1
0

A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to the withdrawal of the rule relating to "Examinations for Risks to Active-Duty Servicemembers and Their Covered Dependents".

3/20/2026, 2:18 AM

Summary of Bill SJRES 132

A joint resolution, designated as S.J.Res. 132 in the 119th Congress, was introduced on March 18, 2026. The bill provides for congressional disapproval of a rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection regarding the withdrawal of the rule concerning "Examinations for Risks to Active-Duty Servicemembers and Their Covered Dependents."

Current Status of Bill SJRES 132

Bill SJRES 132 is currently in the status of Bill Introduced since March 18, 2026. Bill SJRES 132 was introduced during Congress 119 and was introduced to the Senate on March 18, 2026.  Bill SJRES 132's most recent activity was Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. as of March 18, 2026

Bipartisan Support of Bill SJRES 132

Total Number of Sponsors
1
Democrat Sponsors
1
Republican Sponsors
0
Unaffiliated Sponsors
0
Total Number of Cosponsors
0
Democrat Cosponsors
0
Republican Cosponsors
0
Unaffiliated Cosponsors
0

Policy Area and Potential Impact of Bill SJRES 132

Primary Policy Focus

Alternate Title(s) of Bill SJRES 132

A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to the withdrawal of the rule relating to "Examinations for Risks to Active-Duty Servicemembers and Their Covered Dependents".
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to the withdrawal of the rule relating to "Examinations for Risks to Active-Duty Servicemembers and Their Covered Dependents".

Comments