Bill 119 HR 133, also known as the "Hydraulic Fracturing Prohibition Act," aims to prevent any future moratorium on the use of hydraulic fracturing, also known as fracking, in the United States. The bill was introduced in response to growing concerns about the potential economic and energy security implications of banning this controversial drilling technique.
Hydraulic fracturing is a method of extracting natural gas and oil from underground rock formations by injecting a mixture of water, sand, and chemicals at high pressure. While supporters argue that fracking has led to increased domestic energy production and job creation, opponents raise concerns about its environmental impact, including water contamination and seismic activity.
If passed, Bill 119 HR 133 would prohibit any federal agency from imposing a moratorium on hydraulic fracturing, ensuring that the practice can continue without interruption. Proponents of the bill argue that it is necessary to protect the economic benefits of fracking, while opponents argue that it prioritizes industry interests over environmental and public health concerns.
Overall, Bill 119 HR 133 is a contentious piece of legislation that highlights the ongoing debate surrounding the use of hydraulic fracturing in the United States. Its passage would have significant implications for the future of energy production and environmental policy in the country.