Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives relating to "Factoring Criteria for Firearms with Attached 'Stabilizing Braces'".

This joint resolution nullifies the rule issued by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives titled Factoring Criteria for Firearms With Attached "Stabilizing Braces" and published on January 31, 2023. The rule establishes criteria for determining whether a firearm equipped with an attached stabilizing brace that facilitates shoulder fire is a rifle subject to regulation (e.g., registration) under the National Firearms Act.

Bill 118 hjres 44, also known as the "Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives relating to 'Factoring Criteria for Firearms with Attached 'Stabilizing Braces'", is a piece of legislation that aims to overturn a rule proposed by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) regarding the classification of firearms with attached stabilizing braces.

The rule in question, which was submitted by the ATF, outlines new criteria for determining whether a firearm with an attached stabilizing brace should be classified as a pistol or a short-barreled rifle under the National Firearms Act. Stabilizing braces are accessories that can be attached to firearms to improve stability and accuracy when shooting.

Supporters of Bill 118 hjres 44 argue that the ATF's proposed rule would unfairly restrict the rights of gun owners and potentially criminalize the possession of certain firearms that have been legally purchased and used for years. They believe that the rule would create confusion and uncertainty among gun owners and could lead to unnecessary legal challenges. Opponents of the bill, on the other hand, argue that the ATF's rule is necessary to clarify the classification of firearms with stabilizing braces and ensure that they are regulated appropriately under existing firearms laws. They believe that the rule is a reasonable measure to prevent the misuse of firearms and enhance public safety. Overall, Bill 118 hjres 44 is a contentious piece of legislation that highlights the ongoing debate over gun control and the regulation of firearms in the United States. It remains to be seen how Congress will ultimately vote on this bill and what impact it will have on the classification of firearms with attached stabilizing braces.