0
General Services Administration Awarded a Contract to MAXIMUM TECHNOLOGY CORP for $475,000.00
Signed on
6/4/2020, 12:00 AM
MAXIMUM TECHNOLOGY CORP Government Contract #47QTCA20D00AU
MAXIMUM TECHNOLOGY CORP was awarded a contract with the United States Government for $475,000.00. The contract was awarded by the agency office GSA/FAS CENTER FOR IT SCHEDULE PROG, which is a division with the Federal Acquisition Service within the General Services Administration.
Summary of Award
**Award Overview**
The contract examined is a Federal Supply Schedule (FSS) contract, uniquely identified by "CONT_IDV_47QTCA20D00AU_4732" with a PIID of "47QTCA20D00AU." This is an Indefinite Delivery Vehicle (IDV) contract, specifically categorized as an FSS contract, targeting the execution of a Federal Supply Schedule. Signed on June 4, 2020, this contract is set to operate over a five-year period, ending on June 3, 2025, involving a potential total value of $475,000. A key point of interest is that there are currently no obligations or subaward amounts attached, indicating careful allocation or anticipated distribution of funds.
**Nature of Services**
The core services under this contract fall under the Product or Service Code (PSC), "D399," specifically focusing on "IT AND TELECOM - OTHER IT AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS". Further categorization under the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) highlights a focus on "Custom Computer Programming Services" (code 541511), suggesting that the contract is primarily focused on providing specialized IT services and telecom solutions, encompassing a wide spectrum of IT-related programming services tailored for government use.
**Competitive Framework**
The procurement process was administered using a negotiated proposal or quote system, affirming a competitive stance with "Full and Open Competition." This demonstrates an inclusive approach to accepting proposals from diverse providers, with 999 offers received, an indication of robust participation from potential contractors. Crucially, there was no preference or set-aside for small businesses, removing specific incentives for such entities and levelling the competitive playing field across different business sizes.
**Recipient Details**
The recipient of this contract, Maximum Technology Corp, is a U.S.-owned entity based in Huntsville, Alabama. The company operates from the heart of Madison County, an area renowned for its tech-centric economy. Maximum Technology Corp is a small business categorized under multiple ownership echelons like "Black American Owned Business," "Minority Owned Business," "HUBZone Firm," and not tax-exempt, depicting a versatile and inclusive operational foundation. The prominence of these categorizations underscores the company’s alignment to government preferences for supporting diversified business participation in federal contracts.
**Operational and Financial Mechanics**
While the award itself indicates a broad financial ceiling of $475,000, reflected within the "base_and_all_options" potential ceiling, the actual obligation remains at zero, highlighting an anticipatory phase rather than active financial engagement. This zero-obligation state signals a preparatory stage, possibly awaiting trigger mechanisms for fund deployment or service initiation aligned with governmental needs.
**Contractual Conditions**
Analyzing the transaction modalities, we observe fixed pricing mechanisms with built-in economic adjustments, a flexible approach to handling potential market fluctuations or economic volatilities over its five-year horizon. This is crucial for sustained fiscal health amidst changing economic landscapes, particularly within dynamic industries such as IT and telecommunications.
**Transactions and Modifications**
Multiple transactions reflect various stages of the contract's life. Modifications, frequent and varied, are seen through identifiers like "PSA893" or "PA0018," representing administrative or logistical adjustments without significant fund movement. Each modification retains a transaction amount of zero, indicating non-monetary updates - likely administrative fine-tuning or adjustments to terms, schedules, or deliverables without altering financial standings.
**Agency Role and Execution**
Both funding and awarding responsibilities lie with the General Services Administration (GSA), specifically through its Federal Acquisition Service (FAS) division. This streamlined agency involvement centralizes oversight and custodianship across the award lifecycle, ensuring a unified approach to administration, governance, and performance evaluation of the services rendered by Maximum Technology Corp.
In conclusion, this contract represents a strategic investment into custom IT and telecommunications services by the federal government. While the financial mechanics remain in a nascent execution phase, the recipient’s robust business framework and varied ownership constructs highlight a committed alignment with fostering diverse, sophisticated service solutions for governmental operations. The transaction patterns, administrative modifications, and competitive landscape underscore an evolving dynamic that is set to cater comprehensively to federal IT demands.
Contract Details
Agency Details
Recipient Details
Comments
Award Transactions
Federal Acquisition Service, a sub agency of General Services Administration, issued a payment of $0.00 to MAXIMUM TECHNOLOGY CORP. The payment included a Subsidy Cost of $0.00.
This payment could indicate a change to the existing contract.
Federal Acquisition Service, a sub agency of General Services Administration, issued a payment of $0.00 to MAXIMUM TECHNOLOGY CORP. The payment included a Subsidy Cost of $0.00.
This payment could indicate a change to the existing contract.
Federal Acquisition Service, a sub agency of General Services Administration, issued a payment of $0.00 to MAXIMUM TECHNOLOGY CORP. The payment included a Subsidy Cost of $0.00.
This payment could indicate a change to the existing contract.
Federal Acquisition Service, a sub agency of General Services Administration, issued a payment of $0.00 to MAXIMUM TECHNOLOGY CORP. The payment included a Subsidy Cost of $0.00.
This payment could indicate a change to the existing contract.
Federal Acquisition Service, a sub agency of General Services Administration, issued a payment of $0.00 to MAXIMUM TECHNOLOGY CORP. The payment included a Subsidy Cost of $0.00.
This payment could indicate a change to the existing contract.
Federal Acquisition Service, a sub agency of General Services Administration, issued a payment of $0.00 to MAXIMUM TECHNOLOGY CORP. The payment included a Subsidy Cost of $0.00.
This payment could indicate a change to the existing contract.
Federal Acquisition Service, a sub agency of General Services Administration, issued a payment of $0.00 to MAXIMUM TECHNOLOGY CORP. The payment included a Subsidy Cost of $0.00.
This payment could indicate a change to the existing contract.
Federal Acquisition Service, a sub agency of General Services Administration, issued a payment of $0.00 to MAXIMUM TECHNOLOGY CORP. The payment included a Subsidy Cost of $0.00.
This payment could indicate a change to the existing contract.
Federal Acquisition Service, a sub agency of General Services Administration, issued a payment of $0.00 to MAXIMUM TECHNOLOGY CORP. The payment included a Subsidy Cost of $0.00.
This payment could indicate a change to the existing contract.
Federal Acquisition Service, a sub agency of General Services Administration, issued a payment of $0.00 to MAXIMUM TECHNOLOGY CORP. The payment included a Subsidy Cost of $0.00.
This payment could indicate a change to the existing contract.
Federal Acquisition Service, a sub agency of General Services Administration, issued a payment of $0.00 to MAXIMUM TECHNOLOGY CORP. The payment included a Subsidy Cost of $0.00.
This payment could indicate a change to the existing contract.
Federal Acquisition Service, a sub agency of General Services Administration, issued a payment of $0.00 to MAXIMUM TECHNOLOGY CORP. The payment included a Subsidy Cost of $0.00.
This payment could indicate a change to the existing contract.
Federal Acquisition Service, a sub agency of General Services Administration, issued a payment of $0.00 to MAXIMUM TECHNOLOGY CORP. The payment included a Subsidy Cost of $0.00.
This payment could indicate a change to the existing contract.
Federal Acquisition Service, a sub agency of General Services Administration, issued a payment of $0.00 to MAXIMUM TECHNOLOGY CORP. The payment included a Subsidy Cost of $0.00.
This payment could indicate a change to the existing contract.
Federal Acquisition Service, a sub agency of General Services Administration, issued a payment of $0.00 to MAXIMUM TECHNOLOGY CORP. The payment included a Subsidy Cost of $0.00.
This payment could indicate a change to the existing contract.
Federal Acquisition Service, a sub agency of General Services Administration, issued a payment of $0.00 to MAXIMUM TECHNOLOGY CORP. The payment included a Subsidy Cost of $0.00.
This payment could indicate a change to the existing contract.
Federal Acquisition Service, a sub agency of General Services Administration, issued a payment of $0.00 to MAXIMUM TECHNOLOGY CORP. The payment included a Subsidy Cost of $0.00.
This payment could indicate a change to the existing contract.
Federal Acquisition Service, a sub agency of General Services Administration, issued a payment of $0.00 to MAXIMUM TECHNOLOGY CORP. The payment included a Subsidy Cost of $0.00.
This payment could indicate a change to the existing contract.
Federal Acquisition Service, a sub agency of General Services Administration, issued a payment of $0.00 to MAXIMUM TECHNOLOGY CORP. The payment included a Subsidy Cost of $0.00.
This payment could indicate a change to the existing contract.
Federal Acquisition Service, a sub agency of General Services Administration, issued a payment of $0.00 to MAXIMUM TECHNOLOGY CORP. The payment included a Subsidy Cost of $0.00.
This payment could indicate a change to the existing contract.
Federal Acquisition Service, a sub agency of General Services Administration, issued a payment of $0.00 to MAXIMUM TECHNOLOGY CORP. The payment included a Subsidy Cost of $0.00.
This payment could indicate a change to the existing contract.
Federal Acquisition Service, a sub agency of General Services Administration, issued a payment of $0.00 to MAXIMUM TECHNOLOGY CORP. The payment included a Subsidy Cost of $0.00.
This payment could indicate a change to the existing contract.
Federal Acquisition Service, a sub agency of General Services Administration, issued a payment of $0.00 to MAXIMUM TECHNOLOGY CORP. The payment included a Subsidy Cost of $0.00.
This payment could indicate a change to the existing contract.
Federal Acquisition Service, a sub agency of General Services Administration, issued a payment of $0.00 to MAXIMUM TECHNOLOGY CORP. The payment included a Subsidy Cost of $0.00.
This payment could indicate a change to the existing contract.
Federal Acquisition Service, a sub agency of General Services Administration, issued a payment of $0.00 to MAXIMUM TECHNOLOGY CORP. The payment included a Subsidy Cost of $0.00.
This payment could indicate a change to the existing contract.
Federal Acquisition Service, a sub agency of General Services Administration, issued a payment of $0.00 to MAXIMUM TECHNOLOGY CORP. The payment included a Subsidy Cost of $0.00.
This payment could indicate a change to the existing contract.
Federal Acquisition Service, a sub agency of General Services Administration, issued a payment of $0.00 to MAXIMUM TECHNOLOGY CORP. The payment included a Subsidy Cost of $0.00.
This payment could indicate a change to the existing contract.
Federal Acquisition Service, a sub agency of General Services Administration, issued a payment of $0.00 to MAXIMUM TECHNOLOGY CORP. The payment included a Subsidy Cost of $0.00.
This payment could indicate a change to the existing contract.