Rayna Link

granting disaster assistance. This bill was introduced in the US Congress to ensure that individuals and communities affected by natural disasters are not denied aid or assistance based on their political beliefs or affiliations. The bill states that no individual or community should be denied disaster assistance solely because of their political affiliation. It emphasizes the importance of providing equal and fair access to disaster relief resources for all individuals, regardless of their political views. If passed, this bill would require federal agencies responsible for distributing disaster assistance to adhere to these non-discrimination guidelines. It would also establish mechanisms for individuals to report instances of discrimination based on political affiliation and seek recourse if they believe they have been unfairly denied assistance. Overall, Bill 119 HR 1342 seeks to uphold the principles of fairness and equality in the distribution of disaster assistance, ensuring that all individuals and communities in need are able to receive the support they require during times of crisis.

Recent Activity

Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.

Alternative Names

To prohibit discrimination based on political affiliation in granting disaster assistance.

To prohibit discrimination based on political affiliation in granting disaster assistance.

Stopping Political Discrimination in Disaster Assistance Act

Stopping Political Discrimination in Disaster Assistance Act

To prohibit discrimination based on political affiliation in granting disaster assistance.

Associated Legislation

undefined

Policy Areas

undefined

Potential Impact

undefined

Sponsors and Supporters

Rep. Perry, Scott [R-PA-10]

Rep. Perry, Scott [R-PA-10]

Rep. Perry, Scott [R-PA-10]

Cosponsors and Supporters

Rep. Moore, Tim [R-NC-14]

Committees and Subcommittees

Transportation and Infrastructure Committee

Variations and Revisions

question involves the transfer of certain defense articles and services to Israel. The resolution is being considered by the US Congress as a way to voice concerns about the potential impact of this sale on regional stability and US national security interests. The resolution highlights the importance of congressional oversight in matters of foreign military sales and emphasizes the need for transparency and accountability in such transactions. It also raises questions about the potential consequences of providing advanced military equipment to Israel, particularly in light of ongoing conflicts in the region. Supporters of the resolution argue that it is necessary to carefully consider the implications of the proposed sale and ensure that it aligns with US foreign policy objectives. They believe that Congress has a responsibility to weigh the potential risks and benefits of such transactions before approving them. Opponents of the resolution, on the other hand, argue that the proposed sale is crucial for maintaining Israel's security and stability in a volatile region. They believe that the US has a strategic interest in supporting Israel's defense capabilities and that the sale of defense articles and services is in line with longstanding US-Israeli relations. Overall, Bill 119 SJRes 32 reflects the ongoing debate within Congress about the appropriate role of the US in providing military support to foreign allies. The resolution underscores the complex and nuanced nature of US foreign policy decisions and the need for careful consideration of the potential consequences of such actions.

Recent Activity

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.

Alternative Names

A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign military sale to the Government of Israel of certain defense articles and services.

A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign military sale to the Government of Israel of certain defense articles and services.

Associated Legislation

undefined

Policy Areas

undefined

Potential Impact

undefined

Sponsors and Supporters

Sen. Sanders, Bernard [I-VT]

Cosponsors and Supporters

undefined

Committees and Subcommittees

Foreign Relations Committee

Variations and Revisions

undefined

prevalence of scams and to promote education on how to prevent government imposter scams and other types of fraudulent activities. The resolution highlights the importance of educating the public on how to recognize and avoid falling victim to scams, which can have serious financial and emotional consequences. By designating a specific day for this purpose, the resolution seeks to bring attention to the issue and encourage individuals to take proactive steps to protect themselves and their loved ones from falling prey to fraudulent schemes.

Recent Activity

Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S1616-1617; text: CR S1609-1610)

Alternative Names

A resolution designating March 6, 2025, as "National Slam the Scam Day" to raise awareness about pervasive scams and to promote education to prevent government imposter scams and other types of scams.

A resolution designating March 6, 2025, as "National Slam the Scam Day" to raise awareness about pervasive scams and to promote education to prevent government imposter scams and other types of scams.

Associated Legislation

undefined

Policy Areas

undefined

Potential Impact

undefined

Sponsors and Supporters

Sen. Scott, Rick [R-FL]

Sen. Scott, Rick [R-FL]

Cosponsors and Supporters

Sen. Kelly, Mark [D-AZ]

Sen. Gillibrand, Kirsten E. [D-NY]

Sen. Collins, Susan M. [R-ME]

Sen. Moody, Ashley [R-FL]

Sen. Blumenthal, Richard [D-CT]

Sen. Rounds, Mike [R-SD]

Committees and Subcommittees

undefined

Variations and Revisions

undefined

II of the Social Security Act. Specifically, this bill seeks to exempt certain drugs from the Part D manufacturer discount program. The Part D manufacturer discount program was established to provide discounts on prescription drugs to Medicare beneficiaries. However, some drugs are currently required to participate in this program, which can limit access to certain medications for patients. If passed, Bill 119 HR 1922 would allow certain drugs to be exempt from the Part D manufacturer discount program. This exemption would provide more flexibility for manufacturers and potentially increase access to a wider range of medications for Medicare beneficiaries. Overall, this bill addresses concerns about access to prescription drugs for Medicare beneficiaries and aims to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the Medicare program. It will be important to monitor the progress of this bill as it moves through the legislative process to see how it may impact Medicare beneficiaries and the healthcare system as a whole.

Recent Activity

Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Alternative Names

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to exempt certain drugs from the part D manufacturer discount program under the Medicare program.

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to exempt certain drugs from the part D manufacturer discount program under the Medicare program.

Associated Legislation

undefined

Policy Areas

undefined

Potential Impact

undefined

Sponsors and Supporters

Rep. Garbarino, Andrew R. [R-NY-2]

Cosponsors and Supporters

Rep. Harshbarger, Diana [R-TN-1]

Rep. Suozzi, Thomas R. [D-NY-3]

Committees and Subcommittees

Ways and Means Committee

Energy and Commerce Committee

Variations and Revisions

undefined

se of this bill is to require an annual report to be submitted to Congress detailing taxpayer-funded projects that are over budget and behind schedule. The bill aims to increase transparency and accountability in government spending by ensuring that taxpayers are informed about projects that are not meeting their deadlines or exceeding their budget. By requiring this annual report, Congress will be able to identify and address any inefficiencies or mismanagement in taxpayer-funded projects. If passed, the bill would mandate that federal agencies provide detailed information on any projects that are over budget by 10% or more, or behind schedule by 6 months or more. This information would include the reasons for the delays or cost overruns, as well as any steps being taken to address the issues and bring the project back on track. Overall, Bill 119 s 766 seeks to hold government agencies accountable for how they are using taxpayer dollars and ensure that projects are completed in a timely and cost-effective manner. It is a step towards promoting transparency and efficiency in government spending.

Recent Activity

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.

Alternative Names

A bill to require an annual report of taxpayer-funded projects that are over budget and behind schedule.

A bill to require an annual report of taxpayer-funded projects that are over budget and behind schedule.

Billion Dollar Boondoggle Act of 2025

Billion Dollar Boondoggle Act of 2025

A bill to require an annual report of taxpayer-funded projects that are over budget and behind schedule.

Associated Legislation

undefined

Policy Areas

undefined

Potential Impact

undefined

Sponsors and Supporters

Sen. Ernst, Joni [R-IA]

Sen. Ernst, Joni [R-IA]

Sen. Ernst, Joni [R-IA]

Cosponsors and Supporters

Sen. Hassan, Margaret Wood [D-NH]

Committees and Subcommittees

Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee

Variations and Revisions