0
Sunset Chevron Act
2/6/2025, 1:08 AM
Summary of Bill HR 274
If passed, this bill would require agencies to review and potentially repeal any rules that have been upheld based on Chevron deference within a certain timeframe. This would allow for a more transparent and accountable regulatory process, as agencies would be required to justify their rules based on the text of the statute rather than relying on deference from the courts.
Overall, the Sunset of Rules Upheld Based on Chevron Deference Act aims to promote a more balanced and fair regulatory environment by limiting the power of agencies to interpret statutes in a way that may not align with congressional intent. It will be interesting to see how this bill progresses through Congress and what impact it may have on the regulatory landscape in the future.
Congressional Summary of HR 274
Sunset Chevron Act
This bill requires the Government Accountability Office (GAO) to compile a list of, and sunset dates for, federal agency rules that were upheld under the administrative law doctrine of Chevron deference. (In Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, the Supreme Court overturned Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council and held that courts must exercise their independent judgment in deciding whether an agency has acted within its statutory authority. Under Loper, the courts may not defer to an agency interpretation of the law simply because a statute is ambiguous, as the Chevron doctrine required.)
Under the bill, the GAO list must include each federal court decision that (1) upheld a rule based on Chevron deference, (2) was not subsequently overturned, and (3) pertains to a rule that is in effect on the date of enactment of this bill. The list must also include a sunset date for each identified rule.
The sunset date for each agency's most recent rule on the list must be 30 days after the list is published. The sunset date for each prior rule of the agency must be 30 days after the sunset date of the rule preceding it on the list.
Further, rules identified on the list are subject to a joint resolution of disapproval under the Congressional Review Act without regard to the 60-legislative-day limit on the period for filing such a resolution after a rule has been received by Congress.
Read the Full Bill
Current Status of Bill HR 274
Bipartisan Support of Bill HR 274
Total Number of Sponsors
1Democrat Sponsors
0Republican Sponsors
1Unaffiliated Sponsors
0Total Number of Cosponsors
24Democrat Cosponsors
0Republican Cosponsors
24Unaffiliated Cosponsors
0Policy Area and Potential Impact of Bill HR 274
Primary Policy Focus
Alternate Title(s) of Bill HR 274
Comments

Scott McNeill
1 year ago
I don't think this is fair. Why does it have to be like this? What about the other options?

Rosemary Cochran
1 year ago
I can't believe this bill is even being considered! It's just going to make things more confusing and chaotic. Why fix something that isn't broken? This is going to have a negative impact on so many people, including myself. I really hope this doesn't pass.





