A bill to restrict United States voluntary and assessed contributions to the United Nations, and for other purposes.

Bill 119 s 313, also known as the "United Nations Funding Restriction Act," aims to limit the amount of money that the United States can contribute to the United Nations. The bill specifically targets both voluntary and assessed contributions, which are the two main ways that the US provides financial support to the UN.

Under this legislation, the US would be required to significantly reduce its voluntary contributions to the UN, which are funds that the country chooses to provide above and beyond its required assessed contributions. Additionally, the bill seeks to place restrictions on the amount of assessed contributions that the US can provide to the UN, which are mandatory payments that member states are required to make based on their relative wealth and income.

The purpose of this bill is to limit the financial burden that the United States faces in supporting the United Nations, as well as to ensure that US taxpayer dollars are being used effectively and efficiently. Proponents of the bill argue that the UN is often wasteful and inefficient in its use of funds, and that the US should not be required to contribute such large amounts of money to an organization that they believe does not always act in the best interests of the country. Opponents of the bill, however, argue that reducing US contributions to the UN could have negative consequences for international cooperation and diplomacy. They believe that the United Nations plays a crucial role in addressing global challenges such as poverty, conflict, and climate change, and that cutting funding to the organization could undermine these efforts. Overall, Bill 119 s 313 represents a significant shift in US policy towards the United Nations, and has sparked a heated debate among lawmakers and policymakers about the future of US involvement in the international organization.