0
0

Trust the Science Act

1/31/2025, 6:53 PM

Summary of Bill HR 130

Bill 119 hr 130, also known as the Gray Wolf State Management Act of 2021, aims to remove the gray wolf from the list of endangered and threatened wildlife under the Endangered Species Act of 1973. The bill requires the Secretary of the Interior to reissue regulations that would delist the gray wolf, allowing states to manage their populations.

Supporters of the bill argue that the gray wolf population has recovered significantly since being listed as endangered, and that states should have the authority to manage their own wildlife populations. They believe that delisting the gray wolf will help reduce conflicts between wolves and livestock, as well as give states more flexibility in conservation efforts.

Opponents of the bill, however, are concerned that removing protections for the gray wolf could lead to a decline in their population and threaten their survival. They argue that the Endangered Species Act is necessary to ensure the continued protection of vulnerable species, and that delisting the gray wolf could have negative ecological consequences. Overall, the Gray Wolf State Management Act of 2021 is a controversial piece of legislation that raises important questions about the balance between conservation efforts and state management of wildlife populations. It will be important for lawmakers to carefully consider the potential impacts of delisting the gray wolf before making a decision on this bill.

Congressional Summary of HR 130

Trust the Science Act

This bill directs the Department of the Interior to remove protections for the gray wolf under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA). Specifically, the bill requires Interior to reissue the final rule titled Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Removing the Gray Wolf (Canis lupus) From the List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and published on November 3, 2020.

The rule removed the gray wolf in the lower 48 United States, except for the Mexican wolf (C. l. baileyi) subspecies, from the endangered and threatened species list. However, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California vacated the rule on February 10, 2022. As a result, the gray wolf reattained the protection status it had prior to the rule's promulgation.

The bill also prohibits the reissuance of the rule from being subject to judicial review.

Current Status of Bill HR 130

Bill HR 130 is currently in the status of Bill Introduced since January 3, 2025. Bill HR 130 was introduced during Congress 119 and was introduced to the House on January 3, 2025.  Bill HR 130's most recent activity was Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources. as of January 3, 2025

Bipartisan Support of Bill HR 130

Total Number of Sponsors
7
Democrat Sponsors
0
Republican Sponsors
7
Unaffiliated Sponsors
0
Total Number of Cosponsors
0
Democrat Cosponsors
0
Republican Cosponsors
0
Unaffiliated Cosponsors
0

Policy Area and Potential Impact of Bill HR 130

Primary Policy Focus

Animals

Alternate Title(s) of Bill HR 130

To require the Secretary of the Interior to reissue regulations removing the gray wolf from the list of endangered and threatened wildlife under the Endangered Species Act of 1973.
To require the Secretary of the Interior to reissue regulations removing the gray wolf from the list of endangered and threatened wildlife under the Endangered Species Act of 1973.

Comments

Kaysen Burton profile image

Kaysen Burton

491

11 months ago

I don't think it's right to take gray wolves off the endangered list. What about their habitat and survival? How will this bill impact other wildlife and the environment?

Raiden Olsen profile image

Raiden Olsen

461

11 months ago

I don't know much about this bill, but it sounds like a bad idea to take the gray wolf off the endangered list. This is just going to cause more harm to the environment and wildlife. It's really disappointing to see this happening.

Sponsors and Cosponsors of HR 130

Latest Bills

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Ethics in the One Hundred Nineteenth Congress.
Bill HRES 131December 12, 2025
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to "Central Yukon Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan".
Bill HJRES 106December 12, 2025
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives in condemning the Government of the People's Republic of China for its harassment and efforts to intimidate American citizens and other individuals on United States soil with the goal of suppressing speech and narratives the People's Republic of China finds unwelcome.
Bill HRES 130December 12, 2025
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to "North Dakota Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan".
Bill HJRES 105December 12, 2025
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to "Miles City Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan Amendment".
Bill HJRES 104December 12, 2025
Providing amounts for the expenses of the Select Committee on the Strategic Competition Between the United States and the Chinese Communist Party in the One Hundred Nineteenth Congress.
Bill HRES 104December 12, 2025
Critical Access for Veterans Care Act
Bill S 1868December 12, 2025
OATH Act of 2025
Bill S 1665December 12, 2025
A bill to extend the authority for modifications to the Second Division Memorial in the District of Columbia.
Bill S 1353December 12, 2025
Saving Our Veterans Lives Act of 2025
Bill S 926December 12, 2025