To prohibit the use of funds to seek membership in the World Health Organization or to provide assessed or voluntary contributions to the World Health Organization.

1/24/2025, 9:05 AM
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Bill 119 HR 600, also known as the "World Health Organization Funding Prohibition Act," aims to prevent the United States from using any funds to seek membership in the World Health Organization (WHO) or to provide any assessed or voluntary contributions to the organization. The bill specifically targets the WHO, an international agency that focuses on global health issues and emergencies.

If passed, this legislation would effectively cut off any financial support from the US government to the WHO. This move is likely in response to criticisms of the WHO's handling of the COVID-19 pandemic and concerns about the organization's transparency and effectiveness.

Supporters of the bill argue that the WHO has failed to adequately address global health crises and that US taxpayer dollars should not be used to support an organization that they believe is ineffective. Critics, on the other hand, argue that withdrawing funding from the WHO could have negative consequences for global health efforts and could weaken international cooperation on health issues. Overall, Bill 119 HR 600 represents a significant shift in US policy towards the WHO and could have far-reaching implications for global health initiatives. It is currently being debated in Congress, and its ultimate fate remains uncertain.
Congress
119

Number
HR - 600

Introduced on
2025-01-22

# Amendments
0

Sponsors
+5

Cosponsors
+5

Status of Legislation

Bill Introduced
Introduced to House
House to Vote
Introduced to Senate
Senate to Vote

Purpose and Summary

Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Bill 119 HR 600, also known as the "World Health Organization Funding Prohibition Act," aims to prevent the United States from using any funds to seek membership in the World Health Organization (WHO) or to provide any assessed or voluntary contributions to the organization. The bill specifically targets the WHO, an international agency that focuses on global health issues and emergencies.

If passed, this legislation would effectively cut off any financial support from the US government to the WHO. This move is likely in response to criticisms of the WHO's handling of the COVID-19 pandemic and concerns about the organization's transparency and effectiveness.

Supporters of the bill argue that the WHO has failed to adequately address global health crises and that US taxpayer dollars should not be used to support an organization that they believe is ineffective. Critics, on the other hand, argue that withdrawing funding from the WHO could have negative consequences for global health efforts and could weaken international cooperation on health issues. Overall, Bill 119 HR 600 represents a significant shift in US policy towards the WHO and could have far-reaching implications for global health initiatives. It is currently being debated in Congress, and its ultimate fate remains uncertain.
Alternative Names
Official Title as IntroducedTo prohibit the use of funds to seek membership in the World Health Organization or to provide assessed or voluntary contributions to the World Health Organization.

Comments

Recent Activity

Latest Action1/22/2025
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.