract pricing is noted as "Time and Materials," allowing cost reimbursement based on the time spent by the contractor and the materials used, subject to a ceiling price. This framework is particularly beneficial in handling projects with higher uncertainties or variable requirements, ensuring flexibility in execution. **Contract Implementation and Regulatory Compliance:** No commercial test program was utilized, indicating a standard government acquisition. The absence of a subcontracting plan reiterates the direct and singular nature of this collaboration. Notably, labor standards and construction wage rates are marked as not applicable, which is consistent with the nature of services being professional rather than industrial or physical. Further regulatory descriptors such as Clinger-Cohen Act planning, domestic vs. foreign entity, and interagency contracting authority mark this as a strictly domestic engagement focused on specialized government support rather than international procurement or broader interagency reliance. **Agency Context:** The awarding and funding agency is the Federal Trade Commission, which seeks to prevent anticompetitive, deceptive, and unfair business practices. Engaging in expert services supports this mission, potentially helping in litigation support, market analysis, or policy advisory roles. The "Office of Acquisition" within the FTC is the primary administrative unit responsible, highlighting structured processes guiding this professional engagement. **Conclusion:** The awarded contract to David Choffnes underscores a strategic decision by the FTC to leverage individual expertise for essential, possibly complex operational tasks. The direct award process, coupled with the professional categorization, emphasizes trust and necessity in procuring specialized services indispensable for organizational missions. With a clear financial obligation and detailed business alignment, this contract exemplifies collaborative efforts to bolster government operations through targeted spending and expert engagement.