Zayla George

es on the process of selecting members for a specific committee within the House of Representatives. The bill outlines the procedures and guidelines for electing individuals to serve on this standing committee, ensuring that the selection process is fair and transparent. The bill emphasizes the importance of diversity and representation within the committee, stating that members should be chosen based on their qualifications, expertise, and commitment to serving the best interests of the American people. It also highlights the need for bipartisanship and collaboration among committee members, encouraging cooperation and unity in addressing important issues facing the nation. Overall, Bill 119 HRES 213 aims to streamline the process of selecting members for this standing committee, promoting accountability and effectiveness in the legislative process. By establishing clear guidelines and criteria for electing individuals to serve on the committee, the bill seeks to ensure that the voices of all Americans are heard and represented in the decision-making process within the House of Representatives.

Recent Activity

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Alternative Names

Electing Members to a certain standing committee of the House of Representatives.

Electing Members to a certain standing committee of the House of Representatives.

Associated Legislation

undefined

Policy Areas

Congress

Potential Impact

undefined

Sponsors and Supporters

Rep. Meuser, Daniel [R-PA-9]

Rep. Meuser, Daniel [R-PA-9]

Rep. Meuser, Daniel [R-PA-9]

Rep. Meuser, Daniel [R-PA-9]

Rep. Meuser, Daniel [R-PA-9]

Cosponsors and Supporters

undefined

Committees and Subcommittees

undefined

Variations and Revisions

rs and Consumer Reporting Agencies Concerning Medical Information (Regulation V)", is a piece of legislation that aims to overturn a rule proposed by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection regarding the handling of medical information by creditors and consumer reporting agencies. The rule in question, known as Regulation V, prohibits creditors and consumer reporting agencies from including certain medical information in credit reports. This information includes details about medical debts and payment history, which can have a significant impact on an individual's credit score and financial well-being. Supporters of the bill argue that the inclusion of medical information in credit reports can unfairly penalize individuals who have experienced medical emergencies or unexpected health issues. They believe that this rule is necessary to protect consumers from discrimination based on their medical history. Opponents of the bill, on the other hand, argue that the rule is an overreach of government regulation and could potentially harm the financial industry. They believe that creditors and consumer reporting agencies should have the ability to consider all relevant information when assessing an individual's creditworthiness. Overall, Bill 119 hjres 74 is a contentious piece of legislation that highlights the ongoing debate over the role of government regulation in the financial industry and the protection of consumer rights.

Recent Activity

Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.

Alternative Names

Disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Prohibition on Creditors and Consumer Reporting Agencies Concerning Medical Information (Regulation V)".

Disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Prohibition on Creditors and Consumer Reporting Agencies Concerning Medical Information (Regulation V)".

Associated Legislation

undefined

Policy Areas

undefined

Potential Impact

undefined

Sponsors and Supporters

Rep. Norman, Ralph [R-SC-5]

Cosponsors and Supporters

Rep. Barr, Andy [R-KY-6]

Rep. Donalds, Byron [R-FL-19]

Rep. Ogles, Andrew [R-TN-5]

Rep. Flood, Mike [R-NE-1]

Rep. Fitzgerald, Scott [R-WI-5]

Rep. Wagner, Ann [R-MO-2]

Rep. Lucas, Frank D. [R-OK-3]

Rep. Huizenga, Bill [R-MI-4]

Rep. Loudermilk, Barry [R-GA-11]

Rep. Meuser, Daniel [R-PA-9]

Rep. Williams, Roger [R-TX-25]

Rep. Downing, Troy [R-MT-2]

Rep. Moore, Tim [R-NC-14]

Committees and Subcommittees

Financial Services Committee

Variations and Revisions

undefined

w and policy. The bill seeks to address the ongoing debate and confusion surrounding the division of powers between the federal government and individual states when it comes to immigration. The key provisions of the bill include reaffirming that the federal government has sole authority to regulate immigration, including the admission and removal of foreign nationals. It also clarifies that states cannot enact their own immigration laws that conflict with federal law. Additionally, the bill outlines specific areas where the federal government's jurisdiction over immigration is paramount, such as border security, visa issuance, and enforcement of immigration laws. It also emphasizes the importance of cooperation between federal, state, and local authorities in enforcing immigration laws. Overall, Bill 119 HR 864 seeks to provide clarity and consistency in the enforcement of immigration laws across the United States, ensuring that the federal government maintains its authority in this critical area of policy.

Recent Activity

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Alternative Names

To clarify the Federal Government's jurisdiction over immigration law and policy.

To clarify the Federal Government's jurisdiction over immigration law and policy.

Freedom to Cooperate Act

Freedom to Cooperate Act

To clarify the Federal Government's jurisdiction over immigration law and policy.

Associated Legislation

undefined

Policy Areas

undefined

Potential Impact

undefined

Sponsors and Supporters

Rep. Kiley, Kevin [R-CA-3]

Rep. Kiley, Kevin [R-CA-3]

Cosponsors and Supporters

undefined

Committees and Subcommittees

Judiciary Committee

Variations and Revisions

orney General investigate any reported violations of the partial birth abortion ban. This legislation specifically targets the controversial practice of partial birth abortion, which involves partially delivering a fetus before terminating the pregnancy. The bill seeks to ensure that healthcare providers are complying with the federal ban on partial birth abortion, which was first enacted in 2003. By requiring the Attorney General to investigate alleged violations of this ban, the legislation aims to hold accountable any individuals or facilities that may be performing these procedures illegally. Supporters of the bill argue that enforcing the partial birth abortion ban is crucial to protecting the sanctity of life and upholding the rule of law. They believe that the government has a responsibility to ensure that all healthcare providers are following federal regulations regarding abortion procedures. Opponents of the bill, on the other hand, argue that it infringes on women's reproductive rights and interferes with the doctor-patient relationship. They believe that the government should not be involved in regulating medical procedures and that the decision to terminate a pregnancy should be left to the individual and their healthcare provider. Overall, Bill 119 HR 895 is a contentious piece of legislation that highlights the ongoing debate surrounding abortion rights in the United States. If passed, this bill would increase oversight and enforcement of the partial birth abortion ban, potentially impacting the availability and legality of certain abortion procedures in the country.

Recent Activity

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Alternative Names

To amend title 18, United States Code, to require the Attorney General to investigate alleged violations of the partial birth abortion ban.

To amend title 18, United States Code, to require the Attorney General to investigate alleged violations of the partial birth abortion ban.

Ensuring Justice for Victims of Partial-Birth Abortion Act

Ensuring Justice for Victims of Partial-Birth Abortion Act

To amend title 18, United States Code, to require the Attorney General to investigate alleged violations of the partial birth abortion ban.

Associated Legislation

undefined

Policy Areas

undefined

Potential Impact

undefined

Sponsors and Supporters

Rep. Self, Keith [R-TX-3]

Rep. Self, Keith [R-TX-3]

Cosponsors and Supporters

Rep. Biggs, Andy [R-AZ-5]

Rep. Aderholt, Robert B. [R-AL-4]

Rep. Miller, Mary E. [R-IL-15]

Rep. LaMalfa, Doug [R-CA-1]

Rep. Webster, Daniel [R-FL-11]

Rep. Weber, Randy K. Sr. [R-TX-14]

Rep. Harris, Andy [R-MD-1]

Rep. Moore, Riley [R-WV-2]

Rep. Burlison, Eric [R-MO-7]

Rep. Guest, Michael [R-MS-3]

Rep. Ogles, Andrew [R-TN-5]

Rep. Babin, Brian [R-TX-36]

Rep. Harris, Mark [R-NC-8]

Committees and Subcommittees

Judiciary Committee

Variations and Revisions

round-mounted solar energy systems. The bill was introduced in the House of Representatives and is currently under consideration. The main purpose of the bill is to prioritize the use of USDA funding for other agricultural projects and initiatives, rather than for ground-mounted solar energy systems. The bill argues that ground-mounted solar energy systems can have negative impacts on agricultural land, such as reducing the amount of land available for farming and potentially harming wildlife habitats. If passed, the bill would require the USDA to limit the amount of funding that can be used for ground-mounted solar energy systems and prioritize funding for other agricultural projects. The bill also includes provisions for monitoring and reporting on the use of USDA funding for solar energy systems. Overall, the bill seeks to balance the promotion of renewable energy with the protection of agricultural land and wildlife habitats. Supporters of the bill argue that it is necessary to ensure that USDA funding is used effectively and efficiently, while opponents argue that it could hinder the growth of solar energy in the agricultural sector.

Recent Activity

Referred to the House Committee on Agriculture.

Alternative Names

To limit USDA funding for ground-mounted solar energy systems, and for other purposes.

To limit USDA funding for ground-mounted solar energy systems, and for other purposes.

Associated Legislation

undefined

Policy Areas

undefined

Potential Impact

undefined

Sponsors and Supporters

Rep. Bost, Mike [R-IL-12]

Cosponsors and Supporters

Rep. Scott, Austin [R-GA-8]

Rep. Finstad, Brad [R-MN-1]

Rep. Taylor, David [R-OH-2]

Committees and Subcommittees

Agriculture Committee

Variations and Revisions

undefined