The Judicial Branch Awarded a Contract to DIEBOLD NIXDORF, INC for $6,502,016.70

Summary of Award

The presented JSON data offers a comprehensive summary of a federal contract awarded to Diebold Nixdorf, Inc. This contract is managed under the parameters defined by the U.S. government for providing goods and services. The contract, categorized as an "Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity" (IDIQ) agreement, pertains specifically to home intrusion detection systems. This suggests a focus on maintaining and repairing equipment related to alarm, signal, and security detection systems, represented by the Product Service Code (PSC) J063.

### Contract Overview

This IDIQ contract, identified by the unique award ID "CONT_IDV_DJM15A32V0033_1544," was signed on August 26, 2015, setting its performance period from October 1, 2015, to March 31, 2021. Such contracts allow flexibility in orders over the specified period, up to a ceiling of $6,502,016.70, reflecting the total potential contract value if all options are exercised. ### Government Agencies Involved The contract involves several key government entities, including the funding and awarding agencies: 1. **Funding Agency**: The Judicial Branch, with the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts handling procurement management. This highlights the contract's operational and fiscal oversight within the judicial system's infrastructure. 2. **Awarding Agency**: The Department of Justice, specifically the U.S. Marshals Service, responsible for federal law enforcement. This agency manages security contracts, reflecting the contract's alignment with maintaining robust security measures. ### Recipient Details The recipient, Diebold Nixdorf, Inc., is a prominent player in security systems services, excluding locksmith operations, as denoted by the NAICS code 561621. Operating from North Canton, Ohio, the firm is categorized as a corporate entity that is not tax-exempt and functions as a manufacturer of goods. It is a U.S.-owned business, which further supports federal procurement policies favoring domestic corporations. Despite not being designated a small business, Diebold’s expertise in security solutions positions it well to handle complex governmental contracts like the one described. ### Transaction Mechanisms Even though the JSON data does not provide specific transactions related to the contract, the IDIQ framework allows the government to place multiple delivery orders as needed. The contract is structured on a firm-fixed-price basis. This pricing mechanism ensures predictability in budgeting and cost management for both the government and Diebold Nixdorf. Firm-fixed-price contracts are often favored in scenarios where costs can be confidently estimated and controlled. ### Competition and Procurement The contract resulted from a negotiation process classified under "NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE," indicating a competitive yet nuanced procurement process utilizing full and open competition. This means all qualified vendors were invited to submit proposals, ensuring fair competitive practices. The Department of Justice received two offers, selecting Diebold Nixdorf based on the evaluation criteria set forth in the solicitation process. ### Regulatory and Compliance Aspects Several compliance dimensions emerge from the data. For instance, clauses such as "NO SET ASIDE USED" indicate that the contract did not cater exclusively to small businesses or specific categories that might receive preferential treatment under other procurement regulations. Additionally, there’s no involvement of foreign funding, underscoring the contract's domestic nature. Labor standards, construction wage rates, and materials are marked as "NOT APPLICABLE," signifying simplified compliance requirements, typical of service contracts without significant materials or construction costs. ### Final Observations The contract's implications extend beyond financial figures, illustrating a strategic partnership between Diebold Nixdorf and governmental agencies to uphold security infrastructure within judicial and law enforcement facets. The absence of explicit transaction data suggests that additional specifics regarding order quantities and financial disbursements could be archived in subsequent databases or agency records. Overall, the contract exemplifies a structured approach to government contracting, emphasizing security services' importance, compliance, and competitive procurement while fostering domestic business participation in federal initiatives. This method not only aids in maintaining government infrastructure but ensures alignment with broader policy objectives governing federal procurement activities.