Hunter Zhou

of this bill is to repeal certain executive orders that have been issued by the President of the United States. The bill specifically targets executive orders that the sponsors of the bill believe overstep the authority of the President or infringe upon the powers of Congress. The sponsors argue that these executive orders are unconstitutional and should be repealed in order to restore the balance of power between the branches of government. If passed, this bill would require the President to rescind the specified executive orders within a certain timeframe. It would also prevent the President from issuing similar executive orders in the future without the approval of Congress. Supporters of the bill argue that it is necessary to rein in the power of the executive branch and prevent future Presidents from overstepping their authority. However, opponents of the bill argue that it is an attempt to undermine the President's ability to govern effectively and could lead to political gridlock. Overall, Bill 119 HR 1781 is a controversial piece of legislation that raises important questions about the balance of power in the US government. It will be interesting to see how this bill progresses through Congress and what impact it may have on the relationship between the executive and legislative branches.

Recent Activity

Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Foreign Affairs, Natural Resources, Ways and Means, Oversight and Government Reform, Agriculture, Armed Services, Financial Services, and Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Alternative Names

To repeal certain executive orders.

To repeal certain executive orders.

Associated Legislation

undefined

Policy Areas

undefined

Potential Impact

undefined

Sponsors and Supporters

Rep. Castor, Kathy [D-FL-14]

Rep. Castor, Kathy [D-FL-14]

Rep. Castor, Kathy [D-FL-14]

Cosponsors and Supporters

Rep. Tonko, Paul [D-NY-20]

Rep. Tonko, Paul [D-NY-20]

Rep. Ocasio-Cortez, Alexandria [D-NY-14]

Rep. Ansari, Yassamin [D-AZ-3]

Rep. Takano, Mark [D-CA-39]

Rep. Cleaver, Emanuel [D-MO-5]

Rep. Tonko, Paul [D-NY-20]

Rep. Ocasio-Cortez, Alexandria [D-NY-14]

Rep. Ansari, Yassamin [D-AZ-3]

Rep. Takano, Mark [D-CA-39]

Rep. Cleaver, Emanuel [D-MO-5]

Rep. Casten, Sean [D-IL-6]

Rep. Mullin, Kevin [D-CA-15]

Rep. Matsui, Doris O. [D-CA-7]

Rep. Levin, Mike [D-CA-49]

Rep. Brownley, Julia [D-CA-26]

Committees and Subcommittees

Transportation and Infrastructure Committee

Financial Services Committee

Armed Services Committee

Agriculture Committee

Oversight and Government Reform Committee

Ways and Means Committee

Natural Resources Committee

Foreign Affairs Committee

Energy and Commerce Committee

Variations and Revisions

undefined

d States' reliance on foreign sources for critical minerals and rare earth elements. These minerals and elements are essential for a variety of industries, including technology, defense, and energy. The bill requires the Department of the Interior to submit reports on critical mineral and rare earth element resources around the world. These reports will provide valuable information on the availability and distribution of these resources, helping to inform US policy and decision-making. Additionally, the bill calls for the development of advanced mining, refining, separation, and processing technologies. By investing in these technologies, the United States can reduce its dependence on foreign sources and strengthen its domestic supply chain for critical minerals and rare earth elements. Overall, Bill 119 s 789 aims to promote the development of a strategic approach to addressing the United States' critical mineral and rare earth element needs. By increasing domestic production and investing in advanced technologies, the US can enhance its national security and economic competitiveness.

Recent Activity

Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Hearings held.

Alternative Names

A bill to require reports on critical mineral and rare earth element resources around the world and a strategy for the development of advanced mining, refining, separation, and processing technologies, and for other purposes.

A bill to require reports on critical mineral and rare earth element resources around the world and a strategy for the development of advanced mining, refining, separation, and processing technologies, and for other purposes.

Critical Minerals Security Act of 2025

Critical Minerals Security Act of 2025

A bill to require reports on critical mineral and rare earth element resources around the world and a strategy for the development of advanced mining, refining, separation, and processing technologies, and for other purposes.

Critical Minerals Security Act of 2025

Critical Minerals Security Act of 2025

A bill to require reports on critical mineral and rare earth element resources around the world and a strategy for the development of advanced mining, refining, separation, and processing technologies, and for other purposes.

Associated Legislation

undefined

Policy Areas

Energy

Potential Impact

Sponsors and Supporters

Sen. Cornyn, John [R-TX]

Sen. Cornyn, John [R-TX]

Sen. Cornyn, John [R-TX]

Sen. Cornyn, John [R-TX]

Sen. Cornyn, John [R-TX]

Cosponsors and Supporters

Sen. Warner, Mark R. [D-VA]

Sen. Young, Todd [R-IN]

Sen. Hickenlooper, John W. [D-CO]

Sen. King, Angus S., Jr. [I-ME]

Sen. Warner, Mark R. [D-VA]

Sen. Young, Todd [R-IN]

Sen. Hickenlooper, John W. [D-CO]

Sen. King, Angus S., Jr. [I-ME]

Sen. Lankford, James [R-OK]

Committees and Subcommittees

Energy and Natural Resources Committee

Energy and Natural Resources Committee

Variations and Revisions

oss proceeds by brokers who facilitate digital asset sales. The rule in question requires brokers who regularly provide services for digital asset sales to report the gross proceeds from these transactions to the IRS. The resolution falls under chapter 8 of title 5 of the United States Code, which allows Congress to review and potentially overturn regulations proposed by federal agencies. In this case, Congress is seeking to disapprove of the IRS rule on the grounds that it may impose unnecessary burdens on brokers and hinder the growth of the digital asset market. Supporters of the resolution argue that the rule could stifle innovation and investment in the digital asset space, while opponents believe that reporting gross proceeds is necessary for tax compliance and enforcement. The resolution is currently under consideration in Congress, where lawmakers will debate its merits before voting on whether to approve or reject the IRS rule. Overall, Bill 119 SJRes 3 is a significant piece of legislation that highlights the ongoing debate over the regulation of digital assets and the role of government oversight in this rapidly evolving industry.

Recent Activity

Message received in Senate: Returned to the Senate pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 212.

Alternative Names

A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Internal Revenue Service relating to "Gross Proceeds Reporting by Brokers That Regularly Provide Services Effectuating Digital Asset Sales".

A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Internal Revenue Service relating to "Gross Proceeds Reporting by Brokers That Regularly Provide Services Effectuating Digital Asset Sales".

A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Internal Revenue Service relating to "Gross Proceeds Reporting by Brokers That Regularly Provide Services Effectuating Digital Asset Sales".

A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Internal Revenue Service relating to "Gross Proceeds Reporting by Brokers That Regularly Provide Services Effectuating Digital Asset Sales".

Associated Legislation

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Internal Revenue Service relating to "Gross Proceeds Reporting by Brokers That Regularly Provide Services Effectuating Digital Asset Sales".

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Internal Revenue Service relating to "Gross Proceeds Reporting by Brokers That Regularly Provide Services Effectuating Digital Asset Sales".

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Internal Revenue Service relating to "Gross Proceeds Reporting by Brokers That Regularly Provide Services Effectuating Digital Asset Sales".

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Internal Revenue Service relating to "Gross Proceeds Reporting by Brokers That Regularly Provide Services Effectuating Digital Asset Sales".

Returning Senate Joint Resolution 3 to the Senate.

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Internal Revenue Service relating to "Gross Proceeds Reporting by Brokers That Regularly Provide Services Effectuating Digital Asset Sales".

Returning Senate Joint Resolution 3 to the Senate.

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Internal Revenue Service relating to "Gross Proceeds Reporting by Brokers That Regularly Provide Services Effectuating Digital Asset Sales".

Returning Senate Joint Resolution 3 to the Senate.

Policy Areas

Taxation

Potential Impact

Administrative law and regulatory procedures

Currency

Digital media

Financial services and investments

Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

Tax administration and collection, taxpayers

Sponsors and Supporters

Sen. Cruz, Ted [R-TX]

Sen. Cruz, Ted [R-TX]

Sen. Cruz, Ted [R-TX]

Sen. Cruz, Ted [R-TX]

Sen. Cruz, Ted [R-TX]

Sen. Cruz, Ted [R-TX]

Sen. Cruz, Ted [R-TX]

Sen. Cruz, Ted [R-TX]

Sen. Cruz, Ted [R-TX]

Sen. Cruz, Ted [R-TX]

Sen. Cruz, Ted [R-TX]

Sen. Cruz, Ted [R-TX]

Sen. Cruz, Ted [R-TX]

Sen. Cruz, Ted [R-TX]

Sen. Cruz, Ted [R-TX]

Sen. Cruz, Ted [R-TX]

Sen. Cruz, Ted [R-TX]

Sen. Cruz, Ted [R-TX]

Cosponsors and Supporters

Sen. Lummis, Cynthia M. [R-WY]

Sen. Hagerty, Bill [R-TN]

Sen. Tillis, Thomas [R-NC]

Sen. Sheehy, Tim [R-MT]

Sen. Budd, Ted [R-NC]

Sen. Lummis, Cynthia M. [R-WY]

Sen. Hagerty, Bill [R-TN]

Sen. Tillis, Thomas [R-NC]

Sen. Sheehy, Tim [R-MT]

Sen. Budd, Ted [R-NC]

Sen. Moreno, Bernie [R-OH]

Sen. Lummis, Cynthia M. [R-WY]

Sen. Hagerty, Bill [R-TN]

Sen. Tillis, Thomas [R-NC]

Sen. Sheehy, Tim [R-MT]

Sen. Budd, Ted [R-NC]

Sen. Moreno, Bernie [R-OH]

Sen. Curtis, John R. [R-UT]

Sen. Cotton, Tom [R-AR]

Sen. Lee, Mike [R-UT]

Sen. Banks, Jim [R-IN]

Sen. Lummis, Cynthia M. [R-WY]

Sen. Hagerty, Bill [R-TN]

Sen. Tillis, Thomas [R-NC]

Sen. Sheehy, Tim [R-MT]

Sen. Budd, Ted [R-NC]

Sen. Moreno, Bernie [R-OH]

Sen. Curtis, John R. [R-UT]

Sen. Cotton, Tom [R-AR]

Sen. Lee, Mike [R-UT]

Sen. Banks, Jim [R-IN]

Sen. Daines, Steve [R-MT]

Sen. Lummis, Cynthia M. [R-WY]

Sen. Hagerty, Bill [R-TN]

Sen. Tillis, Thomas [R-NC]

Sen. Sheehy, Tim [R-MT]

Sen. Budd, Ted [R-NC]

Sen. Moreno, Bernie [R-OH]

Sen. Curtis, John R. [R-UT]

Sen. Cotton, Tom [R-AR]

Sen. Lee, Mike [R-UT]

Sen. Banks, Jim [R-IN]

Sen. Daines, Steve [R-MT]

Sen. Blackburn, Marsha [R-TN]

Sen. Lummis, Cynthia M. [R-WY]

Sen. Hagerty, Bill [R-TN]

Sen. Tillis, Thomas [R-NC]

Sen. Sheehy, Tim [R-MT]

Sen. Budd, Ted [R-NC]

Sen. Moreno, Bernie [R-OH]

Sen. Curtis, John R. [R-UT]

Sen. Cotton, Tom [R-AR]

Sen. Lee, Mike [R-UT]

Sen. Banks, Jim [R-IN]

Sen. Daines, Steve [R-MT]

Sen. Blackburn, Marsha [R-TN]

Sen. Scott, Tim [R-SC]

Sen. McCormick, David [R-PA]

Committees and Subcommittees

Finance Committee

Finance Committee

Variations and Revisions

th the aim of increasing awareness about the rare form of cancer known as chordoma. Chordoma is a type of sarcoma cancer that affects the bones of the skull and spine, and is often difficult to diagnose and treat. The bill highlights the need for increased research funding and resources to better understand and combat chordoma. It also calls for greater public awareness and education about the disease, in order to improve early detection and treatment outcomes. If passed, the bill would designate July as "Chordoma Cancer Awareness Month" and encourage individuals, organizations, and communities to participate in activities and events to raise awareness about the disease. Additionally, the bill would urge healthcare providers to educate themselves and their patients about chordoma, in order to improve diagnosis and treatment options. Overall, Bill 119 H.Res. 172 seeks to bring attention to the challenges faced by individuals with chordoma, and to promote efforts to improve research, diagnosis, and treatment for this rare form of cancer.

Recent Activity

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Alternative Names

Raising awareness for the sarcoma cancer chordoma.

Raising awareness for the sarcoma cancer chordoma.

Associated Legislation

undefined

Policy Areas

Health

Potential Impact

Sponsors and Supporters

Rep. Johnson, Henry C. "Hank" [D-GA-4]

Rep. Johnson, Henry C. "Hank" [D-GA-4]

Rep. Johnson, Henry C. "Hank" [D-GA-4]

Cosponsors and Supporters

Rep. McBath, Lucy [D-GA-6]

Rep. Wilson, Frederica S. [D-FL-24]

Rep. Velázquez, Nydia M. [D-NY-7]

Del. Norton, Eleanor Holmes [D-DC-At Large]

Committees and Subcommittees

Energy and Commerce Committee

Variations and Revisions

ions from being applied to amateur radio antennas. The bill seeks to protect the rights of amateur radio operators to install and maintain antennas on their property, even if there are restrictions in place by homeowners associations or other private entities. The bill is designed to ensure that amateur radio operators have the ability to effectively communicate and participate in their hobby without unnecessary restrictions. By prohibiting the application of certain private land use restrictions to amateur station antennas, the bill aims to promote the continued growth and development of amateur radio in the United States. In addition to addressing land use restrictions, the bill also includes provisions for the enforcement of these regulations and outlines penalties for violations. Overall, the Amateur Radio Parity Act is intended to support the amateur radio community and ensure that operators have the necessary resources to pursue their hobby without unnecessary obstacles.

Recent Activity

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Alternative Names

To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to prohibit the application of certain private land use restrictions to amateur station antennas, and for other purposes.

To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to prohibit the application of certain private land use restrictions to amateur station antennas, and for other purposes.

Associated Legislation

undefined

Policy Areas

undefined

Potential Impact

undefined

Sponsors and Supporters

Rep. Pfluger, August [R-TX-11]

Rep. Pfluger, August [R-TX-11]

Cosponsors and Supporters

Rep. Courtney, Joe [D-CT-2]

Rep. Courtney, Joe [D-CT-2]

Rep. Weber, Randy K. Sr. [R-TX-14]

Committees and Subcommittees

Energy and Commerce Committee

Variations and Revisions

undefined