Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services relating to "Medicare and Medicaid Programs: Minimum Staffing Standards for Long-Term Care Facilities and Medicaid Institutional Payment Transparency Reporting".

10/9/2024, 5:35 PM
Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 21 - 18.
Bill 118 hjres 139, also known as the "Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services relating to 'Medicare and Medicaid Programs: Minimum Staffing Standards for Long-Term Care Facilities and Medicaid Institutional Payment Transparency Reporting'", is a piece of legislation that aims to challenge a rule proposed by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

The rule in question pertains to minimum staffing standards for long-term care facilities and Medicaid institutional payment transparency reporting. The CMS rule seeks to establish requirements for long-term care facilities to maintain a minimum level of staffing to ensure the safety and well-being of residents. Additionally, the rule aims to increase transparency in Medicaid institutional payment reporting to provide more accountability and oversight of funding allocation.

However, Bill 118 hjres 139 seeks to disapprove of this rule under chapter 8 of title 5 of the United States Code. This means that Congress is challenging the validity and implementation of the CMS rule, potentially leading to its repeal or modification. The bill is currently under review and debate in Congress, with lawmakers considering the potential impact of the CMS rule on long-term care facilities, Medicaid funding, and overall healthcare quality. Supporters of the bill argue that the rule may impose unnecessary burdens on facilities and could lead to unintended consequences. Critics, on the other hand, believe that the rule is necessary to improve the quality of care and ensure transparency in Medicaid funding. As the legislative process unfolds, it will be important to monitor the discussions and decisions surrounding Bill 118 hjres 139 to understand its implications for long-term care facilities, Medicaid programs, and healthcare regulation in the United States.
Congress
118

Number
HJRES - 139

Introduced on
2024-05-10

# Amendments
0

Sponsors
+5

Cosponsors
+5

Variations and Revisions

5/10/2024

Status of Legislation

Bill Introduced
Introduced to House
House to Vote
Introduced to Senate
Senate to Vote

Purpose and Summary

Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 21 - 18.
Bill 118 hjres 139, also known as the "Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services relating to 'Medicare and Medicaid Programs: Minimum Staffing Standards for Long-Term Care Facilities and Medicaid Institutional Payment Transparency Reporting'", is a piece of legislation that aims to challenge a rule proposed by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

The rule in question pertains to minimum staffing standards for long-term care facilities and Medicaid institutional payment transparency reporting. The CMS rule seeks to establish requirements for long-term care facilities to maintain a minimum level of staffing to ensure the safety and well-being of residents. Additionally, the rule aims to increase transparency in Medicaid institutional payment reporting to provide more accountability and oversight of funding allocation.

However, Bill 118 hjres 139 seeks to disapprove of this rule under chapter 8 of title 5 of the United States Code. This means that Congress is challenging the validity and implementation of the CMS rule, potentially leading to its repeal or modification. The bill is currently under review and debate in Congress, with lawmakers considering the potential impact of the CMS rule on long-term care facilities, Medicaid funding, and overall healthcare quality. Supporters of the bill argue that the rule may impose unnecessary burdens on facilities and could lead to unintended consequences. Critics, on the other hand, believe that the rule is necessary to improve the quality of care and ensure transparency in Medicaid funding. As the legislative process unfolds, it will be important to monitor the discussions and decisions surrounding Bill 118 hjres 139 to understand its implications for long-term care facilities, Medicaid programs, and healthcare regulation in the United States.
Alternative Names
Official Title as IntroducedProviding for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services relating to "Medicare and Medicaid Programs: Minimum Staffing Standards for Long-Term Care Facilities and Medicaid Institutional Payment Transparency Reporting".

Policy Areas
Health

Potential Impact
Administrative law and regulatory procedures•
Congressional oversight•
Department of Health and Human Services•
Health care costs and insurance•
Long-term, rehabilitative, and terminal care•
Medicaid•
Medicare

Comments

APPROVED
RM
Raymond McDaniel
@salt_rhubarb_peach06409
I think this bill is a good thing cuz it helps cut red tape and lets facilities make their own decisions. It might mean better care for me and my loved ones in the long run.

Recent Activity

Latest Action9/18/2024
Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 21 - 18.