Samuel Goldman

s medical professionals who perform such procedures on minors, seeking to hold them accountable for any malpractice that may occur.

The bill outlines that any medical professional who provides gender-transition procedures to individuals under the age of 18 could face legal consequences, including the loss of their medical license. It also emphasizes the importance of informed consent, stating that minors must fully understand the risks and potential consequences of such procedures before they can be performed.

Supporters of the bill argue that children are not capable of fully understanding the long-term implications of gender-transition procedures and that it is the responsibility of medical professionals to prioritize the well-being of their young patients. They believe that this legislation will help protect vulnerable children from potentially harmful medical interventions. Opponents of the bill, however, argue that it infringes on the rights of transgender individuals to access necessary medical care. They argue that gender dysphoria is a legitimate medical condition that can be alleviated through appropriate treatment, including gender-transition procedures. They believe that this bill could prevent transgender youth from receiving the care they need to live authentically. Overall, Bill 119 s 209 is a controversial piece of legislation that raises important questions about the intersection of medical ethics, parental rights, and the well-being of transgender youth. It remains to be seen how this bill will be received by Congress and the public at large.