Giana Jackson

e State of California into trust for the benefit of the Pit River Tribe. The Pit River Tribe is a federally recognized Native American tribe located in northeastern California. The bill specifically identifies the land parcels that will be taken into trust for the Pit River Tribe, totaling approximately 1,900 acres. This land transfer is intended to provide the tribe with additional resources and opportunities for economic development, cultural preservation, and self-governance. Supporters of the bill argue that it is a necessary step to address historical injustices and support the sovereignty and self-determination of the Pit River Tribe. They believe that transferring the land into trust will help the tribe to better protect and manage their natural resources, as well as promote economic growth and community well-being. Opponents of the bill may raise concerns about the potential impact on local communities, land use regulations, and environmental conservation efforts. They may also question the need for the federal government to transfer land into trust for a specific tribe. Overall, Bill 119 hr 2400 represents an important opportunity for the Pit River Tribe to strengthen their tribal lands and resources. It will be important for lawmakers to carefully consider the potential implications and benefits of this land transfer for both the tribe and the surrounding communities.

Recent Activity

Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.

Alternative Names

Pit River Land Transfer Act of 2025

Pit River Land Transfer Act of 2025

To take certain Federal land in the State of California into trust for the benefit of the Pit River Tribe.

Associated Legislation

undefined

Policy Areas

undefined

Potential Impact

undefined

Sponsors and Supporters

Rep. LaMalfa, Doug [R-CA-1]

Rep. LaMalfa, Doug [R-CA-1]

Cosponsors and Supporters

undefined

Committees and Subcommittees

undefined

Variations and Revisions

es in the United States. These devices are used to modify semi-automatic firearms into fully automatic weapons, which are illegal under federal law. The bill proposes to amend the current law by expanding the definition of a machinegun conversion device to include any part or combination of parts designed and intended to convert a semi-automatic firearm into a machinegun. This would make it illegal to import, sell, or possess these devices. Additionally, the bill would increase penalties for those found in violation of the law. Individuals caught importing or selling machinegun conversion devices could face fines and up to 10 years in prison. Possession of these devices would also be punishable by fines and up to 5 years in prison. Overall, Bill 119 HR 2105 seeks to strengthen existing laws and regulations to prevent the illegal modification of firearms into fully automatic weapons. By targeting the importation and proliferation of machinegun conversion devices, the bill aims to enhance public safety and reduce the risk of gun violence in the United States.

Recent Activity

Referred to the Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence.

Alternative Names

To address the importation and proliferation of machinegun conversion devices.

To address the importation and proliferation of machinegun conversion devices.

Associated Legislation

undefined

Policy Areas

Crime and Law Enforcement

Potential Impact

Sponsors and Supporters

Rep. Casten, Sean [D-IL-6]

Rep. Casten, Sean [D-IL-6]

Rep. Casten, Sean [D-IL-6]

Rep. Casten, Sean [D-IL-6]

Rep. Casten, Sean [D-IL-6]

Cosponsors and Supporters

Rep. Johnson, Henry C. "Hank" [D-GA-4]

Del. Norton, Eleanor Holmes [D-DC-At Large]

Rep. Watson Coleman, Bonnie [D-NJ-12]

Rep. Garcia, Sylvia R. [D-TX-29]

Rep. Titus, Dina [D-NV-1]

Rep. Scanlon, Mary Gay [D-PA-5]

Rep. Stevens, Haley M. [D-MI-11]

Rep. Neguse, Joe [D-CO-2]

Rep. Fletcher, Lizzie [D-TX-7]

Rep. Magaziner, Seth [D-RI-2]

Rep. Balint, Becca [D-VT-At Large]

Rep. Velázquez, Nydia M. [D-NY-7]

Rep. Landsman, Greg [D-OH-1]

Rep. Chu, Judy [D-CA-28]

Rep. Quigley, Mike [D-IL-5]

Rep. Moore, Gwen [D-WI-4]

Rep. Clarke, Yvette D. [D-NY-9]

Rep. Crockett, Jasmine [D-TX-30]

Rep. Davis, Danny K. [D-IL-7]

Rep. Goldman, Daniel S. [D-NY-10]

Rep. Brown, Shontel M. [D-OH-11]

Rep. Lynch, Stephen F. [D-MA-8]

Rep. Auchincloss, Jake [D-MA-4]

Rep. Krishnamoorthi, Raja [D-IL-8]

Rep. Foushee, Valerie P. [D-NC-4]

Rep. Schrier, Kim [D-WA-8]

Rep. Connolly, Gerald E. [D-VA-11]

Rep. Brownley, Julia [D-CA-26]

Rep. Johnson, Henry C. "Hank" [D-GA-4]

Del. Norton, Eleanor Holmes [D-DC-At Large]

Rep. Watson Coleman, Bonnie [D-NJ-12]

Rep. Garcia, Sylvia R. [D-TX-29]

Rep. Titus, Dina [D-NV-1]

Rep. Scanlon, Mary Gay [D-PA-5]

Rep. Stevens, Haley M. [D-MI-11]

Rep. Neguse, Joe [D-CO-2]

Rep. Fletcher, Lizzie [D-TX-7]

Rep. Magaziner, Seth [D-RI-2]

Rep. Balint, Becca [D-VT-At Large]

Rep. Velázquez, Nydia M. [D-NY-7]

Rep. Landsman, Greg [D-OH-1]

Rep. Chu, Judy [D-CA-28]

Rep. Quigley, Mike [D-IL-5]

Rep. Moore, Gwen [D-WI-4]

Rep. Clarke, Yvette D. [D-NY-9]

Rep. Crockett, Jasmine [D-TX-30]

Rep. Davis, Danny K. [D-IL-7]

Rep. Goldman, Daniel S. [D-NY-10]

Rep. Brown, Shontel M. [D-OH-11]

Rep. Lynch, Stephen F. [D-MA-8]

Rep. Auchincloss, Jake [D-MA-4]

Rep. Krishnamoorthi, Raja [D-IL-8]

Rep. Foushee, Valerie P. [D-NC-4]

Rep. Schrier, Kim [D-WA-8]

Rep. Connolly, Gerald E. [D-VA-11]

Rep. Brownley, Julia [D-CA-26]

Rep. Min, Dave [D-CA-47]

Committees and Subcommittees

Homeland Security Committee

Judiciary Committee

Ways and Means Committee

Homeland Security Committee

Counterterrorism and Intelligence Subcommittee

Judiciary Committee

Ways and Means Committee

Variations and Revisions

of this bill is to mandate that a comprehensive assessment of earthquake resilience risks be conducted in order to better prepare for and mitigate the potential impact of earthquakes in the United States. The bill outlines specific requirements for this risk assessment, including the identification of high-risk areas, critical infrastructure that may be vulnerable to earthquakes, and potential strategies for improving resilience and preparedness. The assessment would be conducted by a designated federal agency in collaboration with state and local governments, as well as relevant stakeholders in the private sector. In addition to the risk assessment, the bill also includes provisions for the development of a national earthquake resilience strategy, which would outline specific goals and objectives for improving earthquake preparedness and response across the country. This strategy would be updated periodically to reflect new information and emerging threats. Overall, the Earthquake Resilience Risk Assessment Act aims to enhance the nation's ability to withstand and recover from earthquakes by providing a comprehensive understanding of the risks and vulnerabilities associated with seismic activity. By taking proactive measures to assess and address these risks, the bill seeks to protect lives, property, and critical infrastructure in the event of a major earthquake.

Recent Activity

Referred to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, and in addition to the Committees on Transportation and Infrastructure, and Natural Resources, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Alternative Names

To require an earthquake resilience risk assessment, and for other purposes.

To require an earthquake resilience risk assessment, and for other purposes.

To require an earthquake resilience risk assessment, and for other purposes.

To require an earthquake resilience risk assessment, and for other purposes.

Earthquake Resilience Act

Earthquake Resilience Act

To require an earthquake resilience risk assessment, and for other purposes.

Associated Legislation

undefined

Policy Areas

Science, Technology, Communications

Potential Impact

undefined

Sponsors and Supporters

Rep. Mullin, Kevin [D-CA-15]

Rep. Mullin, Kevin [D-CA-15]

Rep. Mullin, Kevin [D-CA-15]

Rep. Mullin, Kevin [D-CA-15]

Cosponsors and Supporters

Rep. Fong, Vince [R-CA-20]

Committees and Subcommittees

Natural Resources Committee

Transportation and Infrastructure Committee

Science, Space, and Technology Committee

Variations and Revisions

r certain medical procedures, specifically sex reassignment surgeries and hormonal therapies. The 340B program allows certain healthcare providers, such as hospitals and clinics that serve low-income populations, to purchase prescription drugs at discounted prices. The bill seeks to prevent these entities from using their savings from the 340B program to fund sex reassignment surgeries and hormonal therapies, as well as other purposes that may not align with the original intent of the program. Supporters of the bill argue that the 340B program should be used to provide essential medications and services to underserved communities, rather than funding elective procedures. Opponents of the bill argue that it unfairly targets transgender individuals and restricts their access to necessary medical care. They argue that healthcare decisions should be made between a patient and their healthcare provider, without government interference. Overall, Bill 119 HR 2197 raises important questions about the use of savings from the 340B program and the role of government in regulating healthcare services. It will be important to monitor the progress of this bill and consider the potential impact on both healthcare providers and patients.

Recent Activity

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Alternative Names

To prevent 340B covered entities from using savings derived for sex reassignment surgeries, hormonal therapies, and for other purposes.

To prevent 340B covered entities from using savings derived for sex reassignment surgeries, hormonal therapies, and for other purposes.

No 340B Savings for Transgender Care Act

No 340B Savings for Transgender Care Act

To prevent 340B covered entities from using savings derived for sex reassignment surgeries, hormonal therapies, and for other purposes.

Associated Legislation

undefined

Policy Areas

Health

Potential Impact

Sponsors and Supporters

Rep. Johnson, Dusty [R-SD-At Large]

Rep. Johnson, Dusty [R-SD-At Large]

Rep. Johnson, Dusty [R-SD-At Large]

Rep. Johnson, Dusty [R-SD-At Large]

Cosponsors and Supporters

Rep. Scott, Austin [R-GA-8]

Rep. Crenshaw, Dan [R-TX-2]

Rep. Rulli, Michael A. [R-OH-6]

Rep. Ezell, Mike [R-MS-4]

Rep. Bice, Stephanie I. [R-OK-5]

Rep. Moore, Barry [R-AL-1]

Rep. Rose, John W. [R-TN-6]

Rep. Scott, Austin [R-GA-8]

Rep. Crenshaw, Dan [R-TX-2]

Rep. Rulli, Michael A. [R-OH-6]

Rep. Ezell, Mike [R-MS-4]

Rep. Bice, Stephanie I. [R-OK-5]

Rep. Moore, Barry [R-AL-1]

Rep. Rose, John W. [R-TN-6]

Rep. Williams, Roger [R-TX-25]

Committees and Subcommittees

Energy and Commerce Committee

Variations and Revisions

f this bill is to require reporting on certain cost-share requirements related to energy projects. The bill would mandate that any entity receiving federal funding for energy projects must report on the cost-sharing arrangements involved. This reporting would provide transparency and accountability for how taxpayer dollars are being used in these projects. In addition to the reporting requirements, the bill also includes provisions for other purposes related to energy policy. These additional purposes could include measures to promote renewable energy, improve energy efficiency, or address other energy-related issues. Overall, Bill 119 hr 359 seeks to enhance oversight and transparency in energy projects that receive federal funding, while also potentially advancing energy policy goals.

Recent Activity

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

Alternative Names

To amend the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to require reporting relating to certain cost-share requirements, and for other purposes.

To amend the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to require reporting relating to certain cost-share requirements, and for other purposes.

Cost-Share Accountability Act of 2025

Cost-Share Accountability Act of 2025

To amend the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to require reporting relating to certain cost-share requirements, and for other purposes.

Cost-Share Accountability Act of 2025

Cost-Share Accountability Act of 2025

Cost-Share Accountability Act of 2025

To amend the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to require reporting relating to certain cost-share requirements, and for other purposes.

Associated Legislation

undefined

Policy Areas

Energy

Potential Impact

Congressional oversight

Energy research

Research administration and funding

Research and development

Sponsors and Supporters

Rep. Obernolte, Jay [R-CA-23]

Rep. Obernolte, Jay [R-CA-23]

Rep. Obernolte, Jay [R-CA-23]

Rep. Obernolte, Jay [R-CA-23]

Rep. Obernolte, Jay [R-CA-23]

Rep. Obernolte, Jay [R-CA-23]

Cosponsors and Supporters

Rep. Foster, Bill [D-IL-11]

Committees and Subcommittees

Science, Space, and Technology Committee

Energy and Natural Resources Committee

Science, Space, and Technology Committee

Variations and Revisions