Trust the Science Act

1/31/2025, 6:53 PM
Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Bill 119 hr 130, also known as the Gray Wolf State Management Act of 2021, aims to remove the gray wolf from the list of endangered and threatened wildlife under the Endangered Species Act of 1973. The bill requires the Secretary of the Interior to reissue regulations that would delist the gray wolf, allowing states to manage their populations.

Supporters of the bill argue that the gray wolf population has recovered significantly since being listed as endangered, and that states should have the authority to manage their own wildlife populations. They believe that delisting the gray wolf will help reduce conflicts between wolves and livestock, as well as give states more flexibility in conservation efforts.

Opponents of the bill, however, are concerned that removing protections for the gray wolf could lead to a decline in their population and threaten their survival. They argue that the Endangered Species Act is necessary to ensure the continued protection of vulnerable species, and that delisting the gray wolf could have negative ecological consequences. Overall, the Gray Wolf State Management Act of 2021 is a controversial piece of legislation that raises important questions about the balance between conservation efforts and state management of wildlife populations. It will be important for lawmakers to carefully consider the potential impacts of delisting the gray wolf before making a decision on this bill.
Congress
119

Number
HR - 130

Introduced on
2025-01-03

# Amendments
0

Sponsors
+5

Variations and Revisions

1/3/2025

Status of Legislation

Bill Introduced
Introduced to House
House to Vote
Introduced to Senate
Senate to Vote

Purpose and Summary

Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Bill 119 hr 130, also known as the Gray Wolf State Management Act of 2021, aims to remove the gray wolf from the list of endangered and threatened wildlife under the Endangered Species Act of 1973. The bill requires the Secretary of the Interior to reissue regulations that would delist the gray wolf, allowing states to manage their populations.

Supporters of the bill argue that the gray wolf population has recovered significantly since being listed as endangered, and that states should have the authority to manage their own wildlife populations. They believe that delisting the gray wolf will help reduce conflicts between wolves and livestock, as well as give states more flexibility in conservation efforts.

Opponents of the bill, however, are concerned that removing protections for the gray wolf could lead to a decline in their population and threaten their survival. They argue that the Endangered Species Act is necessary to ensure the continued protection of vulnerable species, and that delisting the gray wolf could have negative ecological consequences. Overall, the Gray Wolf State Management Act of 2021 is a controversial piece of legislation that raises important questions about the balance between conservation efforts and state management of wildlife populations. It will be important for lawmakers to carefully consider the potential impacts of delisting the gray wolf before making a decision on this bill.
Alternative Names
Official Title as IntroducedTo require the Secretary of the Interior to reissue regulations removing the gray wolf from the list of endangered and threatened wildlife under the Endangered Species Act of 1973.

Policy Areas
Animals

Comments

APPROVED
KB
Kaysen Burton
@khmeli_suneli_thyme_bean_sprout21904
I don't think it's right to take gray wolves off the endangered list. What about their habitat and survival? How will this bill impact other wildlife and the environment?

APPROVED
RO
Raiden Olsen
@wasabi_fennel_banana18773
I don't know much about this bill, but it sounds like a bad idea to take the gray wolf off the endangered list. This is just going to cause more harm to the environment and wildlife. It's really disappointing to see this happening.

Recent Activity

Latest Action1/3/2025
Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.