0
Noncontiguous Shipping Relief Act of 2024
2/26/2025, 6:53 PM
Summary of Bill HR 667
The bill seeks to promote more efficient and cost-effective transportation of goods to these noncontiguous regions by allowing foreign-flag vessels to participate in this trade. Currently, only US-flag vessels are allowed to transport merchandise between US ports, which can be more expensive and less competitive than using foreign-flag vessels.
Supporters of the bill argue that allowing foreign-flag vessels to participate in noncontiguous trade will lower shipping costs, increase competition, and improve access to goods for residents of these regions. They also believe that it will help to stimulate economic growth and create jobs in the maritime industry. Opponents of the bill raise concerns about national security and the potential impact on the US maritime industry. They argue that allowing foreign-flag vessels to transport goods between US ports could weaken the US maritime sector and compromise national security interests. Overall, the Noncontiguous Trade Act aims to address the challenges and inefficiencies in transporting goods to noncontiguous regions of the US by allowing foreign-flag vessels to participate in this trade. The bill is currently under consideration in Congress and has sparked debate among lawmakers and stakeholders in the maritime industry.
Congressional Summary of HR 667
Noncontiguous Shipping Relief Act of 2024
This bill establishes a limited exception to coastwise laws to allow foreign-flag freight vessels to transport merchandise domestically to or from a port in the noncontiguous United States. The bill also addresses various issues related to foreign-flag freight vessels engaged in coastwise trade (i.e., domestic waterborne trade between U.S. ports).
Under the coastwise laws, commonly known as the Jones Act, a freight vessel may not transport merchandise between U.S. ports unless it is U.S.-built, at least 75% owned by U.S. citizens, and mostly crewed by U.S. citizens. The bill authorizes qualifying foreign-flag vessels to transport merchandise between (1) a port in the contiguous United States and a port in the noncontiguous United States (i.e., Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, or a U.S. territory or possession); or (2) two ports in the noncontiguous United States.
Under the bill, all foreign-flag freight vessels operating in U.S. coastwise trade must comply with the (1) minimum international labor standards applicable to U.S. seafarers, and (2) same environmental standards that apply to U.S. vessels.
The bill authorizes such operators to participate in the Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation program on behalf of masters and crew members they employ.
The bill also requires foreign-flag vessel owners and operators engaging in coastwise trade to identify an agent for service of process, abide by U.S. tax and other laws, and maintain specified documentation on board. Additionally, lawsuits against such vessels alleging personal injury or death must be brought in U.S. district court.
Read the Full Bill
Current Status of Bill HR 667
Bipartisan Support of Bill HR 667
Total Number of Sponsors
6Democrat Sponsors
6Republican Sponsors
0Unaffiliated Sponsors
0Total Number of Cosponsors
2Democrat Cosponsors
0Republican Cosponsors
2Unaffiliated Cosponsors
0Policy Area and Potential Impact of Bill HR 667
Primary Policy Focus
Transportation and Public WorksAlternate Title(s) of Bill HR 667
Comments

Layla Dougherty
9 months ago
This bill is so dumb, like why are they even wasting time on it? It's like, just let it happen already. I don't get why people are so worked up about it. Just let it do its thing.

