43
45

Providing congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "California State Motor Vehicle and Engine Pollution Control Standards; Advanced Clean Cars II; Waiver of Preemption; Notice of Decision".

6/17/2025, 11:32 AM

Summary of Bill HJRES 88

Bill 119 hjres 88 is a piece of legislation that seeks to express congressional disapproval of a rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regarding California State Motor Vehicle and Engine Pollution Control Standards. The rule in question pertains to "Advanced Clean Cars II," which includes provisions for a waiver of preemption and a notice of decision.

The EPA's rule aims to allow California to set its own emissions standards for motor vehicles, which are more stringent than the federal standards set by the Clean Air Act. This waiver of preemption would give California the authority to enforce its own regulations, rather than being subject to federal regulations.

The bill, if passed, would effectively nullify the EPA's rule and prevent California from implementing its own emissions standards. Supporters of the bill argue that having separate state and federal regulations creates confusion for automakers and consumers, and that a uniform national standard is necessary for the automotive industry. Opponents of the bill, on the other hand, believe that California should have the right to set its own emissions standards in order to combat air pollution and address climate change. They argue that states should have the flexibility to implement stricter regulations if they believe it is necessary for the health and well-being of their residents. Overall, Bill 119 hjres 88 is a contentious piece of legislation that highlights the ongoing debate between states' rights and federal regulations when it comes to environmental policy.

Current Status of Bill HJRES 88

Bill HJRES 88 is currently in the status of Signed by President since June 12, 2025. Bill HJRES 88 was introduced during Congress 119 and was introduced to the House on April 2, 2025.  Bill HJRES 88's most recent activity was Became Public Law No: 119-16. as of June 12, 2025

Bipartisan Support of Bill HJRES 88

Total Number of Sponsors
23
Democrat Sponsors
0
Republican Sponsors
23
Unaffiliated Sponsors
0
Total Number of Cosponsors
144
Democrat Cosponsors
0
Republican Cosponsors
144
Unaffiliated Cosponsors
0

Policy Area and Potential Impact of Bill HJRES 88

Primary Policy Focus

Environmental Protection

Alternate Title(s) of Bill HJRES 88

Providing congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "California State Motor Vehicle and Engine Pollution Control Standards; Advanced Clean Cars II; Waiver of Preemption; Notice of Decision".
Providing congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "California State Motor Vehicle and Engine Pollution Control Standards; Advanced Clean Cars II; Waiver of Preemption; Notice of Decision".

Comments

Magdalena Gunter profile image

Magdalena Gunter

383

7 months ago

I don't agree with this. How will it impact my air quality and health?

Gia Stern profile image

Gia Stern

456

7 months ago

This bill is bad for cars. Who wins from this?

Juliet Coleman profile image

Juliet Coleman

460

7 months ago

This bill is concerning.

Roselyn Patrick profile image

Roselyn Patrick

425

7 months ago

I just don't get why they're trying to mess with this rule. Seems like it's important for keeping our air clean and our cars running smoothly. I hope they rethink this decision. #confused #cleanair #protecttheenvironment

Kyrie Terry profile image

Kyrie Terry

441

6 months ago

This bill is bad for environment and health. It make pollution worse. I not happy about it.

Pablo Baxter profile image

Pablo Baxter

431

6 months ago

I can't believe this bill is happening, it's so sad. I don't really understand what it's all about, but it seems like it's going to make things worse for the environment. I'm just a young person from IL, trying to do my part to help the planet, and this bill is really discouraging. I wish there was more we could do to stop it.

Paisley Byrne profile image

Paisley Byrne

425

7 months ago

This bill bad for environment. Big oil benefits.

Latest Bills

Trafficking Survivors Relief Act
Bill HR 4323December 5, 2025
Reliable Power Act
Bill HR 3616December 5, 2025
Smith River National Recreation Area Expansion Act
Bill S 945December 5, 2025
Roadless Area Conservation Act of 2025
Bill S 2042December 5, 2025
Historic Roadways Protection Act
Bill S 90December 5, 2025
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to "North Dakota Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan".
Bill HJRES 105December 5, 2025
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to "National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska Integrated Activity Plan Record of Decision".
Bill SJRES 80December 5, 2025
AM Radio for Every Vehicle Act of 2025
Bill HR 979December 5, 2025
SUPPORT for Patients and Communities Reauthorization Act of 2025
Bill HR 2483December 5, 2025
Internal Revenue Service Math and Taxpayer Help Act
Bill HR 998December 5, 2025
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "California State Motor Vehicle and Engine Pollution Control Standards; Advanced Clean Cars II; Waiver of Preemption; Notice of Decision".
Bill SJRES 45May 2, 2025
Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 60) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the National Park Service relating to "Glen Canyon National Recreation Area: Motor Vehicles"; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 78) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service relating to "Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Endangered Species Status for the San Francisco Bay-Delta Distinct Population Segment of the Longfin Smelt"; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 87) providing congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "California State Motor Vehicle and Engine Pollution Control Standards; Heavy-Duty Vehicle and Engine Emission Warranty and Maintenance Provisions; Advanced Clean Trucks; Zero Emission Airport Shuttle; Zero-Emission Power Train Certification; Waiver of Preemption; Notice of Decision"; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 88) providing congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "California State Motor Vehicle and Engine Pollution Control Standards; Advanced Clean Cars II; Waiver of Preemption; Notice of Decision"; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 89) providing congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "California State Motor Vehicle and Engine and Nonroad Engine Pollution Control Standards; The 'Omnibus' Low NOX Regulation; Waiver of Preemption; Notice of Decision"; and for other purposes.
Bill HRES 354October 9, 2025