To prohibit the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture from prohibiting the use of lead ammunition or tackle on certain Federal land or water under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture, and for other purposes.

1/29/2025, 9:05 AM
Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Bill 119 hr 556, also known as the "Hunting, Fishing, and Recreational Shooting Protection Act," aims to prevent the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture from banning the use of lead ammunition or tackle on specific Federal land or water under their jurisdiction. The bill seeks to protect the rights of hunters, fishermen, and recreational shooters to continue using lead-based ammunition and tackle without interference from the government.

The bill highlights the importance of preserving traditional hunting and fishing practices, as well as the economic benefits these activities bring to local communities. It argues that banning lead ammunition and tackle would restrict access to public lands and waters, limiting opportunities for outdoor recreation.

Supporters of the bill argue that there is insufficient scientific evidence to justify a ban on lead ammunition and tackle, and that alternative materials may not be as effective or affordable. They believe that the decision to use lead-based products should be left to individual hunters and fishermen, rather than being mandated by the government. Opponents of the bill, however, argue that lead ammunition and tackle pose significant risks to wildlife and the environment, as lead poisoning can have detrimental effects on animals and ecosystems. They advocate for the use of non-toxic alternatives to protect wildlife and prevent contamination of water sources. Overall, Bill 119 hr 556 raises important questions about the balance between conservation efforts and the rights of outdoor enthusiasts. It will be interesting to see how this legislation progresses through Congress and whether it will ultimately be signed into law.
Congress
119

Number
HR - 556

Introduced on
2025-01-16

# Amendments
0

Sponsors
+5

Cosponsors
+5

Status of Legislation

Bill Introduced
Introduced to House
House to Vote
Introduced to Senate
Senate to Vote

Purpose and Summary

Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Bill 119 hr 556, also known as the "Hunting, Fishing, and Recreational Shooting Protection Act," aims to prevent the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture from banning the use of lead ammunition or tackle on specific Federal land or water under their jurisdiction. The bill seeks to protect the rights of hunters, fishermen, and recreational shooters to continue using lead-based ammunition and tackle without interference from the government.

The bill highlights the importance of preserving traditional hunting and fishing practices, as well as the economic benefits these activities bring to local communities. It argues that banning lead ammunition and tackle would restrict access to public lands and waters, limiting opportunities for outdoor recreation.

Supporters of the bill argue that there is insufficient scientific evidence to justify a ban on lead ammunition and tackle, and that alternative materials may not be as effective or affordable. They believe that the decision to use lead-based products should be left to individual hunters and fishermen, rather than being mandated by the government. Opponents of the bill, however, argue that lead ammunition and tackle pose significant risks to wildlife and the environment, as lead poisoning can have detrimental effects on animals and ecosystems. They advocate for the use of non-toxic alternatives to protect wildlife and prevent contamination of water sources. Overall, Bill 119 hr 556 raises important questions about the balance between conservation efforts and the rights of outdoor enthusiasts. It will be interesting to see how this legislation progresses through Congress and whether it will ultimately be signed into law.

Comments

APPROVED
LM
Lenora McLamb
@houttuynia_cordata_patty_pan_bruichladdich31656
I don't like how it might impact me.

APPROVED
JS
Judith Shannon
@lemon_jerusalem_artichoke_nigella_sativa72247
I don't get why they want to stop them from stopping lead ammo. Seems like a bad idea. Did you know that this bill could potentially harm wildlife and contaminate water sources?

APPROVED
SB
Spencer Bowden
@green_pepper_onion_shallot45364
I think this bill is a bad idea. It could harm the environment and wildlife. It's not good for our future. The short term affects of this bill could be devastating for our ecosystem.

Recent Activity

Latest Action1/16/2025
Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the commi...