8
11
11
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the monitoring and regulation of water systems not be weaponized for the purposes of surveilling, tracking, or detecting use of, stigmatizing, and further restricting access to medication abortion care.
7/2/2026, 8:50 PM
Summary of Bill HRES 1389
The bill "Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives" introduced in the 119th Congress aims to prevent the weaponization of monitoring and regulation of water systems for surveilling, tracking, or detecting the use of medication abortion care. It stresses the importance of not stigmatizing individuals seeking such care and advocates against further restricting access to medication abortion care through water system monitoring and regulation. The bill was introduced on June 24, 2026, and emphasizes the need for maintaining privacy and access to reproductive healthcare services.
Read the Full Bill
Current Status of Bill HRES 1389
Bill HRES 1389 is currently in the status of Bill Introduced since June 24, 2026. Bill HRES 1389 was introduced during Congress 119 and was introduced to the House on June 24, 2026. Bill HRES 1389's most recent activity was Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce. as of June 24, 2026
Bipartisan Support of Bill HRES 1389
Total Number of Sponsors
1Democrat Sponsors
1Republican Sponsors
0Unaffiliated Sponsors
0Total Number of Cosponsors
0Democrat Cosponsors
0Republican Cosponsors
0Unaffiliated Cosponsors
0Policy Area and Potential Impact of Bill HRES 1389
Primary Policy Focus
HealthAlternate Title(s) of Bill HRES 1389
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the monitoring and regulation of water systems not be weaponized for the purposes of surveilling, tracking, or detecting use of, stigmatizing, and further restricting access to medication abortion care.
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the monitoring and regulation of water systems not be weaponized for the purposes of surveilling, tracking, or detecting use of, stigmatizing, and further restricting access to medication abortion care.
Comments

Ronan Koch
1,260
2 months ago
I support this bill cuz it protects privacy and access to healthcare. It's important for everyone.

Avi Reynolds
1,116
2 months ago
I don't agree with this bill. It seems like a violation of privacy and could potentially limit access to important healthcare services. I'm not sure how this will impact me personally, but it's concerning to see legislation like this being considered. #privacyrights #healthcareaccess

Francisco Pratt
1,188
2 months ago
I strongly oppose this bill as it infringes on personal privacy and restricts access to necessary healthcare. How will this impact individuals seeking medication abortion care in the short term?
Sponsors and Cosponsors of HRES 1389
Latest Bills
TRAPS Act
Bill HR 4936September 18, 2026
Apples to Apples Comparison Act of 2025
Bill HR 4093September 18, 2026
American Lending Fairness Act of 2026
Bill HR 7866September 18, 2026
Civil Investigative Demand Reform Act of 2025
Bill HR 1653September 18, 2026
American Reserve Modernization Act of 2026
Bill HR 8957September 18, 2026
Preventive Health Savings Act
Bill HR 4464September 18, 2026
PEARL Act
Bill HR 9327September 18, 2026
Medically Tailored Home-Delivered Meals Program Pilot Act
Bill HR 5439September 18, 2026
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 117 West Lovett Street in Charlotte, Michigan, as the "Francis C. Flaherty Post Office Building".
Bill HR 9570September 18, 2026
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1019 Avenue H in Fort Madison, Iowa, as the "Martin L. Graber Post Office".
Bill HR 4707September 18, 2026
