0
To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to require consideration of economic impact in making a listing decision with respect to the list of threatened and endangered species, and for other purposes.
12/15/2023, 3:54 PM
Summary of Bill HR 1142
Currently, the Endangered Species Act focuses primarily on the conservation and protection of species without taking into account the potential economic consequences of listing a species as threatened or endangered. This bill seeks to change that by requiring the consideration of economic impact in addition to the existing criteria for listing decisions.
Proponents of the bill argue that by including economic impact in the decision-making process, it will help to balance the needs of conservation with the interests of industries and communities that may be affected by listing decisions. They believe that this will lead to more informed and balanced decisions that take into account both the environmental and economic impacts of listing a species. Opponents of the bill, however, argue that by prioritizing economic impact, it could potentially weaken the protections afforded to threatened and endangered species. They are concerned that this bill could lead to decisions that prioritize short-term economic gains over the long-term conservation of species. Overall, Bill 118 hr 1142 is a controversial piece of legislation that seeks to amend the Endangered Species Act by requiring the consideration of economic impact in listing decisions. It has sparked debate among lawmakers, conservationists, and industry stakeholders about the balance between conservation and economic interests.
Congressional Summary of HR 1142
This bill limits when the Department of the Interior or the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) may add a species to the endangered or threatened species list and revises the process to list species under the Endangered Species Act of 1973.
Specifically, Interior and NOAA may not add a species to the list if listing the species would cause significant economic harm to any state or locality.
In addition, the bill allows Interior and NOAA to prioritize the consideration of petitions to list a species as endangered or threatened other than in the order in which the petitions are received. However, Interior and NOAA may not give general priority to petitions to add species to the list over petitions to remove a species.




