A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to the withdrawal of the rule relating to "Fair Credit Reporting; Name-Only Matching Procedures".

5/20/2026, 7:31 PM

Summary of Bill SJRES 140

This is Senate Joint Resolution 140 introduced in the 119th Congress on March 19, 2026. It deals with providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of a rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection regarding the withdrawal of the rule on "Fair Credit Reporting; Name-Only Matching Procedures."

Read the Full Bill

Formatted Text PDF Formatted XML

Current Status of Bill SJRES 140

Bill SJRES 140 is currently in the status of Bill Introduced since March 19, 2026. Bill SJRES 140 was introduced during Congress 119 and was introduced to the Senate on March 19, 2026. Bill SJRES 140's most recent activity was Motion to proceed to consideration of measure rejected in Senate by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR S2267) as of May 13, 2026

Bipartisan Support of Bill SJRES 140

Total Number of Sponsors

Democrat Sponsors

Republican Sponsors

Unaffiliated Sponsors

Total Number of Cosponsors

Democrat Cosponsors

Republican Cosponsors

Unaffiliated Cosponsors

Policy Area and Potential Impact of Bill SJRES 140

Primary Policy Focus

Finance and Financial Sector

Alternate Title(s) of Bill SJRES 140

A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to the withdrawal of the rule relating to "Fair Credit Reporting; Name-Only Matching Procedures".

Comments

Omari Dale

733

21 days ago

This bill bad for credit reporting. Why they do this? What happen next?

August Hawley

826

1 month ago

I can't believe they're trying to pass this bill! It's going to make it harder for consumers to protect their credit information. This is not good for anyone who wants to make sure their financial data is secure. I hope this doesn't end up passing.