Gloria Morris

nservation standards for commercial refrigerators, freezers, and refrigerator-freezers. The resolution falls under chapter 8 of title 5 of the United States Code, which allows Congress to review and potentially overturn regulations proposed by federal agencies. The rule in question, proposed by the Department of Energy, seeks to establish energy conservation standards for commercial refrigeration equipment. These standards would impact the energy efficiency of commercial refrigerators, freezers, and refrigerator-freezers, with the goal of reducing energy consumption and promoting environmental sustainability. Supporters of the resolution argue that the proposed rule may impose unnecessary burdens on businesses and consumers, potentially leading to increased costs and reduced choices in the market for commercial refrigeration equipment. They believe that Congress should have the authority to review and reject regulations that could have negative economic impacts. Opponents of the resolution, on the other hand, argue that the energy conservation standards are necessary to address climate change and reduce energy consumption. They believe that the rule will help to promote energy efficiency and environmental sustainability, ultimately benefiting both businesses and consumers in the long run. Overall, Bill 119 SJRes 44 represents a debate over the balance between economic considerations and environmental concerns in the regulation of commercial refrigeration equipment. The resolution will be subject to further discussion and debate in Congress before a final decision is reached on whether to disapprove of the Department of Energy's proposed rule.

Recent Activity

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

Alternative Names

A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Energy relating to "Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Commercial Refrigerators, Freezers, and Refrigerator-Freezers".

A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Energy relating to "Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Commercial Refrigerators, Freezers, and Refrigerator-Freezers".

Associated Legislation

undefined

Policy Areas

Energy

Potential Impact

undefined

Sponsors and Supporters

Sen. Moody, Ashley [R-FL]

Sen. Moody, Ashley [R-FL]

Sen. Moody, Ashley [R-FL]

Sen. Moody, Ashley [R-FL]

Cosponsors and Supporters

Sen. Ernst, Joni [R-IA]

Sen. Ernst, Joni [R-IA]

Sen. Cotton, Tom [R-AR]

Committees and Subcommittees

Energy and Natural Resources Committee

Variations and Revisions

undefined

and ideals of National Women's History Month. This bill highlights the importance of celebrating the contributions and achievements of women throughout history, as well as promoting gender equality and women's rights. The resolution acknowledges the significant role that women have played in shaping our society and culture, and calls on the American people to honor and commemorate the accomplishments of women in various fields such as politics, science, education, and the arts. It also encourages schools, organizations, and communities to participate in activities and events that promote awareness and appreciation of women's history. Furthermore, the resolution emphasizes the need to continue working towards gender equality and empowering women to reach their full potential. It recognizes the ongoing challenges and barriers that women face, and calls for continued efforts to address issues such as gender discrimination, pay equity, and access to education and healthcare. Overall, Bill 119 HRES 280 serves as a reminder of the importance of recognizing and celebrating the achievements of women, and encourages individuals and communities to support the goals and ideals of National Women's History Month.

Recent Activity

Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.

Alternative Names

Supporting the goals and ideals of National Women's History Month.

Supporting the goals and ideals of National Women's History Month.

Associated Legislation

undefined

Policy Areas

Civil Rights and Liberties, Minority Issues

Potential Impact

undefined

Sponsors and Supporters

Rep. Thompson, Mike [D-CA-4]

Rep. Thompson, Mike [D-CA-4]

Rep. Thompson, Mike [D-CA-4]

Cosponsors and Supporters

Rep. Cherfilus-McCormick, Sheila [D-FL-20]

Rep. Costa, Jim [D-CA-21]

Rep. McClellan, Jennifer L. [D-VA-4]

Rep. Casten, Sean [D-IL-6]

Rep. Brown, Shontel M. [D-OH-11]

Rep. DeGette, Diana [D-CO-1]

Rep. Carter, Troy A. [D-LA-2]

Rep. Sewell, Terri A. [D-AL-7]

Rep. Dingell, Debbie [D-MI-6]

Del. Norton, Eleanor Holmes [D-DC-At Large]

Rep. Krishnamoorthi, Raja [D-IL-8]

Rep. Beatty, Joyce [D-OH-3]

Rep. Schakowsky, Janice D. [D-IL-9]

Rep. Barragán, Nanette Diaz [D-CA-44]

Rep. Ross, Deborah K. [D-NC-2]

Committees and Subcommittees

Oversight and Government Reform Committee

Variations and Revisions

undefined

to any state or local government that implements laws granting reparations for slavery. The bill seeks to prohibit the use of taxpayer funds to support reparations programs, arguing that such initiatives could lead to unfair financial burdens on certain taxpayers and create divisions among different groups within society. The bill is designed to ensure that the government does not provide financial assistance to states or localities that choose to pursue reparations for slavery, as proponents of the bill believe that such measures could be divisive and potentially harmful to the country as a whole. The bill also includes provisions for other purposes, although specific details on these additional purposes are not provided in the summary. Overall, Bill 119 HR 2100 seeks to prevent the use of taxpayer funds to support reparations for slavery and to maintain a stance of neutrality on the issue within the federal government. The bill is likely to spark debate and controversy among lawmakers and the public, as it addresses a highly sensitive and complex issue in American history.

Recent Activity

Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.

Alternative Names

To prohibit the United States Government from providing bailouts or other financial assistance to any State or local government that enacts any law providing reparations for slavery, and for other purposes.

To prohibit the United States Government from providing bailouts or other financial assistance to any State or local government that enacts any law providing reparations for slavery, and for other purposes.

No Bailouts for Reparations Act

No Bailouts for Reparations Act

To prohibit the United States Government from providing bailouts or other financial assistance to any State or local government that enacts any law providing reparations for slavery, and for other purposes.

Associated Legislation

undefined

Policy Areas

undefined

Potential Impact

undefined

Sponsors and Supporters

Rep. Babin, Brian [R-TX-36]

Rep. Babin, Brian [R-TX-36]

Cosponsors and Supporters

undefined

Committees and Subcommittees

Oversight and Government Reform Committee

Variations and Revisions

g of Supreme Court proceedings. The bill seeks to increase transparency and accessibility to the highest court in the United States by allowing the public to view oral arguments and other proceedings through televised broadcasts. If passed, the bill would require the Supreme Court to permit the televising of all open sessions, including oral arguments and the announcement of opinions. The bill also includes provisions to ensure that the televising of proceedings does not interfere with the administration of justice or compromise the integrity of the court. Supporters of the bill argue that televising Supreme Court proceedings would provide the public with a better understanding of the judicial process and increase accountability of the court. They believe that allowing the public to view proceedings would promote transparency and trust in the judicial system. Opponents of the bill, however, raise concerns about the potential negative impact of televising Supreme Court proceedings. They argue that televising proceedings could lead to sensationalism, distortions of the legal process, and compromise the impartiality of the court. Overall, Bill 119 s 1146 is a controversial piece of legislation that seeks to increase transparency and accessibility to the Supreme Court through televised broadcasts. The bill has sparked debate among lawmakers, legal experts, and the public about the potential benefits and drawbacks of televising Supreme Court proceedings.

Recent Activity

Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S1874)

Alternative Names

A bill to permit the televising of Supreme Court proceedings.

A bill to permit the televising of Supreme Court proceedings.

Associated Legislation

undefined

Policy Areas

undefined

Potential Impact

undefined

Sponsors and Supporters

Sen. Durbin, Richard J. [D-IL]

Sen. Durbin, Richard J. [D-IL]

Cosponsors and Supporters

Sen. Grassley, Chuck [R-IA]

Sen. Blumenthal, Richard [D-CT]

Sen. Klobuchar, Amy [D-MN]

Committees and Subcommittees

Judiciary Committee

Variations and Revisions

undefined

to increase teacher salaries. The bill recognizes the importance of attracting and retaining high-quality educators by addressing the issue of low teacher salaries. The grants provided by this bill will assist State educational agencies in implementing strategies to raise teacher salaries, ultimately improving the overall quality of education in the United States. In addition to increasing teacher salaries, the bill also aims to support other purposes related to enhancing the education system. Overall, Bill 119 HR 2021 seeks to address the issue of low teacher salaries by providing financial support to State educational agencies. By increasing teacher salaries, the bill aims to attract and retain talented educators, ultimately benefiting students and improving the quality of education in the United States.

Recent Activity

Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.

Alternative Names

To provide grants to State educational agencies to support State efforts to increase teacher salaries, and for other purposes.

To provide grants to State educational agencies to support State efforts to increase teacher salaries, and for other purposes.

American Teacher Act

American Teacher Act

To provide grants to State educational agencies to support State efforts to increase teacher salaries, and for other purposes.

Associated Legislation

undefined

Policy Areas

Education

Potential Impact

Sponsors and Supporters

Rep. Wilson, Frederica S. [D-FL-24]

Rep. Wilson, Frederica S. [D-FL-24]

Rep. Wilson, Frederica S. [D-FL-24]

Cosponsors and Supporters

Rep. Adams, Alma S. [D-NC-12]

Rep. Bonamici, Suzanne [D-OR-1]

Rep. Brown, Shontel M. [D-OH-11]

Rep. Carbajal, Salud O. [D-CA-24]

Rep. Carson, André [D-IN-7]

Rep. Castor, Kathy [D-FL-14]

Rep. Casten, Sean [D-IL-6]

Rep. Cherfilus-McCormick, Sheila [D-FL-20]

Rep. Chu, Judy [D-CA-28]

Rep. Clarke, Yvette D. [D-NY-9]

Rep. Cleaver, Emanuel [D-MO-5]

Rep. Clyburn, James E. [D-SC-6]

Rep. Watson Coleman, Bonnie [D-NJ-12]

Rep. Courtney, Joe [D-CT-2]

Rep. Cuellar, Henry [D-TX-28]

Rep. Davis, Danny K. [D-IL-7]

Rep. Dean, Madeleine [D-PA-4]

Rep. DeLauro, Rosa L. [D-CT-3]

Rep. Deluzio, Christopher R. [D-PA-17]

Rep. Dingell, Debbie [D-MI-6]

Rep. Espaillat, Adriano [D-NY-13]

Rep. Evans, Dwight [D-PA-3]

Rep. Foushee, Valerie P. [D-NC-4]

Rep. Frost, Maxwell [D-FL-10]

Rep. Gottheimer, Josh [D-NJ-5]

Rep. Green, Al [D-TX-9]

Rep. Grijalva, Raúl M. [D-AZ-7]

Rep. Hayes, Jahana [D-CT-5]

Del. Norton, Eleanor Holmes [D-DC-At Large]

Rep. Hoyle, Val T. [D-OR-4]

Rep. Jackson, Jonathan L. [D-IL-1]

Rep. Jayapal, Pramila [D-WA-7]

Rep. Johnson, Henry C. "Hank" [D-GA-4]

Rep. Kamlager-Dove, Sydney [D-CA-37]

Rep. Keating, William R. [D-MA-9]

Rep. Krishnamoorthi, Raja [D-IL-8]

Rep. Landsman, Greg [D-OH-1]

Rep. Lieu, Ted [D-CA-36]

Rep. Lynch, Stephen F. [D-MA-8]

Rep. Magaziner, Seth [D-RI-2]

Rep. McBath, Lucy [D-GA-6]

Rep. McGovern, James P. [D-MA-2]

Rep. McIver, LaMonica [D-NJ-10]

Rep. Menendez, Robert [D-NJ-8]

Rep. Meng, Grace [D-NY-6]

Rep. Moore, Gwen [D-WI-4]

Rep. Moskowitz, Jared [D-FL-23]

Rep. Mrvan, Frank J. [D-IN-1]

Rep. Mullin, Kevin [D-CA-15]

Rep. Neguse, Joe [D-CO-2]

Rep. Norcross, Donald [D-NJ-1]

Rep. Ocasio-Cortez, Alexandria [D-NY-14]

Rep. Omar, Ilhan [D-MN-5]

Rep. Perez, Marie Gluesenkamp [D-WA-3]

Rep. Pingree, Chellie [D-ME-1]

Rep. Pocan, Mark [D-WI-2]

Rep. Pressley, Ayanna [D-MA-7]

Rep. Quigley, Mike [D-IL-5]

Rep. Raskin, Jamie [D-MD-8]

Rep. Ross, Deborah K. [D-NC-2]

Rep. Salinas, Andrea [D-OR-6]

Rep. Sánchez, Linda T. [D-CA-38]

Rep. Schakowsky, Janice D. [D-IL-9]

Rep. Scholten, Hillary J. [D-MI-3]

Rep. Sewell, Terri A. [D-AL-7]

Rep. Sherrill, Mikie [D-NJ-11]

Rep. Sorensen, Eric [D-IL-17]

Rep. Stevens, Haley M. [D-MI-11]

Rep. Sykes, Emilia Strong [D-OH-13]

Rep. Takano, Mark [D-CA-39]

Rep. Thanedar, Shri [D-MI-13]

Rep. Thompson, Bennie G. [D-MS-2]

Rep. Tlaib, Rashida [D-MI-12]

Rep. Tokuda, Jill N. [D-HI-2]

Rep. Velázquez, Nydia M. [D-NY-7]

Rep. Williams, Nikema [D-GA-5]

Rep. Fitzpatrick, Brian K. [R-PA-1]

Committees and Subcommittees

Education and Workforce Committee

Variations and Revisions