A bill to increase the rate of duty on garlic originating from the People's Republic of China.

12/18/2024, 11:56 AM
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Bill 118 s 5564, also known as the "Garlic Duty Increase Act," is a proposed piece of legislation in the US Congress that aims to raise the rate of duty on garlic imported from the People's Republic of China. The bill seeks to address concerns about unfair competition and market manipulation in the garlic industry, as Chinese garlic imports have been flooding the US market at lower prices, potentially harming American garlic farmers.

If passed, the bill would increase the tariff on Chinese garlic, making it more expensive for importers to bring Chinese garlic into the US. This increase in duty is intended to level the playing field for American garlic farmers and protect domestic garlic production.

Supporters of the bill argue that the current influx of Chinese garlic is driving down prices and making it difficult for American farmers to compete. They believe that by raising the duty on Chinese garlic, it will help support domestic garlic production and ensure a fair market for American farmers. Opponents of the bill may argue that increasing tariffs on Chinese garlic could lead to higher prices for consumers and potentially strain trade relations between the US and China. They may also argue that the government should not interfere with free market competition and that American farmers should find ways to compete without relying on protectionist measures. Overall, the Garlic Duty Increase Act is a proposed piece of legislation that aims to address concerns about unfair competition in the garlic industry and protect American garlic farmers. It will be important to closely monitor the progress of this bill and consider the potential impacts on both domestic garlic production and international trade relations.
Congress
118

Number
S - 5564

Introduced on
2024-12-17

# Amendments
0

Sponsors
+5

Status of Legislation

Bill Introduced
Introduced to House
House to Vote
Introduced to Senate
Senate to Vote

Purpose and Summary

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Bill 118 s 5564, also known as the "Garlic Duty Increase Act," is a proposed piece of legislation in the US Congress that aims to raise the rate of duty on garlic imported from the People's Republic of China. The bill seeks to address concerns about unfair competition and market manipulation in the garlic industry, as Chinese garlic imports have been flooding the US market at lower prices, potentially harming American garlic farmers.

If passed, the bill would increase the tariff on Chinese garlic, making it more expensive for importers to bring Chinese garlic into the US. This increase in duty is intended to level the playing field for American garlic farmers and protect domestic garlic production.

Supporters of the bill argue that the current influx of Chinese garlic is driving down prices and making it difficult for American farmers to compete. They believe that by raising the duty on Chinese garlic, it will help support domestic garlic production and ensure a fair market for American farmers. Opponents of the bill may argue that increasing tariffs on Chinese garlic could lead to higher prices for consumers and potentially strain trade relations between the US and China. They may also argue that the government should not interfere with free market competition and that American farmers should find ways to compete without relying on protectionist measures. Overall, the Garlic Duty Increase Act is a proposed piece of legislation that aims to address concerns about unfair competition in the garlic industry and protect American garlic farmers. It will be important to closely monitor the progress of this bill and consider the potential impacts on both domestic garlic production and international trade relations.
Alternative Names
Official Title as IntroducedA bill to increase the rate of duty on garlic originating from the People's Republic of China.

Comments

Recent Activity

Latest Action12/17/2024
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.