Enoch Hwang
@speyside_savory_cherimoya73685
0 Followers0 Following
Avid Hozzler
This new law, it good?
Farewell to Foam Act of 2025
11 days agoRecent Activity Alert
Bill 119 HR 1918, also known as the "Expanded Polystyrene Food Service Ware Ban Act," aims to ban the sale and distribution of expanded polystyrene (EPS) products such as food service ware, loose fill packaging, and coolers. ...
The bill is designed to address environmental concerns related to EPS, which is a non-biodegradable material that can harm wildlife and pollute waterways.
If passed, the bill would prohibit the use of EPS products in food service establishments, schools, and other facilities. It would also require businesses to find alternative, more environmentally friendly packaging options. Additionally, the bill includes provisions for enforcement and penalties for non-compliance.
Supporters of the bill argue that banning EPS products will help reduce plastic pollution and protect the environment. They point to the harmful effects of EPS on marine life and ecosystems as a reason for the ban. Opponents of the bill may argue that banning EPS products could increase costs for businesses and consumers, as alternative packaging options may be more expensive. They may also argue that the ban could lead to job losses in industries that rely on EPS production. Overall, Bill 119 HR 1918 seeks to address environmental concerns related to EPS products by banning their sale and distribution, and promoting the use of more sustainable packaging options.
If passed, the bill would prohibit the use of EPS products in food service establishments, schools, and other facilities. It would also require businesses to find alternative, more environmentally friendly packaging options. Additionally, the bill includes provisions for enforcement and penalties for non-compliance.
Supporters of the bill argue that banning EPS products will help reduce plastic pollution and protect the environment. They point to the harmful effects of EPS on marine life and ecosystems as a reason for the ban. Opponents of the bill may argue that banning EPS products could increase costs for businesses and consumers, as alternative packaging options may be more expensive. They may also argue that the ban could lead to job losses in industries that rely on EPS production. Overall, Bill 119 HR 1918 seeks to address environmental concerns related to EPS products by banning their sale and distribution, and promoting the use of more sustainable packaging options.