0
0
0
Censuring and condemning United States District Court Judge Tanya Chutkan.
12/15/2023, 3:52 PM
Summary of Bill HRES 658
Bill 118 H.Res. 658 is a resolution introduced in the US Congress that seeks to censure and condemn United States District Court Judge Tanya Chutkan. The resolution accuses Judge Chutkan of judicial misconduct and abuse of power in her handling of certain cases.
The resolution alleges that Judge Chutkan has repeatedly overstepped her authority by making biased and politically motivated decisions, disregarding legal precedent, and showing favoritism towards certain parties in her courtroom. It also accuses her of failing to uphold the rule of law and undermining the integrity of the judicial system.
Supporters of the resolution argue that Judge Chutkan's actions have eroded public trust in the judiciary and have damaged the reputation of the federal court system. They believe that censuring and condemning her is necessary to hold her accountable for her actions and to send a message that such behavior will not be tolerated. Opponents of the resolution argue that it is a politically motivated attack on Judge Chutkan, who has a reputation for being fair and impartial in her rulings. They believe that the resolution is an attempt to undermine the independence of the judiciary and to intimidate judges who may rule against the interests of certain political factions. Overall, Bill 118 H.Res. 658 is a controversial resolution that highlights the ongoing debate over the role of the judiciary in American politics and the importance of maintaining the integrity and independence of the federal court system.
The resolution alleges that Judge Chutkan has repeatedly overstepped her authority by making biased and politically motivated decisions, disregarding legal precedent, and showing favoritism towards certain parties in her courtroom. It also accuses her of failing to uphold the rule of law and undermining the integrity of the judicial system.
Supporters of the resolution argue that Judge Chutkan's actions have eroded public trust in the judiciary and have damaged the reputation of the federal court system. They believe that censuring and condemning her is necessary to hold her accountable for her actions and to send a message that such behavior will not be tolerated. Opponents of the resolution argue that it is a politically motivated attack on Judge Chutkan, who has a reputation for being fair and impartial in her rulings. They believe that the resolution is an attempt to undermine the independence of the judiciary and to intimidate judges who may rule against the interests of certain political factions. Overall, Bill 118 H.Res. 658 is a controversial resolution that highlights the ongoing debate over the role of the judiciary in American politics and the importance of maintaining the integrity and independence of the federal court system.
Congressional Summary of HRES 658
This resolution censures and condemns Judge Tanya Chutkan of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. The resolution also directs the House Committee on the Judiciary to initiate an investigation into Judge Chutkan.
Current Status of Bill HRES 658
Bill HRES 658 is currently in the status of Bill Introduced since August 18, 2023. Bill HRES 658 was introduced during Congress 118 and was introduced to the House on August 18, 2023. Bill HRES 658's most recent activity was Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Rules, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned. as of August 18, 2023
Bipartisan Support of Bill HRES 658
Total Number of Sponsors
1Democrat Sponsors
0Republican Sponsors
1Unaffiliated Sponsors
0Total Number of Cosponsors
0Democrat Cosponsors
0Republican Cosponsors
0Unaffiliated Cosponsors
0Policy Area and Potential Impact of Bill HRES 658
Primary Policy Focus
LawComments
Sponsors and Cosponsors of HRES 658
Latest Bills
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to "Central Yukon Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan".
Bill HJRES 106December 12, 2025
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to "North Dakota Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan".
Bill HJRES 105December 12, 2025
Holocaust Expropriated Art Recovery Act of 2025
Bill S 1884December 12, 2025
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to "Miles City Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan Amendment".
Bill HJRES 104December 12, 2025
Enduring Justice for Victims of Trafficking Act
Bill S 2584December 12, 2025
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2026
Bill S 1071December 12, 2025
Technical Corrections to the Northwestern New Mexico Rural Water Projects Act, Taos Pueblo Indian Water Rights Settlement Act, and Aamodt Litigation Settlement Act
Bill S 640December 12, 2025
Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2026
Bill HR 4016December 12, 2025
End the Fed’s Big Bank Bailout Act
Bill S 2113December 12, 2025
Federal Reserve Transparency Act of 2025
Bill S 2327December 12, 2025
