Bill 118 hr 117, also known as the "COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate Prohibition Act," aims to prevent any organization or entity that receives federal funds from the COVID relief packages from requiring their employees to receive a COVID-19 vaccine. The bill also includes provisions for other purposes related to COVID-19 vaccine mandates.
The bill is designed to protect the rights of employees who may have concerns or objections to receiving the COVID-19 vaccine. By prohibiting entities that receive federal funds from mandating the vaccine, the bill seeks to ensure that individuals have the freedom to make their own decisions regarding their health and medical treatment.
Supporters of the bill argue that it is important to uphold individual rights and autonomy, particularly in the context of a rapidly developed vaccine for a novel virus. They believe that mandating the vaccine could infringe on personal freedoms and create unnecessary conflicts in the workplace.
Opponents of the bill, however, may argue that requiring the COVID-19 vaccine for employees is necessary to protect public health and prevent the spread of the virus. They may also argue that federal funds should come with certain conditions to ensure the safety and well-being of employees and the general population.
Overall, Bill 118 hr 117 raises important questions about the balance between individual rights and public health concerns in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. It will be important for lawmakers to carefully consider the implications of this bill and weigh the potential benefits and drawbacks of prohibiting vaccine mandates for entities that receive federal funds.