0
0
0
Free Flow of Information Act of 2009
4/7/2025, 3:18 PM
Summary of Bill HR 985
Bill 111 hr 985, also known as the Free Flow of Information Act of 2009, was introduced in the US Congress with the aim of protecting the confidentiality of journalists' sources. The bill sought to establish a federal shield law that would prevent journalists from being compelled to reveal their sources in court.
The Free Flow of Information Act of 2009 defined a journalist as someone who gathers and reports news for a substantial portion of their livelihood or who is employed by a news organization. The bill outlined specific circumstances in which a journalist could be compelled to reveal their sources, such as in cases involving national security or imminent harm.
Supporters of the bill argued that it was necessary to protect the freedom of the press and ensure that journalists could report on important issues without fear of reprisal. They believed that a federal shield law would encourage whistleblowers and other sources to come forward with valuable information. Opponents of the bill raised concerns about the potential impact on national security and the ability of law enforcement to investigate crimes. They argued that the bill could hinder investigations and prevent the prosecution of individuals who leak classified information. Ultimately, the Free Flow of Information Act of 2009 did not pass in Congress. However, similar legislation has been introduced in subsequent years in an effort to protect journalists and their sources.
The Free Flow of Information Act of 2009 defined a journalist as someone who gathers and reports news for a substantial portion of their livelihood or who is employed by a news organization. The bill outlined specific circumstances in which a journalist could be compelled to reveal their sources, such as in cases involving national security or imminent harm.
Supporters of the bill argued that it was necessary to protect the freedom of the press and ensure that journalists could report on important issues without fear of reprisal. They believed that a federal shield law would encourage whistleblowers and other sources to come forward with valuable information. Opponents of the bill raised concerns about the potential impact on national security and the ability of law enforcement to investigate crimes. They argued that the bill could hinder investigations and prevent the prosecution of individuals who leak classified information. Ultimately, the Free Flow of Information Act of 2009 did not pass in Congress. However, similar legislation has been introduced in subsequent years in an effort to protect journalists and their sources.
Current Status of Bill HR 985
Bill HR 985 is currently in the status of Bill Introduced since February 11, 2009. Bill HR 985 was introduced during Congress 111 and was introduced to the House on February 11, 2009. Bill HR 985's most recent activity was Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. as of April 1, 2009
Bipartisan Support of Bill HR 985
Total Number of Sponsors
1Democrat Sponsors
1Republican Sponsors
0Unaffiliated Sponsors
0Total Number of Cosponsors
0Democrat Cosponsors
0Republican Cosponsors
0Unaffiliated Cosponsors
0Policy Area and Potential Impact of Bill HR 985
Primary Policy Focus
LawComments
Sponsors and Cosponsors of HR 985
Latest Bills
Protecting Indian Water Rights Settlements Act of 2026
Bill S 4890August 20, 2026
Lindsey O. Graham Sanctioning Russia and Iran Act of 2026
Bill HR 5334August 20, 2026
Railroad Retirement Board Stability Act
Bill S 4965August 20, 2026
D.C. Taxing Authority Review Act
Bill HR 9720August 20, 2026
Fiscal Sponsorship Transparency Act of 2026
Bill HR 9721August 20, 2026
Fair Treatment of Religious Organizations Act of 2026
Bill HR 9722August 20, 2026
READ Act
Bill S 4689August 20, 2026
NIH IMPROVE Act
Bill HR 6238August 19, 2026
Continuing Appropriations and Extensions Act, 2027
Bill HR 6500August 18, 2026
Permitting Transparency and Accountability Act
Bill S 1735August 18, 2026





