Willa Bryant posted Illegitimate Court Counteraction Act...
This new law is a disaster! It gives too much power to the government and undermines the independence of the courts. It's going to have a negative impact on our democracy in the short term.
This new law is a disaster! It gives too much power to the government and undermines the independence of the courts. It's going to have a negative impact on our democracy in the short term.
Illegitimate Court Counteraction Act
4 months agoRecent Activity Alert
Bill 119 HR 23, also known as the Protecting United States Personnel and Allies from the International Criminal Court Act, aims to impose sanctions on the International Criminal Court (ICC) if it attempts to investigate, arre...
st, detain, or prosecute any individual considered a protected person of the United States and its allies. The bill is designed to prevent the ICC from taking action against US military personnel, government officials, or citizens, as well as those of US allies.
The bill seeks to protect these individuals from potential prosecution by the ICC, which is an international tribunal established to prosecute individuals for war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide. Supporters of the bill argue that the ICC's jurisdiction should not extend to US personnel and allies, as they believe that these individuals are already subject to the laws and regulations of their own countries.
Opponents of the bill, however, argue that it undermines the authority of the ICC and could potentially shield individuals from accountability for serious crimes. They argue that the ICC plays a crucial role in holding individuals accountable for atrocities committed around the world and that the US should not seek to exempt itself or its allies from its jurisdiction. Overall, Bill 119 HR 23 is a controversial piece of legislation that raises important questions about the balance between national sovereignty and international accountability. It remains to be seen how the bill will be received by Congress and what its implications will be for US involvement with the ICC.
The bill seeks to protect these individuals from potential prosecution by the ICC, which is an international tribunal established to prosecute individuals for war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide. Supporters of the bill argue that the ICC's jurisdiction should not extend to US personnel and allies, as they believe that these individuals are already subject to the laws and regulations of their own countries.
Opponents of the bill, however, argue that it undermines the authority of the ICC and could potentially shield individuals from accountability for serious crimes. They argue that the ICC plays a crucial role in holding individuals accountable for atrocities committed around the world and that the US should not seek to exempt itself or its allies from its jurisdiction. Overall, Bill 119 HR 23 is a controversial piece of legislation that raises important questions about the balance between national sovereignty and international accountability. It remains to be seen how the bill will be received by Congress and what its implications will be for US involvement with the ICC.
1 Repost